Fall of Islam in Iran: only 32% of Iranians are Muslims now

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Lugger 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

Lmao, your reply is the epitome of modern 'white nationalism':

Believing that muslims embracing globohomo and abandoning their tradition is good because it means a better chance to fuck a brown booty (I wonder if you're also one of the guys who criticize white w*men for dating/fucking non-white men) and lower birth rates in their own (!) country.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Men fucking women from other tribes is natural and should be lauded. Its spreading the tribe's genes far and wide. The Germans took over Britain and bred the local Celtic women. That's where Britain gets its nordic heritage from. Its entirely from German invaders taking local women and Germanizing Britain.

The Aryans did the same to ancient Europe. They conquered the continent and bred the local hunter gatherer and anatolian farmer women. That's why most of the European Y-chromosomal DNA is R1b or R1a, Germans and Slavs respectively. If you see the matrilineal heritage of Europe, its almost entirely non-Aryan.

Its glorious to take and breed women of other races, because you're depriving them of wombs and genetically assimilating them. Its shameful for that to happen to your own women for the same reason. It means you're being conquered.

[–]Lugger 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

Men fucking women from other tribes is natural and should be lauded. Its spreading the tribe's genes far and wide.

Hahaha! No, there's nothing glorious about that as it means creating disgusting half-breeds, though your example (Britain) is not really correct because Celts and Germanics are/were both white people, while you seem to like the idea of breeding with non-whites (Iranians).

Its glorious to take and breed women of other races

No, it's not. Men must stay loyal to their own women (and vice versa).

Also, don't know about you, but I don't find non-white women attractive and I would literally vomit before I consider 'taking' them.

because you're depriving them of wombs

You're talking about conquest, right? In that case, isn't it better (and more practical) to just... get rid of them? Why do you think it's good to make them carry and pop out mongrels?

No, it's neither honorable (but neither is murder, though, speaking of 'getting rid of them') nor useful.

genetically assimilating them

Are you kidding? Why would a 'white nationalist' worth his salt like the idea of 'genetically assimilating' people of other races and dilluting their own gene pool?

Its shameful for that to happen to your own women for the same reason. It means you're being conquered.

By the way, I have to remind you that in your first reply you weren't even talking 'conquering' women of other races.

You said something about hooking up with them "because some of them are hot", so most of your response is pretty off topic, really.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Hahaha! No, there's nothing glorious about that as it means creating disgusting half-breeds, though your example (Britain) is not really correct because Celts and Germanics are/were both white people, while you seem to like the idea of breeding with non-whites (Iranians).

If every African-American in the US became a half-breed with a Germanic parent, there'd be a lot less problems. Take a look at the Eyferth study, mulattos were actually found to have an IQ above what was to be expected which is the mean between black and white IQ. Arthur Jensen suggests heterosis enhanced their IQ:

Jensen suggests that heterosis may have enhanced the IQ level of the mixed race children in the study.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyferth_study

[–]Lugger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Forgive me, but how is that relevant to my post? We weren't discussing American blacks and the problems they cause; we were talking about how race-mixing is compatible with the views held by the majority of this sub: 'white nationalism'.

(I don't consider myself a WN or Alt-Right, by the way).

Furthermore, I am a Dutch 'Eurocuck', so your solution to the "Black Problem" doesn't concern me as much as it does your fellow Americans; I don't think I have a say in that.

Here in the NL the only correct way to deal with minorities is by peacefully deporting them back to their natural habitat.

We're a small nation and race-mixing our people into oblivion to make minorities commit less crime is a cuckold-tier unacceptable proposal.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ofc I don't mean you should race mix with them in Holland. I mean its fine to go to the middle east and bang them

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, I'm sorry but misgeneration should be avoided at any cost.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]arainynightinskyrim 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Our genes and characteristics are unique, we should not throw them away and give them to others.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Because it might bite us back, "Hello fellow Danes, I'm a Dane just like you, it is my right to come to your country".

      [–]GConly 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      the Eyferth study, mulattos were actually found to have an IQ above

      So there's issues with the Eyferth study.

      First of all, the armed forces weeded out anyone with an IQ under 87 (ish, not sure of exact number) which bumped up the average score of those kids by weeding out the dumber half of the black male recruits.

      Second, some if them were actually of north African origin.

      Third: age of testing was all over the place. If you do an IQ test in a young child, it's mainly going to be a product of its environment. As they get older genetics kick in. It's called the Wilson effect.

      [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      First of all, the armed forces weeded out anyone with an IQ under 87 (ish, not sure of exact number) which bumped up the average score of those kids by weeding out the dumber half of the black male recruits.

      80% were French Africans in the study, during WW2 when France was desperate and scraping the barrel. In France, military service is also mandatory.

      Of the fathers of the mixed-race children, about 80 percent were French Africans and the remaining approximately 20 percent were African Americans.[6]

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyferth_study

      Second, some if them were actually of north African origin.

      North Africans have an IQ below African-Americans. African-Americans being 85, while Morocco is 82 and Tunisia 83. Which means it is still 5.5 IQ points higher on average than what was to be expected, assuming we use the mean between Tunisian IQ and white IQ.

      https://new-iq-test.com/tunisia-average-iq.html

      https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php

      Third: age of testing was all over the place. If you do an IQ test in a young child, it's mainly going to be a product of its environment. As they get older genetics kick in.

      It is true heritability of IQ is lower as a child, however, the white boys in the study had the same IQ as white adults. It is still plausible and even likely heterosis had some part in the mulatto IQ as suggested by Arthur Jensen.

      [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      These kids were being raised by white mothers, which means they'll sway harder to the maternal IQ.

      [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      You do know that Iranians and Europeans share a shit load of ancestry. We share the Neolithic Turkish farmers that started off city building and agriculture about 10k ago (and also built the first temple at gobekli 13k ago).

      Also like to add that while people bang on about Muslim science, it was virtually all Persian and Iraqi and they were on a par with the ancient Greeks and Romans.

      Most of the rest of the Muslim area was a dead zone that way.

      We also share ancestry with them via the steppes ancestry of the proto Indo European herders that swept over Europe and South/central Asia about 4.5k ago.

      So they come into the same racial group as Europeans, as far as the average bio anthropologist is concerned.

      [–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      That didn't work out so well for most of the American continent. European men all but miscegenated themselves out of existence by fucking native women.

      Colonialism worked out so much better in the North because white men created European families with white women and had taboos and laws against miscegenation.

      [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      That's where Britain gets its nordic heritage from.

      And the invasion of the Danes. They ruled over the north east of England for a long time.

      I'd also like to correct some of your nonsense about Aryans and the peopling of Europe.

      Happened in several waves:

      Neolithic farmers from the Turkey/Iran) Syria area expanded into Europe starting 9k ago, arriving in the UK about 6k ago. Virtually all of the male Mesolithic ancestry vanished, some female remaining.

      Tribes from the steppes speaking proto Indo European then had a massive military expansion starting about 4.8k ago. They were a tribe of horsemen we call the Yamnaya. They weren't blond Aryans. The people they overran were not hunter gatherers.

      Same thing happened with the y chromosomes there.