Is socks stupid?

submitted by Gravi from self.AskSaidIt

Is he stupid? Is he a poopyhead? Is he violating the laws of not-stupidity?

Is he..... A SHILL?

all 59 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]SMCAB 15 insightful - 6 fun15 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 6 fun -  (13 children)

Socks is the worst kind of human, for one reason and one reason only.

It isn't that he's a massive fat fuck.

It isn't that he cries when the honey mussie is empty.

It isn't that he uses his stepdads credit card for Anime porn.

It's that he plays the role of an intellectual online(that watches CNN hahahahahahaha), while everything he stands for promotes his own demise, and he and his ilk are gonna take you right with him. It's easy to make fun, but he's more dangerous to your liberty than anyone else alive.

He's the epitome of a useful idiot.

[–]Entropick 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

I'm ashamed that I feel the need to positively identify that which is likely obvious to yourself and the others....but.....he is jewish ?

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Entropick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    interesting

    [–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    "OMG! OMG! THE JOOS!? 😲 RUN FER THE HILLS BOYS! THEY'RE A COMIN' FER YA!"

    [–]VraiBleu 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Take your meds.

    [–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Take your meds.

    Medicine is a JOOISH CONSPIRACY.

    [–]solder0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Probably not the worst, but it's hard to pick sometimes, so I largely agree with this. On the Leary quadrants, a socks personality falls into "I'm not okay, you're not okay." That's a dangerous personality, truly. A nihilist with a death wish that wants to bring others down with them, punishment doesn't even work.

    Additionally...and this is a little unnerving, I'm not even sure if the socks accounts here really are socks. I've met more than one person with this type of personality, so I could be wrong, but there's a chance that there's more than one person behind the keyboard of every socks account. I'm serious.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Interesting. I had never heard about that.

      [–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Socks' subreddit where multiple people were communicating about how to avoid Saidit's cloudflare bans for logging in too many times

      That may or may not have been one of the discussions - I don't know and don't recall, nor is it important - but it was not on a subreddit of mine. I didn't moderate a subreddit at that time, nor would there be a subreddit devoted to that issue of temporary cloudflare bans.

      The comment that easily gets a username banned is: the opinion that Tucker Carlson should be slowly tortured to death

      My original username was banned for that reason. Now I use any username that comes to mind. I suppose it's time to retire the current username.

      [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      My original username was banned for that reason. Now I use any username that comes to mind. I suppose it's time to retire the current username.

      Confession by projection?

      Thanks socks.

      [–]shitfourbrains 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      just you wait until i finish my bot... you will be wishing for the good old days when your biggest worry was socks.

      var xx=document.querySelectorAll(".first");

for(var lp=0;lp<xx.length;lp++)
{
console.log(lp+") "+xx[lp].firstChild.href);
}//for

return;

      [–]topiary2 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

      He's retarded. Usually his types get paid to cock suck the establishment, but I think he does it for free.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      I agree with you. I think he doesn’t get paid. He’s angry at the world. And we have to suffer because of it.

      [–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Someone who disagrees with you, merely disagrees. Get over it.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Are you just an attention whore?

      Daddy never loved you?

      [–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      On a website with 30 active users? At least I don't want my mouth raped. That wouldn't be any fun, I would guess.

      [–][deleted] 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

      Socks is a douchy mcpoopypants lol

      [–]HibikiBlack 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      All of the above?...

      [–]EternalSunset 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Yes to all + also a glownigger.

      [–]Entropick 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      I'm genuinely curious as to its mandate, mission, intentions and origins. I'm assuming this is JIDF type/sort of operator? Act.il? The more I learn about the PR mechanisms behind zionist operations the more fascinated I am. They know damn well what some of those people are capable of doing and have done! Covering it up as an entire industry and/or military cause is super duper interesting. Maybe its worth a book.

      [–]Megatron95 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

      He's the shit you scrape off the sole of your shoe.

      [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Yes and yes and yes and yes

      [–]Alphix 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

      I refuse to think people could dumb enough to post what he writes in good faith. Remains that he's either paid to post the BS he does, or he's just totally deranged.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      It’s not in good faith. He’s arguing because he is angry, and fucking with people. He’s like a modern troll.

      I am not convinced he is a leftist.

      [–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

      Again - someone who disagrees isn't nuts. Chill.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

      It’s ironic when you say chill. I was on your side until, I think, our last conversation. You wouldent stop with the add hominems, and you wouldent stop with the bad faith arguments.

      I used to think, or feel, I gained something from our conversations, maybe even new perspective. A raging leftist point of view. Which I disagree with, but can appreciate.

      The last time we talked, it made me feel disgusting, bad vibes.

      [–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      Sorry - if I am insulted, I return the insult. I've discovered over 2 years on Saidit that users will tend to forget that they insulted me first and are shocked that I insulted them thereafter.

      I'm also not a raging leftist. I'm much worse: a centrist. There aren't that many raging leftists in the US. Most voters will admit that they are centrist. And compared to other far right-leaning social media places (Parler, Truth Social, communities.win &c) Saidit is somewhat more centrist than those.

      Anyhow, I don't like rape, of any kind, so this might have influenced my responses. Apologies.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      You insulted me first.

      [–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      More troll bullshit from you. Try, just for the sake of changing bad habits, just once to say something accurate.

      You insulted me first. Re-read the comments under this post:

      Zommy 10 insightful - 4 fun - 3 days ago

      Socks is a douchy mcpoopypants lol

      Bother someone else, Mr Poopy Pants.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      I mean 2 years ago.

      [–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      he's either paid

      Very kind of you to think I should be paid for my impressive comments.

      [–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      he's either paid

      Very kind of you to think I should be paid for my impressive comments.

      Confession, by confession.

      [–]jet199 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

      He's Yabbit in 20 years time

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Except yabbit has a recognisable sense of humour

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Yea. I cherish yabbit. He’s a great addition to the website.

      [–]Zapped 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Socks is the straw that stirs the Saidit milkshake, especially since JasonCarswell took his ball and went home. There are several users here that add flavor, but socks keeps the user base moving.

      [–]newguy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      He's intentionally acting dumb to make this forum look dumb, and since he's been doing it non-stop for months, I'd guess he's paid

      [–]WoodyWoodPecker 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      YES, NEXT QUESTION? /s

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]g0ldfish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Indeed - especially on Saidit.

        [–]passionflounder 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        In the immortal words of George Carlin, he is minimally exceptional.

        [–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        God I love George.

        [–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

        I don't think he's dumb, he just believes bad sources.

        [–]Alphix 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        And after being argued with and shown evidence of being wrong, STILL believes BS? He's either dumb or evil.

        [–]g0ldfish 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        This is obviously wrong and certainly unfair.

        For example, my latest experiment: https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/bbxt/91_criminal_charges

        Saidit's anti-corruption yelping over the years came to an abrupt conceptual end with that post. (No Saiditor in that thread - other than I - wants Trump's corruption to be addressed AND no Saiditor was able to propose an argument against one of those 91 charges. It was one of the most obvious slam dunks in Saidit's history, proving that many Saiditors support political corruption, they parrot the talking points of far right disinformation news media, and they are hypocrites when they've complained about the lack of attention to political corruption in the past. Those 91 charges barely scratch the surface of numerous examples of the Trump crime family's corruption, and yet why would anyone on Saidit want to support him by calling those 91 charges erroneous? What's very good about this is that the far right social media could elevate Trump to GOP presidential candidate nomination - much to the chagrin of many in the GOP - and it's already well-known that he'd lose against the corpse of Biden. The main problem is that Trump's supporters have caused a social rift in the US that is dividing Americans. Very sad.)

        [–]Megatron95 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

        Do you actually think he acts in good faith?

        [–]Musky 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

        And someone should defend Socks, might as well be me. I think he makes this place interesting. Mostly we all agree with each other and that's not really conducive to conversation. Socks argues the wrong side, we don't have many people who do that.

        [–]Megatron95 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

        Why would you defend someone who constantly insults the users?

        [–]Musky 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        Are you kidding, when he has his meltdowns it's hilarious.

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        This is true. I happily defend socks but find him entertaining in his frustrations 😄

        [–]g0ldfish 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        Users insult him constantly, and much before he responds in kind. It's not a big deal on a "free speech" website like Saidit.

        [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        That's not true at all.

        He randomly called me a cunt just because I posted a funny story about Meghan Markle (who he simps over).

        [–]g0ldfish 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        That's not something I would do. I've never called you a cunt (I don't call women cunts). What was the username? I would defend Harry & Meghan, however, because they've been treated unfairly.

        EDIT: I've searched for 'meghan' in all of your posts dating back 2 years and see 3, 2 of which have no replies, and 1 of which has boring replies, none by me. You are lying, Jet (unless you can find the post and the response; I genuinely don't remember responding like that. It's also not the way I respond to your comments or posts, which 99% of the time have been very polite, because I am a fan of your quips, which can be wonderfully sharp-witted and unexpected amongst these Americans' crass comments. You are of course a jerk to me, and I am not sure why, nor does it matter, but the least you can do is try to avoid lying.).

        [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Ahh yes, the Saidit search which famously works perfectly every time?

        Do you never engage your brain even slightly? Why would I lie about something so specific?

        https://saidit.net/s/Entertainment/comments/7ixe/apparently_its_bias_to_ask_why_she_keeps_holding/

        You are a morally bankrupt person who uses left wing politics to try to cover up your terrible behaviour towards people. No one else here constantly gets kicked off for constantly threatening violence. Do you never ask yourself why that is if you are supposedly the good guy? It's because no one else here of any shade of politics thinks the way you do about other people.

        In case he deletes

        That's not something I would do. I've never called you a cunt (I don't call women cunts). What was the username? I would defend Harry & Meghan, however, because they've been treated unfairly.

        EDIT: I've searched for 'meghan' in all of your posts dating back 2 years and see 3, 2 of which have no replies, and 1 of which has boring replies, none by me. You are lying, Jet (unless you can find the post and the response; I genuinely don't remember responding like that. It's also not the way I respond to your comments or posts, which 99% of the time have been very polite, because I am a fan of your quips, which can be wonderfully sharp-witted and unexpected amongst these Americans' crass comments. You are of course a jerk to me, and I am not sure why, nor does it matter, but the least you can do is try to avoid lying.).

        [–]g0ldfish 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Think about this for a second, Jet. You want to make a general argument about all of my comments by remembering a comment I made TWO YEARS AGO?? Seriously? I wonder when was your last normal relationship with a human. This is nuts. (A lot can happen in 2 years.)

        Also, your other comments are helpful, because I didn't know that you had this much irrational hatred for me, and I don't know why. Duly noted.

        Anyway, let's look at the "morally bankrupt" argument? Do you realize that I am one of only 2 or 3 users who argue AGAINST the genocide of Ukrainians, AGAINST laws that limit women's rights, AGAINST political corruption, AGAINST spreading COVID, etc, etc. If I agreed with users who promote Christo-fascist, authorian, genocidal disinformation for the far right, like the others here, THAT would be morally bankrupt. Also keep in mind that it's perfectly normal for fascists at Saidit NOT to like non-fascists, and to want to limit the free speech, voting rights, human rights, reproductive rights, educational rights, etc. etc. of the non-fascists. If Saiditors agreed with me, I'd certainly be morally bankrupt. I've explained this many times in the past 2.5 years. It's good to be different on this website. I've also explained which right wing issues I agree with and which left wing issues I agree with, and how I am more of a centrist, but I am not explaining that again.

        Now let's look at that 2-year-old comment you've NOT FORGOTTEN:

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago

        Perhaps for /s/shittyphotoshop

        No need to try so hard to be a racist cunt

        Yep - I think that was me. Now consider your reading comprehension: I noted that you "need not TRY so hard to be a racist cunt." What that means is that you were trying to be a racist cunt, rather than denote that you were indeed a racist cunt. It's about a photoshopped image spread by racist cunts in social media 2 years ago. Though I did not explicitly say so at the time, I can clarify that everyone sharing that photoshopped image was indeed a racist cunt. For example the top comment to your post was:

        sproketboy 3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago

        Barren whore.

        I suspect you voted on that. Racist cunt news media in the UK at that time claimed that she was never pregnant, and you and other racist Saiditors supported that attack on Meghan. Why? Can you think of 2 words that would describe the people who wanted to share that photoshopped disinformation? I certainly can.

        [–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Hah, fuck no, but he's not dumb.

        [–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpw9TkeZHoA

        [–]g0ldfish 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSCgfI3OG7s

        [–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        sock puppet. these folks are literal tools and lack all creativity after giving up their free will

        [–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Who? I never noticed it him whatever. Never saw the user name before. I'm not knowing. It could be fun to look up but I don't think I'll do it.