you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AugustiJade 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I will kink-shame them directly to their faces. Even better if they cry about it. Because I don't need to know what sort of weird shit complete strangers do behind closed doors. Somehow allowing homosexual men and women to marry like heterosexual couples meant we had to allow in all of this. Paedophiles are now trying to get in as well. Where does it stop at?

[–]Apricot_Ibex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Certain “kinks” (and by kinks I mean sexual predation, misogyny, abuse, outright rape, and pedophilia, which is what so many “kinks” are anyway) were out in the open way before the era of marriage equality. Chester the Molester in Hustler, Brooke Shields at age 10 completely nude in a Playboy publication in 1976...it’s whatever trendy media avenue of the day that men can exploit to force their kinks onto women and girls.

Edit: And good for you for kink shaming them to their faces. Kink “shaming” just means making people aware of the misogyny engrained into almost every single aspect of mainstream porn and “erotic” media. Men are getting away with murder via strangulation and “roughness” during sex and these idiots are worried about “kink shaming”!

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not a "somehow" effect. It was actively known by everyone for hundreds of years. I was just on an islamist area of the interwebs that said the same thing. Do I have to point you to archives of NAMBLA's site that admitted the link? They straight up said the reason they are maligned is due to a 'gay hating' society, as they put it.