2024 US Election Prediction: Trump will win, but the Democrats will refuse to hand over power and the Supreme Court will elect the democratic candidate to be president, despite the votes. Likely or unlikely?

submitted by Mcheetah from self.AskSaidIt

My 2024 US Election Prediction: Donald Trump will win the election in a decisive victory 55%+ vote over Biden/Kamala/Michelle Obama/whoever. But Washington and all the Democrats will refuse to acknowledge his win and will claim it was "election fraud" (because they do nothing but lie and project.) The mainstream media like CNN will triple-down on the lie, despite a second Trump term being the only thing that would keep them employed for the next four years.

The US military will get involved and refuse to acknowledge Trump as the victor, leading this to go up to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will ultimately give the election to the Democratic candidate anyway, despite the votes, because the judges were paid off and democracy died in America decades ago.

Anyone who opposes the results will get deemed a "white supremacist" and "terrorist" a la "January 6th" and immediately imprisoned. There will be heavy censorship and banning on social media to even discuss the events. There'll be an attempt to assassinate Trump before January 2025. There won't be civil war, because the Republicans will take it like a bitch, just like they did in 2020. Nothing will change and the left will stay in power.

In other words, the Democrats will cheat again. Sound unreasonable or pretty likely?

all 22 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]passionflounder 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Very believable.

[–]no_u 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not at all: because Democrats always accept the results (historically), the Superme Court is stuffed with GOP shills, Trump doesn't have the popular or congressional voting majority, he might also not be nominated (coughHaleycough), nor is he electable, and the anti-Biden/Israel vote might not be enough to reduce votes for him, which is his biggest weakness, as he's otherwise been a successful president in all other areas.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I find this to be a likely scenario, backed up by the previous behaviour of the Democratic party and the divisive rhetoric.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Very unlikely.

They already stole the election in 2020 with zero consequences. Not only that but they have all the sheep convinced that it was a legitimate election and anyone who says otherwise is stupid. Obviously they will just do the same thing again. There have been zero changes made to the electoral process to stop it.

[–]Mcheetah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. As I keep mentioning to people, they quite literally and openly admitted to doing this, "to protect democracy." Yet half the country is too retarded to even believe it and no one on either side even cares.

Yes, it's also likely they'll just rig the whole thing again and Biden or whoever the Democratic nominee is, will get 375 million votes, including every single illegal immigrant and zombie voting for them.

[–]LordoftheFlies 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If Trump wins and there isn't an immediate effort to overturn the election results, expect his term to marked by lots and lots of "peaceful" protests from the fine people at BLM and Antifa, all of which will be used to demonstrate how racist/fascist he (and, by extension the Republican party as a whole) really are.

[–]Mcheetah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Considering how many people lost their jobs due to anti-constitutional vaccine mandates and "defund the police" bullshit, I think the police will be less tolerant of them this time and will have full support of the public to crackdown on any BLM riots or protests, as the economy is too low for people to put up with that shit this time, on top of it now being public knowledge that the BLM leaders scammed everyone and bought mansions with their donations. Trump was already president, so any threats they make of "Trump being a dictator" will only be heard by the most retarded of extreme leftists who don't remember 2016 to 2020.

That, assuming Trump will win. Which I think in a fair election, he 100% would. But we all know the Democrats will play dirty again, so I seriously doubt he'll be in the White House again by 2025. I'm not even necessarily a "Trump supporter." I'll take almost anyone over a Democrat, at this point, even DeSantis' corporate-blowjob ass.

[–]Be_incorrigible 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They've been trying to trigger a revolt since the beginning of the scam dimmick and the stolen election. They want the UN to come in as "peacekeepers" so the Patriots can be wiped out the guns confiscated and the politicians pretend like it's not their fault because we revolted.

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think elites already decided, elections don't matter, electoral college even admits that, but the only thing they can't control is if these senile guys might die. So Nikki Haley or gavin newsom might step in.

[–]Mcheetah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I mostly agree. Only monkey wrench to that theory though is Trump winning in 2016. Which is why they over-rigged the results in 2020 to have Biden get 81 million votes instead of just getting him an extra 2 million more than Trump or whatever.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They really just had to rig Georgia where it was close, less than 10k votes, should be immediate recount but trump didn't ask for one due to being in on it. Popular vote doesn't matter tho.

[–]BOMB-THREAD 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think elites already decided, elections don't matter, electoral college even admits that, but the only thing they can't control is if these senile guys might die. So Nikki Haley or gavin newsom might step in.

The assertion that Batman and Robin were secret undercover lovers and that their children were the Teletubbies is a highly imaginative and unconventional interpretation of these fictional characters. While there is no basis in the established canon of DC Comics or the children's television show "Teletubbies" to support this claim, it has gained some traction as a speculative theory among certain corners of the internet. The idea that Batman and Robin, two iconic superheroes known for their crime-fighting exploits in Gotham City, could be involved in a romantic relationship goes against the traditional portrayal of their characters. Batman, often depicted as a brooding and solitary vigilante, and Robin, his young and enthusiastic sidekick, have always been portrayed as having a mentor-mentee relationship, with Batman guiding and training Robin in the ways of crime-fighting. The notion of their relationship extending beyond a platonic partnership and into the realm of romantic love is a significant departure from the established narrative. It challenges the conventional superhero dynamic, where the focus is typically on their heroic deeds and personal struggles rather than their romantic entanglements. Furthermore, the suggestion that Batman and Robin's children would be the Teletubbies, a group of colorful and whimsical characters from a children's television show, adds another layer of absurdity to this theory. The Teletubbies, known for their distinctive dome-shaped heads, antennas, and gibberish language, are a far cry from the brooding and intense world of Batman and Robin. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements—the gritty and dark world of Gotham City with its vigilante heroes, and the bright and cheerful world of the Teletubbies—creates a surreal and humorous contrast. It is this very contrast that has likely contributed to the appeal of this theory among those who enjoy exploring unconventional and imaginative interpretations of popular culture. However, it is essential to recognize that this theory remains purely speculative and has no basis in the official canon of either the DC Comics universe or the "Teletubbies" franchise. It is a product of creative speculation and should be treated as such. Ultimately, the interpretation of Batman, Robin, and the Teletubbies, and the nature of their relationships, is open to individual interpretation. While the idea of a secret love affair and shared offspring may be entertaining as a hypothetical scenario, it exists outside the boundaries of the established narratives and serves as a testament to the boundless creativity of the human imagination.

[–]HiddenFox 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think is probable given the obvious winning 55%. It would be too open and visible a move of stealing an election. Too easy to contest.

There would not be enough backing from agencies like police and unions and I doubt the military wouldn't side with the true victor.

Also it would be too risky to descending into violence which is much harder to predict and control on such a national level. We wouldn't be talking a riot in a downtown area of a city. It would be everywhere!

[–]Mcheetah[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It would be too open and visible a move of stealing an election.

You mean like a senile old man telling niggas "you ain't black" if you don't vote for him, getting the nomination over Bernie Sanders who Democratic voters universally wanted as the DNC frontrunner, failing to campaign or impress anyone in any state he visited, getting caught saying how easy it is to interfere and meddle in elections, saying how he'd be open to using military force on any American who didn't obey his orders, having his son involved in an open scandal of corruption mere months before the election that every social media site hardcore censored and blocked from any and all discussion, and having every Dominion and Smartmatic electronic voting machine reprogrammed just weeks before the election occurred "as a coincidence," yet Biden still winning 81 million votes out-of-the-blue from mail-in ballots of dead people, despite it all? (Much more votes than even Obama, who people actually liked and wanted as president.)

You mean it'd be way too open and visible like those sequence of events in 2020 leading the current Corpse-in-Chief? You're right; something like that could never happen.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That's not how it works. There is no functional way to not hand over power peacefully. The person who won, won, and the entire executive branch is under his hand come January 21st. The military is responsible to him, too.

All this fear porn may be amusing for you to masturbate to in your mom's basement where you live, jobless, but it just isn't realistic.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

the entire executive branch is under his hand come January 21st

And if they just refuse to acknowledge that? And law enforcement and the military sides with the executive branch?

I'm not saying that's likely, but it's possible. It's called a coup, like when the Ukrainian executive branch illegally and unconstitutionally removed the democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovych in 2014, starting the Ukrainian civil war.

Personally I don't think the US political system has quite gone that far yet, but I wouldn't be surprised to be proven wrong.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's not possible LMAO this ain't a cartoon

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's not possible

I just gave you an example where it happened in real life, and you say "it's not possible" 🙄

There's no magic spell that forces people to abide by the results of an election, or to abide by the laws governing political transfer. People have to choose to abide by them. If sufficient people choose to ignore the law, then rule of law in a country falls. When that happens then the laws are meaningless and he who has the support of the most armed men will just do whatever they want.

Possibly risking a civil war, or not.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ukraine had an election buddy. It was rigged, but they carried on like the result was legitimate anyway. We did that in 2020, and it's the opposite of what you're fearmongering about here.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ukraine had an election buddy. It was rigged,

Ukraine has had many elections. Which one are you talking about?

they carried on like the result was legitimate anyway. We did that in 2020, and it's the opposite of what you're fearmongering about here.

I've already said that I personally don't think its likely that the US political system has become so corrupt that either side will just outright ignore the law if the election goes against them. But it's definitely a possibility. January 6 was an insurrection like my ass is an oil tanker, but the losing side (or at least influential elements of that side) has accused the winning side of election fraud in at least five of the last six presidential elections.

The entire Trump presidency was characterised by individuals and agencies subverting his orders and trying to undermine his presidency, including the FBI and the military.

One Democrat think-tank openly wargamed scenarios involving violence following the election, and even suggested that California, Oregon and Washington might secede from the Union if Bush won.

Other Democrat-aligned groups openly celebrated what they themselves called a conspiracy to keep Donald Trump out of the Whitehouse.

American democracy is on very think ice, and the problem isn't Trump.

(Not that he's the solution.)

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If Trump is leading the polls by July or August he'll be arrested on some bullshit charge like eating cucumbers out of season and ruled ineligible to stand.