LGB ErasureOh, yeah. Because TRA's NEVER insult homosexuals who simply want their often fabricated history to be acknowledged for what it is!

submitted by Smolders1Cock is god's greatest gift. from i.imgur.com

all 18 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]artetolife 32 insightful - 1 fun32 insightful - 0 fun33 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

They are so convinced that their violent language is justified that they get a shock when they wander into the realm of normal people and get told that it's not acceptable. I say let them carry on like that, it will only 'peak' more people.

[–]oofreesouloo⚡super lesbian⚡ 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is true. Recently, I watched a TRA trying to say violence (physically or verbal) is justified if it's "for a good cause" (such as fighting transphobia bla bla) and it was REALLY pleasing to see EVERYONE disagreeing and saying that's the worst possible route and that violence is never the answer and that if they act like that people will disagree even more with them etc etc hehe

[–]artetolife 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In my country at least, there is a history of violent resistance against fascists, which I support - but what they miss is that this is against REAL fascists, people literally calling for the extermination of whole groups of people. Not JK Rowling speaking up for women's rights.

[–]oofreesouloo⚡super lesbian⚡ 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. Fortunately, sane people with common sense are able to tell the difference between JK Rowling (aka people that may have different opinions than yours) and real fascists. Only TRAs and totally toxic unstable individuals scream "suck my girldick" and want to kill and punch everyone who simply disagrees with them.

[–]MezozoicGayoldschool gay 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

people literally calling for the extermination of whole groups of people

Groups of people like lesbians (or women)? Hm, it reminds me something nowadays. Not sure what. Hmmmmmmm.

[–]8bitgay 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I say let them carry on and keep track. Because they love to act like nobody says that.

Also, keep track especially of the big names. In the end of the day the person in this tweet is just some random user with 4 likes. However I've seen profiles with thousands of followers and thousands of shares saying the same stuff.

[–]reluctant_commenter 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yup, totally agree.

edit: We should get like a repository going for the big-name ones.

[–]8bitgay 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At times like this I wish I kept some of the most absurd examples, written by people with thousands of followers. I barely use Twitter, but in the past I just blocked some of the people who say this homophobic stuff. Maybe I should have saved a few of the tweets before blocking. They weren't in English but I think it'd be nice to add examples in other languages too.

[–]BrokenEarth 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

For them speech is violence and violence is speech. You using the wrong gender is denying their existence, them bashing you is making a statement.

[–]MezozoicGayoldschool gay 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is their tactics for many years now. They are saying that "when we are not agressive, no one is listening to us, so we need to threaten people, for them to do what we demand". Few of them even linked me this article: https://archive.is/Ichkj (for some reason archived version is not full, here full but it is on medium) as one of reasons and justifications why they are so agressive. They still never explained to me why other people then must not be agressive too to them, if those people demanding something as well.

[–]haveanicedaytoo💗💜💙 14 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

How about "I won't shut the fuck up and you can continue to pound your little fingers onto your keyboard in impotent rage until you tucker yourself out."

What effect do they think their stupid little physical violence threats will have anyway? It only serves to make them look unstable and mentally deficient.

Anyway good to see you persevering!

[–]Smolders1Cock is god's greatest gift.[S] 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Other account in this image isn't censored because it's my account. :)

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only facts about Martha that they spread is that he was black, used the pseudonym "Martha" and was involved with stonewall in some way

He wasn't trans, didn't throw the first brick, and never started the gay pride movement or start the gay rights campaign

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Honestly, part of the problem is calling it the “LGBTQ” movement. That wasn’t a movement. Those letters together are just some dysfunctional social club. It was the GAY RIGHTS movement ffs. And that’s why it included homosexual transsexuals: because they too needed same-sex rights: Transbians and co had nothing to do with it because they’re heterosexual and had all of the rights gay and bisexual people wanted.

[–]Smolders1Cock is god's greatest gift.[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh, I apologise for referring to it as such, though, the original user was making the claim that Marsha 'started' the concept of that fucking alphabet club.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This wasn't meant to be a knock against you, so I apologize if it came across that way. You're not the one forcibly teaming us together with the genderists. I think we've just been unconsciously trained/socialized/indoctrinated to talk about the fight for gay rights in this way, and we would benefit from taking a step back and thinking about how much of their narrative is fiction and how we can combat that fiction by not adopting their language.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're rarely good at debating, but especially good at threatening bodily harm to silence people.

Hmm well, I guess if you can do one well, you won't need to worry about the other..

[–]PriestTheyCalledHimBisexual 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I remember when in the USA bisexual, lesbian, and gay people finally won the right to legally marry and serve openly in their military without being kicked out and trans and nutty TRAs instead of giving congratulations to us LGB people attacked us and were super jealous and angry.

There was also a proposed bill or law that protected the rights of bisexual, gays and lesbians from being discriminated against at work and it would have been made into law in the USA had trans and TRAs not gone crazy about how it did not include trans people.

Also the way trans and TRAs use or try to use the slur cis to describe all non-trans people is funny.