We're not grooming the children, we just want them to play with drag queen action figures as toddlers.

submitted by iamonlyoneman from shop.mattel.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Wow. You are profoundly stupid.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

No, I just have a grasp on reality, unlike the guy who's apparently sitting here telling me an abstract concept is going to put its cock in a little girl's mouth.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Either you are a bot, or English is not your first language. If you are human, you are mentally ill.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I see you've just degenerated into generic playground shit.

It's not surprising. There's just no way to defend the argument that the concept of RuPaul is manipulating children into spreading their legs for older adults.

And when there's no way to defend an argument, all that's left is to spit generic insults and hope one of them sticks.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

This forum is not a place to describe children in a sexual manner. You should cease what you are doing immediately. And not repeat this behavior in the future.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

That is literally what you have been doing this entire time, from the headline on down: you saw a plastic RuPaul doll and you began talking about sex with children. That's the first place your mind went.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Again. There is something wrong with your brain.

This is you, and what you are visualizing:

RuPaul is manipulating children into spreading their legs for older adults.

Now you quote me.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The very first thing you said is that making RuPaul action figures is "child grooming."

Then you confirmed that "child grooming" refers to manipulating children into having sex with you as soon as they reach the age of majority.

That's right: you see a little plastic figure of a person, and your brain goes: "sex with children."

That's not on me, man. That's all you.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Supporting the argument that makes up the premise of this thread, does not mean I am sexualizing children. Where as you are actively visualizing and writing out scenarios. Retarded, dumb, bot. I don't care what you are. Stop writing up graphic depiction involving children. Still waiting on that quote mind you. Not that you're smart enough to understand what's going on.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Supporting the argument that makes up the premise of this thread, does not mean I am sexualizing children.

Of course it does. You saw a plastic toy and you posted "this means sex with children."

You brought sex with children up, apropos of absolutely nothing, because you dislike a cheap plastic toy.

You sexualized children, and now you're casting blame in every direction because you don't want it to be true. But it's clearly true to anyone with eyes and a brain.