We're not grooming the children, we just want them to play with drag queen action figures as toddlers.

submitted by iamonlyoneman from shop.mattel.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (24 children)

It's to exchange cheap Chinese plastic products for money. And that's the reason for selling anything to children - profit.

A simple view from a simple man, motivated solely by cash, and easily manipulated. And yet you have accused China of being behind this. What an odd choice. And you say their only motive is money? Nothing else? and you act as though it can't be more than one thing simultaneously. So, with that logic, China can sell meth to Americans and their only motivation is money? And that's fine? Correct?

It's a man in a dress, dancing for children. It is inappropriate as a toy, and promotes a sexual agenda. I'm sorry that you finds this 'bizarre', but it is in fact the reality of this, that you must finds bizarre. As that is the reality of the matter.

various Fisher Price executives

Stop pointing fingers at straw men. Stop making up narratives and attributing them to me. It's not as simple as you are.

You claim this to be motivated by money? Yes, that's the carrot in the form of ESG funds to push the agenda. You push the agenda for the WEF, you get paid. These are called useful idiots at best.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

And yet you have accused China of being behind this.

See I read it, and found that he accused China of being the place that manufacturers plastic toys most cheaply.

What the fuck did you read?

Yes, that's the carrot in the form of ESG funds to push the agenda. You push the agenda for the WEF, you get paid. These are called useful idiots at best.

Are you sure it's not simpler than that?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Speak of the Devil. I was just talking about you.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again: See I read it, and found that he accused China of being the place that manufacturers plastic toys most cheaply.

What the fuck did you read?

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

And yet you have accused China of being behind this. What an odd choice.

I assure you that, like all cheap plastic goods, those toys are made in China.

And you say their only motive is money? Nothing else?

That is correct. That is why both Fisher Price and Chinese factories exist: to make money.

So, with that logic, China can sell meth to Americans and their only motivation is money? And that's fine? Correct?

It may not be fine, but it is not child grooming. It's just drug trafficking.

Stop making up narratives and attributing them to me.

But you specifically agreed that grooming means "laying the foundation to have sex with a child when they reach the age of majority."

Just by accepting that definition, you specifically agreed that the Fisher Price executives who decided to sell these toys are doing so as part of some plot to fuck people who will turn 18 a decade or so from now.

So maybe you're having second thoughts about the definition now...

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

I'm having seconds thoughts about who you are. You're style seems very familiar. Like a bad faith Satanic Robot. Your ignorance of reality is profound and disturbing.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

You're sitting here telling me that Fisher Price is making RuPaul toys because the executives think it will help them diddle kids... and you think I have a problem with reality. Yeah, man, we'll just have to see how that works out for you.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

I'm not saying that. You are saying that. I'm saying that this toy is sexual. It was produced to secure ESG funds for profits. ESG funds used to promote lbgqt+ agendas. That groom kids. Which is part of a divide and conquer campaign orchestrated by the banks and foreign governments to destabilize the nation, using cash incentives.

It's not as simple as you are. Nor the claims that you are making. Honestly, are you controlled opposition?? Who's leading who here?

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Agendas can't groom kids.

Look, Questionable, this is in fact very simple. You and I both agree that grooming means "laying the foundation to have sex with a child as soon as they reach the age of majority."

So who the fuck is grooming whom? Out there somewhere, there's a five year old girl playing with a shitty plastic RuPaul. She's got it sitting on a dollhouse dining table with a little cup of tea in front of it, and she's making it say "Yes, Mr. Bunny, I agree that the tea is delicious."

So the question is: who is fucking this girl when she turns eighteen? Is a Fisher Price executive going to fuck her? Is the head of Charles Schwab, or Vanguard, or anyone else who provides ESG funding, going to fuck her? Is RuPaul going to fuck her? Is the director of GLAAD going to fuck her?

Apparently you think this girl has been marked as some old person's future wife. She's being brainwashed into being some wrinkly-balled old man's nubile little fucktoy as soon as it's legal. Because that's what grooming is.

So who the fuck is grooming the girl. Why can't you answer the question?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

Agendas can't groom kids

Grooming is an agenda.

I'm tired of training this bot.

You are a failure.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

That's correct. Agendas can't groom kids, they can't rent cars, they can't kick puppies, they can't go on murder sprees, they can't jerk off in the shower.

People do those things.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Wow. You are profoundly stupid.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

No, I just have a grasp on reality, unlike the guy who's apparently sitting here telling me an abstract concept is going to put its cock in a little girl's mouth.