Interesting piece: Will Turkey be America's new point man in the middle east?

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]asterias 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Americans think that Turkey is their ally, while Turkey will side with anyone without second thoughts. That was the case during WWII, where the countries that fought along Allies were given the finger, and instead Turkey became West's favorite child. The French surrendered Alexandretta to Turks in order to encourage them to side with them, which didn't happen until the war was almost over, while the British led to the tragedy of Cyprus in order to appease Turkey.

All this is supposed to be because Turks accepted the Jews of Spain and the current Turkish state was created by donmeh cryptojews, so the West chose to ignore the genocides of the Christian populations during the 20th century (and completely forget the role of the Jews during the Ottoman occupation).

Now Kurds have become another USA's favorite, which in the future will bite USA in the ass. Americans have learnt nothing from their experiments in Afghanistan.

By the way, August 7, 1933 is the day of the final episode in the Assyrian genocide, when Kurds irregulars massacred the remaining Assyrians. August 7 is the day of commemoration of the Assyrian genocide.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

donmeh cryptojews,

The Turkish islamic rightists for the longest time claimed that the religious rule in Turkey was overthrown by crypto Jews and Freemasons. Is this true? Was Ataturk a crypto?

And are the Assyrians Aryan?

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kemal was indeed a crypto, and the "Young Turks" consisted mainly of cryptos and freemasons. So the "Young Turks" were considered secular, while the "Old Turks" were considered similar to the Saudis in the religious sense. Both regimes were equally bloodthirsty, but kemalists are considered modernists.

You can see many photos here and here and maybe run the articles through an online translator from Greek to English, as they contain many details on the subject.

Concerning the Assyrians, I understand that "Aryan" is often given different meanings, but they are certainly not Arabs. They had been living in the area for thousands of years, as they were the original Babylonians and not some desert tribes.