''Sorry, gender critical content is too offensive'' Meanwhile Reddit:

submitted by [deleted] from pbs.twimg.com

all 23 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MelanieMicrowave 35 insightful - 7 fun35 insightful - 6 fun36 insightful - 7 fun -  (4 children)

Ironically, if you post porn featuring TIMs to these you also get banned.

Also, all porn is rape porn.

[–]Literallyawoman 33 insightful - 8 fun33 insightful - 7 fun34 insightful - 8 fun -  (4 children)

Cue women on reddit defending this by being not like the other girls and stating they too love this porn so it’s totes fine

[–]vitunrotta 23 insightful - 10 fun23 insightful - 9 fun24 insightful - 10 fun -  (3 children)

Yep, just head over to the lovely hub of teenage "feminists" (teenage by age or ability to think...) called Buzzfeed and you will see a shit ton of articles and comments e.g. defending the song WAP, shaming vanilla people who are not into kinks (funny how THAT'S okay for them but "kinkshaming" makes them ~literally~ suffer), being super sex positive (read: how to have kinks and how it's the only way for a woman to be sexual) and so on and so on.

I mean, spare yourself: don't be tempted to know which kind of bread you'd be, even in your darkest, most boring-est hour. I did that and found out I was a bagel and I don't even like bagels that much :(

That place is so full of TRA propaganda they should just change their name to ButtFeet, because at least that way they'd acknowledge the praised KINKS we're all supposed to love, ya know.

[–]AugustiJade 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I will kink-shame them directly to their faces. Even better if they cry about it. Because I don't need to know what sort of weird shit complete strangers do behind closed doors. Somehow allowing homosexual men and women to marry like heterosexual couples meant we had to allow in all of this. Paedophiles are now trying to get in as well. Where does it stop at?

[–]Apricot_Ibex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Certain “kinks” (and by kinks I mean sexual predation, misogyny, abuse, outright rape, and pedophilia, which is what so many “kinks” are anyway) were out in the open way before the era of marriage equality. Chester the Molester in Hustler, Brooke Shields at age 10 completely nude in a Playboy publication in 1976...it’s whatever trendy media avenue of the day that men can exploit to force their kinks onto women and girls.

Edit: And good for you for kink shaming them to their faces. Kink “shaming” just means making people aware of the misogyny engrained into almost every single aspect of mainstream porn and “erotic” media. Men are getting away with murder via strangulation and “roughness” during sex and these idiots are worried about “kink shaming”!

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not a "somehow" effect. It was actively known by everyone for hundreds of years. I was just on an islamist area of the interwebs that said the same thing. Do I have to point you to archives of NAMBLA's site that admitted the link? They straight up said the reason they are maligned is due to a 'gay hating' society, as they put it.

[–]vitunrotta 13 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

"Thanks" for the gag of the day - and no, I do not mean the super excitingly feminist porn gag /s- I mean, that is just vile and disgusting. Are these things real? No, maybe don't even answer. In any case I am now forced to watch the entirety of approx. 392226 hours of videos I have filmed of my pets sleeping and playing (I had their consent, mind you).

So, actually, thanks, because those videos are great. Mwah.

[–]LeyMio 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It is ridiculously disgusting how Reddit defines "offensive" or "hateful" content. Literally anything related to shaming, beating, raping or murdering women is celebrated and welcomed there. Meanwhile, women who do not want to be harmed by men are just "too offensive to exist".

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Duh, they are leftists. They want all the awfulness they can get. But no conservatism can slip in. What they really can't handle is wholesome, intelligent, reasoning about the decline their movements have caused. /r/ThatWhichWasConserved or whatever was the perfect example of that.

[–]crazyangryfemale 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Conservatives and intelligence do not go together.

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So brilliantly argued! You're gone infinite and wrapped around to negative IQ. Maybe that's why I just lost some reading this.

[–]shveya 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

There was also a sub called something like "cute female corpses" for years. The depravity of porn-sick neckbeards is limitless.

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Wait.. like actual corpses or like cartoon drawings of zombie girls and the cover art for MSI's old album?

[–]Apricot_Ibex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

There were subs called DeadJailbait and PicsOfDeadKids (as in actual corpses of underage children), among many, many others, all used as sicko neckbeard fap material. They were up for years.

http://fledglingfeminist.blogspot.com/2011/08/beating-women-and-dead-children-why-i.html

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

"We are a free speech site," Erik says. "We don't want to be in a position of deciding what is and isn't offensive, nor would we be capable of deciding what's offensive and what's not."

Isn't that precious? They certainly don't give a shit about free speech anymore, were that ever really the case. Aren't there legalities that reddit has to contend with by hosting subs that allow people to post shit like that? I'm surprised the dudes that went there weren't doxxed and pine boxed.

[–]Apricot_Ibex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For real. The creator of many of the subs was even given a “pimp hat” award by Reddit’s official team and set up as mod for almost all NSFW content. They put a 49 year old creeper who posts pictures of teenage girls’ corpses as fap material in charge of their site, and applauded him for it. Ten years later, same fucking site, and women aren’t allowed to say that bio. men need to stay out of our shower rooms. Tells us allll we need to know.

Just look at this nasty pig faced pile of steaming shit. How has he NOT been pine boxed? After he was doxxed by Adrien Chen, he got scared. Whined that he lost his job, blamed everyone but himself. Apparently he tried to get into the porn industry after getting fired. Shocker. 🤮

https://gawker.com/5950981/unmasking-reddits-violentacrez-the-biggest-troll-on-the-web

[–]shveya 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I wish it were MSI album zombie girls! They were real corpses. Here's a disturbing article about the subreddit from a few years back. https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/reddit-cute-female-corpses-downvote-brigade/

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well. That was enlightening. That dumpster is like one massive social experiment.

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay OP, I'm going to go sub to all of that crap (But I'm going to unsub from anything that is actual porn or anime). Anyways, what's the likelihood 100% of those subs are around a year from now?

Let's make this scientific.