all 17 comments

[–]Nombre27 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Pretty good list. About 2500 pages of reading.

Would be better to create summaries and possibly sourced infographics from the contents of various dissident works. Most people don't have the time, energy, or attention-span to digest such volumes.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    That would be great. Looking forward to that. Might be worthwhile creating a sub or thread dedicated to that.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    If this list is for the people you want to be most serious why is it all politically useless? If you're aiming at the cream of the crop give them serious works:

    Niccolo Machiavelli The Prince, Carl Schmitt The Concept of the Political, Francis Parker Yockey Imperium

    Anyone who isn't braindead already knows blacks are violent, races are different, Jews are Jews, capitalism and liberalism are trash etc. All that is left is to teach them what isn't intuitive to 99% of the population IE how to think seriously politically, to view themselves as revolutionaries in hostile occupied territory rather than as living in a society etc so they can be useful for the struggle.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      yikes

      [–]lithre 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Most people don't have the time, energy, or attention-span to digest such volumes

      You're forgetting the most important thing they lack: will.

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      I wish that people in this movement would think about the reading level of the average person. Many texts are not accessible to the average person. When someone asks about race realism, WWII, alt politics or any other alt right topic you should be able to give them three books and three articles ( all at low, medium and high lexile levels and you should tell them the level). People will be a LOT more likely to get involved in your movement if you don't require them to read a dozen 1200 page phd reading level texts in order to participate.

      [–]mankindeg 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Use this one: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337429197_Race_Differences_A_Very_Brief_Review

      A very Brief review of racial differences. It's by the respected Emil Kirkegaard of the Ulster Institute for Social Research.
      Anyone who is familiar with Kirkegaard's work knows that he knows his shit. About 150 references are at the end to other research (Some of the references are very good studies in themselves)

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Thanks for sharing!

      [–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      You familiar with The Barnes Review? I came across some of their stuff the other day.

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Fill me in.

      [–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      https://barnesreview.org/

      Wiki is brief and should fill you in a bit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Barnes_Review

      They've published quite a bit. Some is on libgen, some is on archive. 2.

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      The Southern Poverty Law Center describes The Barnes Review as "one of the most virulent anti-Semitic organizations around"

      Sounds like something worth looking into. I think I might have read a few of their articles when I was first diving on holohoax stuff. Is there a particular article or series you recommend? If you think there's something everyone should read you can also post it up on s/runebooks. Otherwise I will just slowly start looking into the site and get back with you when I've gone through it.

      [–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Is there a particular article or series you recommend?

      Literally stumbled across it yesterday, so I can't comment on that. The article that linked me to this journal was from Goodson's wiki, titled NAPOLEON, HITLER & THE BANKERS

      What was the basic relationship between the money power and these two towering world figures? What was behind Napoleon’s creation of the French national bank? Even more important, what was Hitler’s view of the money power, and what was his relation to it?

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        White Identity by Jared Taylor is a nice easy intro text.

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Yockey's Imperium is basically an all-encompassing book but for someone who has never read any right wing philosophers before it might be a bit difficult to understand.

        [–]Mr9to5 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        I cannot endorse Might Is Right highly enough. That may not please everyone here but literally everything that is good about the person I am today is because I read Might Is Right over and over a ridiculous number of times. But the trick is always getting people to read the damn book in context of the Nation and what it actually says and NOT what idiots think it says. (It is something akin to a blueprint for individual survival of someone who cares for their People. It is NOT a “Satanic” or “Egoist text,” nor a call for any number of anti-social behaviors.) We need to get our people in a mindset where they will survive the rough times ahead, it’s more important than being deeply ideological.

        Welf Herfurth’s Life in the Political Wilderness (and his speeches online about it) are great resources on how to be a Nationalist, while still being a good person with your neighbors. Actually having a chance to win hearts and minds.

        The Ego and It’s Own was a very formative text for me because it deconstructs the secular religions that became modern Leftism. Now, Stirner is an egoist but he is a useful one in that regard. You have to cut out the cancer of a certain type of fake morality to get people to think properly.

        I personally find Alain de Benoist approachable for a relatively intelligent person. A good list could include any number of his works. I remember Manifesto of the New Right being a good template for what we’re about.

        [–]mankindeg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Pretty good list. There is also a relatively new one by Kirkegaard on racial differences.

        He made it explicitly for some famous journal. It's only 30 pages or so long, so it's great for people with low attention spans. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337429197_Race_Differences_A_Very_Brief_Review