all 15 comments

[–]PeddaKondappa 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

There is a theory that Stalin was indeed assassinated in the end. At least, Lavrentiy Beria (who was not a Jew himself, but might as well have been) seems to have intentionally procrastinated in getting medical attention to Stalin after his stroke, and later also supposedly told Molotov that he "took him [Stalin] out." But that remains an unverified theory, and Beria's gambit for absolute power failed miserably. Khrushchev and Zhukov combined to remove Beria from all positions of power, and by the end of 1953, Beria was charged with 357 counts of rape and executed with a bullet in the forehead.

Stalin was a genius and successfully outsmarted literally everyone for as long as he was alive and in good health. Probably no other person in history succeeded in rising to such a high position from such a humble background. The man went from being the son of an impoverished Georgian cobbler to becoming a virtual god-emperor who dominated the greater part of Eurasia directly or indirectly. If Stalin didn't exist and someone wrote a fiction novel with the same plot as Stalin's life story, it would be lampooned as being too unrealistic. I think the story of Stalin is very important in the current times especially, because it shows what an intelligent and highly determined man can achieve. It also serves as a healthy antidote to the idea, which seems very common in "dissident right" circles nowadays, of viewing elites as some kind of demigods who simply possess far too much power for us mere mortals to cope with. But as the story of Stalin shows, it is perfectly possible for an ordinary man with the right combination of traits and circumstances to rise up the ranks, and butcher the very same elites who had worked with him and who thought that they were invincible.

In the modern world, where the common people are suffering so much from an arrogant and hostile elite class, I think many people would greatly welcome a new Stalin and a new series of purges.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Wish I could upvote this twice. Stalin demonstrates what cunning and ruthlessness can achieve. The WASP elite in the US were too flacid. They could've ruthlessly slaughtered the Jews and seized all their assets. But the fools let the Jews take over their own country. They were fully cognizant of what has happening ala Henry Ford, but were to polite and complacent to do stop it.

The lesson from Stalin is, be ruthless, be cunning and see your plans to their logical conclusion no matter the cost. Do not let the false morality of Christ or Locke stay your hand.

[–]asterias 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The WASP elite in the US preferred to occupy themselves with the danger Chinese immigrants posed. They took active measures against Asians, but didn't mind giving power to Zionists.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

China was never the threat, not even today.

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's my point.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If Christian morality is 'false' then where do you form your moral structure? Or are you an amorality, social Darwinist, Might is Right type? If so, how are you any different than a Jew that sees the world through the lens of endless situational morality? How do you stop the train from sailing past survival of the fittest and right up to materialism? You do realize that Desmond's Might is Right was almost completely copied by Anton LaVey when he wrote The Satanic Bible.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If Christian morality is 'false' then where do you form your moral structure?

There's no such thing as a moral structure. It's all just an opinion. The only thing that matters is power.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Based and Willtopowerpilled

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It gets a lot right, at least on the criticisms of capitalism.

    [–]ShiversRussia2017[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    It takes just seconds to die, i can't see why they couldn't have just sent a death squad to his house or have a sniper kill him or poison him or have some lunatic rush him with a pistol.

    [–]arainynightinskyrim 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    As far as I know the man was extremely paranoic especially in his final years so he probably took every precaution to not get killed.

    [–]VarangianRasputin 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I'm a Stalin Apologist, but to be honest, I doubt much of this was intentionally anti-Jewish. Stalin simply just didn't agree with Internationalism as much as his comrades. If anything, the guy was just a Social Nationalist, which kind of makes sense considering he was ruling a multi-ethnic superstate. It's worth noting that much of the NKVD was still mostly Jewish under his rule, and most Soviet spies were Jewish (although it's also worth noting that many Jews and Trotskyists worked with the CIA against the Soviet Union). If Stalin did care about race at all, he probably took a more Spenglerian take on it as opposed to the NSDAPs Darwinist take, and if he did care about Jews as a problem, he probably agreed with Marx's take; that they should be assimilated into Socialist Society (Marx's 'On the Jewish Question' kind of kills the notion that he was conspiring on behalf of his race, although Judaism certainly had an influence on Marxism). They viewed Israel as an American Asset in the Middle East, and a Capitalist one at that. While Stalin's USSR was Socially Conservative, and 'National Bolshevik' in many senses of the term, I highly doubt he really cared about Jews and Race as a whole; rather that Jews in the party didn't like him because he appealed to Russian/Eurasian Nationalism and Pan-Slavism, and so they were the ones who were in his way and conspired against him accordingly.

    My point is he may have worked against them, but he never named them, which is often the turning point in how they treat dissenters.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Stalin's infamous Doctor's Plot, in which six Jewish doctors were arrested and tortured into making a confession, began with the Stalin-controlled media spreading rumors that Jewish doctors were poisoning Russian children by injecting them with diphtheria and killing infants in hospital wards. (Daily Mail, National Journal, 2003)

    To be honest. I wouldn't be surprised if the Jewish doctors in Soviet Russia were doing just that.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Stalin did nothing wrong.