Is the Pfizer COVID vaccine safe? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm 19

What's the vibe among American conservatives? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]Pink 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Almost every problem that faces modern society can be attributed to a poorly educated populace.

troll

How to have good, trad, LTR oriented dates? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for the advice. My experience in the last few months has shown me it's obviously very based in reality. I went through every girl in my area on one of the dating apps. 10 unique girls, most only lasted 1 date, one I dated for a couple of months. She seemed perfect and I really started to like her. After we made out for the first time and I didn't perform because I was drunk and she said she was nervous she threw me away like I was nothing, the disgusting whore. Women without children are truly worthless beings incapable of love, all the more if they've been boned by multiple guys. I'm done looking for something serious on those apps; I'm evidently too young and the women are too ruined. All your advice was right, I need more friends so I can keep women around longer, increase my chances of finding a girl too good for the apps (as if), and I should probably just bone hos until I'm good enough at sex that I can properly please the next secret-whore that dates me for two months. Thank you and postmodernity delenda est.

How to have good, trad, LTR oriented dates? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyway, tt's not clear what you are trying to accomplish here. And you probably have too much faith in females being able to make a conscious decision without getting carried away by their "feelings".

I want a tradwife. And yes female decision making is stupid, I know that. I just don't know how to please these so-called conservative girls. Sadly I have to please them because their fathers can't arrange a marriage with me in 2021.

How to have good, trad, LTR oriented dates? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The redpillers are a full SD lower in IQ than this place and basically gave me a bunch of retarded nonsense responses along the lines of "mup bup po dup bix nood u blupilld cracka"

Why do you say I'm clowning around? Did you read my post or just skim? There's no special show I'm just not trying to make out with them quick because I expect they don't want that since they're allegedly conservative

How to have good, trad, LTR oriented dates? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tradwife material

How to have good, trad, LTR oriented dates? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dating isn't "trad" by any past society's standards

Any good books/papers on ancient/medieval courting processes? I'd like to know more about them. It may be the case I that I need to fuck quick in order to secure a girl these days. No kiss before marriage is probably optimal but I can't put a nuwoman under the authority of her father by taking it slow with her.

How to have good, trad, LTR oriented dates? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds like she had this prepared beforehand.

Yeah I'm not sure how she did it, I don't think it was on the spot because she never got up to text. It would have been something where she wanted to spend some time at my place but not all night

How to have good, trad, LTR oriented dates? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that's big talk, where do you meet women? 40% of relationships start online now. It's not inherently degenerate

Why we are in this situation? by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]Pink 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree with /u/marc_gee , the elite are only about half Jewish by my estimations. It would be impossible without the gentile elite complying. Jewishness is a very important explanatory factor, but not the only one.

Is Logical Positivism pozzed? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I remember that logical positivism had a logical flaw but it is 10 years ago and I don't remember what it was to be honest.

You're probably thinking of the bad criticism that "the verification principle is not verifiable." The reason this is wrong is that the verification principle is an analytic statement.

We know from maths that not every true statement can be proven true. This is at least one flaw, but I don't think it was the one that made me quit that philosophy back then.

That's Godel's theorem and it doesn't apply to language/the verification principle. For any system of signs there must be a given ground level. There is no way to defer and "prove" 2=2. It simply is. We don't run into a problem like that by simply noting that what you experience is all you have access to, so for synthetic statements to be factually meaningful they need to refer to a set of experience you can imagine.

Is Logical Positivism pozzed? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't particularly care about this to be honest but I would recommend reading some people who have an Organic worldview rather than the Mechanistic-Materialist one. This chapter of Imperium might be of interest, I recommend reading the whole book.

I read the chapter. It was interesting and I agree in spirit with his exhortations. But insofar as that is claimed to be an intellectual work, it is not. It reminds me a lot of my way of thinking from 15-17 years old. I can't say that I learned anything from that chapter except that the author feels that the power elite are normatively shallow because it's all unverifiable statements and unjustified claims otherwise. For example:

It is still materialism to confuse a civilization with factories, homes, and the collectivity of installations. Civilization is a higher reality, manifesting itself through human populations, and within these, through a certain spiritual stratum, which embodies at highest potential the living Idea of the Culture. This Culture creates religions, forms of architecture, arts, States, Nations, Races, Peoples, armies, wars, poems, philosophies, sciences, weapons and inner imperatives. All of them are mere expressions of the higher Reality, and none of them can destroy it.

These statements are either unverifiable or meaningless tautologies that point to concepts that refer to no sense content. Therefore all this talk is merely emotional exhortation saying that he feels like our culture is transcendent and will never be destroyed by the rootless cosmopolitans etc. I feel him but on an intellectual level this is worthless and I happen to think that that's dangerously optimistic because the reality is that white genocide is the end of white culture. It won't float back down from the 3rd realm, ever.

And despite this I'm not the materialist he speaks of. To me a civilization is something like the expression of a racial-national will over time. This is like talking about transcendent racial spirit except it's actually verifiable & true.

Is Logical Positivism pozzed? by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They define metaphysical statements as those which are not verifiable and not a tautology. An example that is given is a real quote which I remember as something along the lines of (paraphrased) "lines of Being unfold into evolution but do not enter into it itself." Since a statement is verifiable when the speaker/listener know what sense-content is predicted by it, the point is that metaphysical statements such as these carry no factual content. Statements may still carry emotional meaning for the speaker or listener but they can't say anything about the world unless they relate to sensations in some way, since everything we perceive is through one type of sensation or another.

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As I said, we had pro-white laws when whites were white nationalist, which disproves you.

Yeah and then the whites were subverted out of it by elites, which disproves you. Smh

It also proves the elite do follow the mainstream ideology, the masses, to a large extent.

No it's the reverse to a large extent because the elites own the media.

Average Redditor does DNA test hoping he's Jewish, and is aghast when he finds out he's White by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably fake

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's all data you fucking negrobrain

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whites got subverted out of white nationalism for many reasons such as the holocaust and the resulting anti-racist sympathy people felt.

This is a fucking retarded NRx line that makes no sense -- nobody even gave a shit about the Holocaust until the 70s when it was shilled by the Jewish media. See Unz on this.

Again, are you a teenager or an adult? I feel like I'm wasting my time with you.

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They still told me, that I am a guilty person due to some historical crimes, that some of our people had committed in the past.

Because that's what the Jewish media told them

I like race mixing, change my mind. by IsraelDid911 in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Gay troll , but I'll take the bait. 1 is wrong, hybrids are fragile and instead of having 100 IQ kids you get 90 IQ kids. 2, 3, and 4 are degenerate and stupid. QED

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nobody denies the influence of (((white))) journalist and teachers

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I can't engage in a discussion with you like that

Copout, there's like 2 insults. You evidently can't respond to what I said.

If 50% of whites were white nationalist, we would see some media and government supporting our positions.

No we wouldn't because all whites were white nationalists and got subverted out of it by the media, lol

Post age? I'll engage with you if you're a teenager. If you're an adult this isn't worth my time.

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This sentence is fucked, you need to translate that to me.

Is English not your 1st language or something? lmao

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

y, but they will usually adhere to society's norms of what is considered moral

They make the norms.

If white nationalism were normalized in the masses, many of the elites would be supportive of white nationalism.

No, the only way to do this at the moment is to start a counter elite and I almost guarentee this would cause a civil war in America. Our best bet is probably Europe and maybe Canada. The US will never be white again. Partitioning is maybe viable but that wouldn't be allowed to be done peacefully unless it's obvious that the antiwhites will sustain massive losses. And as of right now there will be no conflict, just the slow destruction of white people because our elites are weak or subverted.

I gave you lots of examples of the elite following the masses

No you didn't. You literally asserted that BLM & sheeeit is spontaneous. Lol

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Some people think everything depends only on what the elites do, not the masses. However, the elites usually follow the masses. Their ideologies are influenced by whatever the masses believe. For example, elite white democrats kneeled to support BLM and will do anything blacks say, republican politicians won't speak against BLM or diversity, hundreds of white CEO's donated hundreds of millions of dollars to BLM and anti-racism (Bank of America alone donated 1 billion), and over a thousand companies are boycotting faceberg over its hate speech policies. These were examples of the elite following the masses and the media as the masses became outraged over police brutality.

This is totally wrong and anyone who agrees with you is an idiot or a defeatist. I know this sounds harsh but it needs to be said.

Now to elaborate on how we know you're wrong -- think about for 2 seconds why the masses are doing this BLM shit. Is it because of magical dust in the air suddenly making white people antiwhite? Is it because being told that all white people should die on Twitter makes white people suddenly give a shit what antiwhite minorities want in white countries? Is it because in like 3 generations white people evolved to be cucked and hate themselves? No, no, and no. It's because of Jewish propaganda. Therefore the masses follow the elites. QED.

On a deeper level, this is just self evident. Are you so out of touch with yourself that you don't notice the amazing power of propaganda on a personal level? Are you so blind that you don't realize most people are parrots? Do you not just NoticeTM how stupid and docile most people are? How much of the intolerable they constantly tolerate without notice? So what, was their line just crossed when a cop restrained a violent felon who later died because he was overdosed on drugs? No, because the masses have no lines. Intolerable lines are crossed every day. The education system exists. 2A is a dead letter. 4A is a dead letter. Purposefully low speed limits and the harvesting of money with the threat of deadly force is only not done through taxation because the 100 IQ soldier LARPers needed something to do. Every tax dollar that is spent on a middle school English "teacher" and every bullshit traffic ticket that is given crosses the line but the masses don't care. Why? Because they're told what to care about and they obey. Studies show I'm right, but they're totally redundant because what I'm saying is necessarily true based on common, everyday observation and you know this if you're emotionally capable of considering it. I hope you're like 16 because if you're over about 20 it probably shows that you aren't emotionally capable of considering this point. If you're a teenager it's possible you're just doing a Moldbug and theorizing with no data and are therefore parroting a view that you've been taught to believe because you haven't had the time to question it yet.

I get tired of proving the sky is blue with mass spectrometer studies that engage in multivariate analysis vs. every other known color but if you want to see the data that shows the obvious see Sean Last's "Empirical Examination of the JQ" and Alt Hype's video "They don't care about you." (Titles may be off a bit).

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Every single issue listed in the text bellow this line and EVERY SINGLE proposed solution depends on the mercy of the Jews

True, but if you had read OP (I don't blame you for not bothering, but "this is too long durrr" makes you look like the stupid one) you would have seen that he's retarded as his answer to the JQ is:

Some people think everything depends only on what the elites do, not the masses. However, the elites usually follow the masses. Their ideologies are influenced by whatever the masses believe.

Normally people who hold this belief are incapable of actually stating it because they can follow a the chain of implications well enough to see that this is literally impossible. So they have to >imply it constantly by appealing to "we" and "society" and making arguments like "but Jews are only 2%" which rely on the above as an implicit premise.

How would you deal with Christianity? by SecureTheInevitable in debatealtright

[–]Pink 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Christian tradition is based and I'm quite amiable towards it. However I do think that I'll never be able to literally believe it when it comes to the literal doctrine of the Bible. It's too self contradictory and externally contradictory. It's pretty much what you would expect if men made it up. But the tradition is way different than the esoterica of the Bible. The Bible might preach universalism is some places but traditionally that was never a thing. And historically 99% of people who attacked Christianity "cuz it's not true" were just trying to dismantle the tradition. I mean even 1000, 2000 years ago, intelligent scribes must have realized it's not literally, fully true just based on a comparative reading of the Gospels.

So the traditionalism is based, but the current institutions are pozzed and the scriptural literalists are defeatists. I think you agree with me at least on the latter. These are the folk that disregard all lively tradition and cherry pick some lines from the Bible with the goal of communicating "Don't do anything because the Apocalypse is coming and Jesus will save us from clown world." This is defeatism even if you fully believe in Christianity since there's really no evidence that the Apocalypse is coming in our life time. The you know whos could very well rule for 10,000 years before the 7 seals are broken.

I literally just call them out for defeatism. That's the best word to use I've found. It's cool because you also get secular defeatists as well that are issues for the same reasons. People like the Qtards who think daddy Trump will save us if we just elect him one more time. Babbling about secret indictments is defeatism. There's also tards like Moldbug who say "do nothing". That's also defeatism. All these camps are shit because they're LARPing defeatists.

[Original Research] Jews Account for Over 22% of the Wealth of the Top 100 Billionaires by AFutureConcern in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

44% of the Americans on this list are Jewish, or nearly half, despite Jews making up 2% of the population.

Thank you for counting. From this we can surmise that if billionaires mostly control domestic policy and culture, then Jews contribute to about half of it at least.

[Original Research] Jews Account for Over 22% of the Wealth of the Top 100 Billionaires by AFutureConcern in debatealtright

[–]Pink 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your country was filled with Jews by the 17th century as you reveal your knowledge of below.

The Average Redditor; or, Der Ewige Hedonist by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If a part of being a spiteful mutant is wanting to change the world then we are closer to that than the Hedonist, sadly. They're no longer spiteful, that might have been 100 or 200 years ago. They are victorious mutants.

Blackpilled video: Black TEENAGERS in high school talk about the degenerate things they've done. Homeschool now! by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]Pink 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Add in my user name and you've got a shitty psychedelic punk garage rock band: Pink Fornicator

[Original Research] Jews Account for Over 22% of the Wealth of the Top 100 Billionaires by AFutureConcern in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

China matters but not when it comes to Western domestic policy. So we should count domestic billionaires as well. If I have time I might just boil down the list you made later.

The Average Redditor; or, Der Ewige Hedonist by Pink in debatealtright

[–]Pink[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I thought it was quite a junevile mindset as I was an egoist in those days, but sadly I think he's older than me. It's probably that young teens tend to be egoists because that's the status quo and they haven't realized how gay it is. Except most people never realize that because they're stupid or gross.

[Original Research] Jews Account for Over 22% of the Wealth of the Top 100 Billionaires by AFutureConcern in debatealtright

[–]Pink 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it'd be way higher than 2% of Americans.

No that's not true at all. The billionaires go specifically crypto.

As for the Kochs, just look at this guys face, ancestry, and bio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_C._Koch

USSR? (((Dutch)))? Lmao

[Original Research] Jews Account for Over 22% of the Wealth of the Top 100 Billionaires by AFutureConcern in debatealtright

[–]Pink 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice work but I think this is an underestimate. I've seen before where it's 60% of billionaires are Jewish. Bezos and the Kochs are most likely Jewish or indistinguishable from one.

Blackpilled video: Black TEENAGERS in high school talk about the degenerate things they've done. Homeschool now! by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]Pink 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fornicator