This is obviously wrong and certainly unfair.

For example, my latest experiment: https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/bbxt/91_criminal_charges

Saidit's anti-corruption yelping over the years came to an abrupt conceptual end with that post. (No Saiditor in that thread - other than I - wants Trump's corruption to be addressed AND no Saiditor was able to propose an argument against one of those 91 charges. It was one of the most obvious slam dunks in Saidit's history, proving that many Saiditors support political corruption, they parrot the talking points of far right disinformation news media, and they are hypocrites when they've complained about the lack of attention to political corruption in the past. Those 91 charges barely scratch the surface of numerous examples of the Trump crime family's corruption, and yet why would anyone on Saidit want to support him by calling those 91 charges erroneous? What's very good about this is that the far right social media could elevate Trump to GOP presidential candidate nomination - much to the chagrin of many in the GOP - and it's already well-known that he'd lose against the corpse of Biden. The main problem is that Trump's supporters have caused a social rift in the US that is dividing Americans. Very sad.)