What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]AmericanMuskrat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think the quality of life is going to be poor life should be terminated indiscriminately with consent. I believe we have a right to euthanasia.

should be more gun laws so that they are more difficult for criminals to obtain,

You can buy illegal guns off Snapchat, there should probably be a law about that. No buying illegal guns off Snapchat. It'll be double super illegal.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed, but only if the industrial over-breeding of humans ends too.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]goobandit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably that I don’t think y’all are that bad, in fact some of you are actually great.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]AXXA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most Americans agree that the first trimester is a reasonable cutoff for abortion.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/560213-solid-majority-says-abortion-should-be-illegal-after-first-trimester-poll

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]AmericanMuskrat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I have mentioned women shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's bound to be unpopular with over half of everyone. I mean maybe not here...

I also belief things would have been better if we did nothing with the pandemic. Just ignored it. And also if it killed way more people. It would be painful but there'd be a lot of opportunities for the survivors.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]socks 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

One of the answers on Reddit:

If a baby in the womb is clearly disabled or handicapped and destined for a life of mental or physical impairment, it should be totally cool to abort that fetus.

To this I would add: only within the first trimester (when most birth defects can be detected)

As for my most controversial comment on Saidit: vaccines help antibodies develop, thereby ending COVID19 lockdowns

My most controversial comment on /s/debatealtright: treat ALL others the way you'd want to be treated

My most controversial comment on Reddit: should be more gun laws so that they are more difficult for criminals to obtain, whereby law-abiding, careful citizens could have no trouble getting them

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]AmericanMuskrat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

My notification bar has spread far and wide, that whore.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]Mazurro 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Women are weaker, smaller, less inteligent than men and giving them privileges won't fix anything, because they(most of them) are unable to achieve things greater than men.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]soundsituation 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]JoGooD 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Apparently, being against vaccine mandate is very controversial.

But I think this one seems even more controversial: I believe human should stop industrial animal agriculture. It is worst than a genocide. It is like a reapeated genocide with torture and genetic selection.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I share this opinion, and it is controversial.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]AXXA 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That we are all sinners but God still loves every single one of us.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

van hagar era was just as good as the original van halen era.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]AXXA 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That the trans community and the white supremacist community are very much alike in their identity based politics and how fragile they are.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]AXXA 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That somebody saying "nigger" doesn't justify acting like a chimpanzee.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]AXXA 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That I have a right to chose what gets injected in my body.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope that it wipes out most of humanity (the morons).

it wont. look at certain thread starters.

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]Popper[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I guess the reason behind that opinion is controversial

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]Popper[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like it, good idea

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tough question since all of my opinions are controversial. Maybe that I support the covid vaccine because I hope that it wipes out most of humanity (the morons).

What is your most controversial opinion? by Popper in whatever

[–]ProstheticCranium 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We need to trebuchet the oligarchy into shark infested water, now, today👍👍

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan Talk Comedy by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]American_ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How did you "cancel" Joe Rogan?

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan Talk Comedy by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Avoiding the real question because he's to retarded to back up what he says.

you spelled 'retarded' right. we are getting somewhere! the 'real question'? the one a 3 year old could comprehend? or another one? youre getting wonky here.

I get it now, daddy skull fucked every last bit of common sense out of you, so now you just spurt out random things in defense.

'random'? id love to hear elaboration on this! you are fun, again keep these coming.

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan Talk Comedy by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]American_ 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Avoiding the real question because he's to retarded to back up what he says. I get it now, daddy skull fucked every last bit of common sense out of you, so now you just spurt out random things in defense. Must be hard grasping onto every last bit of reality

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan Talk Comedy by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1) wtf do you mean by "cancelling him", still havnt answered that

could this be confusing to anyone except a complete fucking idiot? not pointing fingers, just asking a general question to everyone.

2) sorry I forgot an E, sorry your little attitude had to point that out

no worries, just alluding to the fact that its a common thing with paid posters and dumbfucks. again, not point fingers anywhere directly-that would be against the rules!

3) cancel culture is for tranny faggots. Only weak willed individuals have to "cancel" some one when their view points go against what you believe in, i.e Twitter/reddit janny.

as eloquent as this reply is, it has nothing to do with what i was saying at all. sorry the neurons arent connecting for you here.

Can you rub your last 2 braincells together and give me a straight answer on how you cancelled him?

LOL!! can you please keep these coming? ive read a couple to a friend of mine, we still cant figure out if you are real or a paid poster. either way, shits great.

What would Jesus do? by hennaojichan in whatever

[–]adultmanhwa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kill and resurrect until you repent

Natural versus vaccine immunity by humancorpse in whatever

[–]humancorpse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i dont always post videos because i agree with the content, lol... i actually only watched maybe a minute of this one and just thought that it might be interesting for others.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And if anyone knows anything of 20th and 21st century 'history' we have a anglo/British/Judaic hereditary aristocracy closely connected through family. It doesn't take much research to figure out most of the presidents of US Inc. are related.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(2.)

/u/socks

To accomplish such a task, agents of this plan would have to “get rid of the constitutional shackles,” to prepare the vulgar mind for aristocratical ranks and titles. Should republican aversion prevent such a transition towards such rule, agents are not to “abandon the enterprise but lay up proposition in record, and in the legislature, drawing up bills, resolutions and reports,” and to keep in view that the limitations in the constitution are to be explained away. “Phrases and precedents may then be shuffled in and out,” to be adverted by candid or weak people and to allow the press during this period to propagate the doctrines of aristocracy and monarchy. “For this purpose,” according to the rules for changing a limited government into an unlimited hereditary one, “it will be particular useful to confound a mobish democracy with a representative republic.” In this period of transition, the agents of such a plan must “make known all the divisions, infighting, squabbles of past until the people tremble at their own shadows and convince them that a king [executive officer], who is always the enemy of the people, and a nobility, perhaps still more so, will take better care of the people than the people will take care of themselves.” That the grand nostrum will be public debt, indefinitely, and ever increasing, to “stretch it and swell it the utmost the items will bear” […] “…to make as perpetual as possible and to modify, complicate, divide, subdivide, subtract, postpone, etc., and it must never be forgotten that the members of the legislative body are to have deep stakes in the game. Properly composed, due members thereof can legislate and speculate, and speculate and legislate, and buy and sell, and sell and buy” until the property falls into their hands. “The favorite few” […] “...their money will give them consequence and influence,” […] “…they will be the readiest materials for hereditary aristocratic order” and through them control will be maintained. The agents of this transformation will impose a “heavy taxes” which “will produce discontents,” so a “standing army will be created in proportion of this dissatisfaction.” Malcontents and dissidents against these agents of change must be suppressed and/or imprisoned.

What Freneau was able to delay well before 19th century reconstruction for a short time – that of mob democracy and hereditary monarchy, strangely beloved in today’s western world – and not withstanding the fact that Washington’s republic, dually for the courts, was merely another magisterial monstrosity that Samuel Adams ("Founder"), lover of Liberty, thought decent to shove through the "Riot Act,” (yesteryear’s Patriot Act) empowering Sheriff's to kill rioters in groups of 12 or more, proclaiming, that "[i]n monarchy the crime of treason may admit of being pardoned or lightly punished, but the man who dares rebel against the laws of a republic ought to suffer death” ; is the Hegelian divergence of competitive enterprise over the people. While many of the colonists fought in the revolution against the British, seeking sovereignty and allodial title for the decency to be left alone from all intrusions, taxes and foreign encroachments; the revolutionary continentalists, including autocrat George Washington, never had this in mind, exclaiming that “[m]ankind when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government.” – George Washington to Henry lee, Oct 31st 1786. In other words, the autonomous man is unfit to govern himself. And while the republic was incorporated by a body of mostly rich, slave-owning continentalists – neither mechanic or farmer, nor the working common folk had any say – for the property and protection of their assets and the few wealthy and powerful enough – mostly lawyers, land speculators and bankers – to consolidate; Washington appointed an abundance of monarchist sympathizers, like the Hebrew Alexander Hamilton (Levine), who established the executive branch, believing the carrying out of a permanent public debt to be the peoples’ blessing.

Concerning the transition of a limited government to a monarchist one, Frenaeu, who Washington wanted dead, explains that if the burden of permanent public debt cannot be preserved without uprising, a standing army must be imposed to quell such dissatisfaction. For a ‘better tomorrow’ by force was the diktat. Such a debt would require “the establishment of a great incorporated bank.” “If the constitution […] should not authorize it, [and it does not], “so much the better.” The schemers thus employ deceit to enact, exclaiming “push it through by a forced meaning and you get in the bargain an admirable precedent for future misconstructions.” In so erecting the bank, Frenaeu reminds us that the schemers were to always “remember that it is to be made particularly instrumental in enriching and aggrandizing the elect few...” Furthermore, rule number 10 of this strategy is especially interesting and peculiarly evocative of the left-right political psychodrama which is played out today. “Divide and govern is a maxim consecrated by the experience of ages, and should be familiar of its use by every politician as the knife he carries in his pocket.” When such progress in this transformation is dually made and accomplished, when the public mind is but a emulator of our cloak-and-dagger agenda and “the rules already laid down,” it will be necessary and “proper to venture […] toward a removal of the constitutional landmarks.” […] “It may be called,” observing present day rhetoric, “a power for the common safety or the public good, or, ‘the general welfare.” “It will not be so easily perceived that the premium bestowed may not be equal to the circuitous tax on consumption which pays it.” Rule 12: Proposes that the ‘external danger’ would be a politically expedient scheme to augment the need for a large standing military force. Rule 13: “[This] same prudence will improve the opportunity afforded by an increase of military expenditures for perpetuating the tax required for them.” The schemers confide that if this admitted inconsistency “and establishing of a perpetual tax for a temporary service produce any difficulty in their undertaking, rule 10,” that of divide and conquer, “must be resorted to.” Rule 14: “Throughout this great undertaking it will be wise to have some particular model constantly in view.” As a covert project, the schemers devised methods to stamp down suspicions and alarms, that they knew “were to be expected.” It is vital that “the people […] be kept asleep so as not to discover, or be thrown into artificial divisions so as not to resist, what is silently going forward.” Accordingly, the best general rule is “taking from the example of crying “stop thief.’” The modus operandi is thus this. “To charge every man who whispers, or even thinks that the revolution on foot is mediated,” neither pens nor lungs spared, “with being himself an enemy of the established government, and meaning to overturn it. Let the charge be reiterated and reverberated, until at last such confusion and uncertainty be produced, that the people being not able to find out where the truth lies, withdraw their attention from the contest.” Is it any different today? “Long live the queen,” exclaims Joe Biden. This is what Freneau was to delay but unfortunately the people ignorantly clamored towards the rule of the few.
The proponents of limited government and a free and autonomous man, though Jefferson spoke only with his lips, Freneau, a French illuminate, was able to inform public perception and postpone what would be enacted 150 years ago with the assassination of Lincoln and the bankers reconstruction policy.

A group of persons said it owned everything and the mob did what it said, and not the other way around… that led to the industrial revolution and those industrialists who worked the people to the bone for their own private gains. The 4th industrial revolution is now upon us, will you go along with it or turn your back towards it? Because what they have in store for us, if you so chose to play, is human capital of bestial gamification – capital under a new, more Orwellian and intrusive system..

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(1.)

/u/socks

Elections are rigged or unrigged from the very beginning, depending on the way you look at it.

Dirty degenerate, Alan Dershowitz, who wants to mandate vaccines, sees a lesson for Americans [meaning non-Jews] when he pompously critiqued Thomas Jefferson;

“Citing a tale from the Talmud in which the rabbis tell God, ‘You gave us a document to interpret, and a methodology for interpreting it. Now leave us to do our job, …”’ "It is now our responsibility [meaning Dershowitz’s Judaic tribe] to build on your legacy," he tells Jefferson, and we must decide the matter anew for ourselves, recognizing that "freedom comes with a price, sometimes even a heavy price."

This frightening insight into the lawyer/rabbinic traditional mentality on Biblical and civil law of which Thomas Jefferson unsurprisingly regarded as a system of wretched depravity, is placed on a pedestal by the likes of Dershowitz and others of his tribe, who see a post-9/11 aristocratic ruling class of Pharisees dictating the laws of the land as a preemptive blessing.

Evidently, the red ‘democracy’ Dershowitz desires – excluding the fact that the US was never a democracy but a limited liability republic (i.e., a charter corporation situated in the District of Columbia incorporated as US Inc., which was charted by Association Inc. in the 18th century) – is one by mob rule, even if the model given to the mob by modern academia, television, print, private company statue laws, degenerates like Dershowitz, etc., regurgitated by the mob, might be perceptibly deceitful, false and/or immoral.1 What Dershowitz is advocating for is very much corporate communism – not the lowly power of worker’s communism – under the authoritarian rule of a majority consensus that his half-wits can control, so he hopes, through propaganda.

As a leech pay-to-play pedophile attorney working for the BAR corporation and Mossad, Dershowitz is no different than the politicians spouting buffoonery while taking kickbacks from private multi-national corporations. Hence, the case for democracy but particularly freedom of speech in a republic, which Dershowitz and his comrades want destroyed – if not a pay-to-play private company operation – acts as you would expect it to act: when the people get tired of you, you’re guilty with penalty of post. “We’ll find yer soul when we hit the bone.”

Therefore, while the republic is for the company courts, none of these public officials represent you as human beings and all of these structures in the political and modern legal sphere exist as fictional corporations, which were never erected – not in 2001, not in 1964, not in 1920, not in 1864, not in 1776 – to serve you but to castrate you, if you so choose to contract. Ultimately, it has never been anything other than an economic “how much can I get out of you” model. In the old days, the bourgeois would rather have you work as slaves or indentured servants without pay, which ended in the 1900’s.

Has the mob forgotten the old timers? Refusing to work for US Inc., or subsidiary state corporations, they built their cabins by hand and with help from other autonomous men growing their own food and sustaining their own families. Leave these politicians to bicker among themselves and see what gets done without the lowly worker. It would not take long for the house of cards to come crashing down. Oftentimes, when this occurs, the first class to be marginalized, subjugated and frequently eliminated are the lowly workers – the poor and disenfranchised as well as those who work for their money, comprising the large majority of the ever-decreasing middle class, as opposed to those whose money works for them in interest and dividends. No amount of military force, judicial decrees, or corporations will ever equal the power of "screw you, I quit,” especially if done in mass. Is not citizenship a worthless piece of paper that incorporates human beings in a limited agency capacity under US jurisdiction? Indeed, citizens of the US, after all, were considered by the controllers of US inc., from the period forward of its incorporation, “to be […] Actors on a most conspicuous theater […] I now bid adieu to your excellency as the chief magistrate of your state [Maine]...” – George Washington, June 8th 1783; Circular Address to the States.

“As a result of establishing Banks of Issue and the gold basis swindle in the United States, the interest and dividends upon manufactured debts is absorbing the net proceeds of labor and thus prevents the people from ever ridding themselves of the bondage of debts. A money system which caused the rich to grow richer and the poor to grow poorer can be advocated only by an enemy of the human family.”

“The effect of the present dishonest and fraudulent money system is to impoverish and destroy that great and honest middle class of moderate means that stand between those in want and revolution. To make the rich richer and the poor poorer is the greatest crime that can be perpetrated against a people ; it not only takes from the poor the dire necessities of their lives, but destroys their moral well being and brings about a degradation that drives from their souls the image of their Creator. I ask the people of the United States how much longer will they allow themselves to be fooled and impoverished by this money power making them believe that dollars are debts, redeemable and convertible into each other.”2

[…]

“When the money power is herein spoken of, it means the European monied interests as led by the Bank of England, the Rothschilds and their American agents, August Belmont & Co., J. P. Morgan & Co., et al., and their Hebrew [Jewish] Associates in the United States, the Clearing House Association of New York, established in 1853, and the American Bankers' Association, an organization of practically every bank of any size in the United States.”3

Phillip Freneau, author of ‘Rules of Changing a Republic into a Democracy, then into a Monarch,’ sourced American Museum, July 1792, ‘Rules for Changing a Limited Government into an Unlimited Hereditary…,’ forewarned the transitional methods to will a monarchy in the ruins of a limited government.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Question.... do you have stock in these vax companies? I notice that a lot of degenerates promotign these vaccines always are shareholders.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You mean a bunch of Zionist Jews created these vaccines for a promised vaccine revolution for a corona virus pandemic they drilled for 6 months before?

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What crazy things did you believe?

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like Zionists?

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Proof?

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ahhhhhh, it is. Every country is a corporation.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Plant seeds both ways.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dumb. We are all born in sin. The anti-Christ will be a man.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/magnora7 The world isn't going insane, it is just that insane people control the corporations and how they run. I went outside and farmed, did not see one insane thing. If you want to know the true naturalist technocratic agenda being slowly implemented, PLEASE READ THESE BLOGS AND TWITTER USERS;

www.wrenchinthegears.com (Alice McDowell's Blog)

https://twitter.com/Philly852 (Alice McDowell's Twitter)

https://thewrongkindofgreen.org

https://www.theartofannihillation.com (Corey morningstar's Blog)

https://twitter.com/elleprovocateur (Corey Morningstar's Blog)

These two individuals, espeically Alice McDowell, show you EXACTLY what the well placed anti-Christ scumbags, Zionists included, are planning by showing you what they ACTUALLY talk about and write about in their white papers and think tanks.

The goal is a new technocratic order based on social credit, which will be implemented slowly over a 50 year period using sustainability and covid, among other viruses as the defining motive. It isn't really about sustainability but about the financialisation of nature, the digitization of all aspects of life in a metaverse --Crypto and Blockchain are part of this transformation as well! Considering capitalism was failing due to the unsustainability of a propped up retail economy, a crisis had to occur and a new social contract had to be imposed, so they claim.

Think human capital markets, data-pharming, impact/value markets based on the WEF's stakeholder model.

Jeffrey Epstein believed he could make a deal with prosecutors by revealing the secrets of Donald Trump or Bill Clinton, a new book says by FuckYourMom in whatever

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He was suicided so he couldn't talk.

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan Talk Comedy by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]American_ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1) wtf do you mean by "cancelling him", still havnt answered that

2) sorry I forgot an E, sorry your little attitude had to point that out

3) cancel culture is for tranny faggots. Only weak willed individuals have to "cancel" some one when their view points go against what you believe in, i.e Twitter/reddit janny.

Can you rub your last 2 braincells together and give me a straight answer on how you cancelled him?

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan Talk Comedy by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

a)it is YOU'RE

b)you are just being dumb on purpose now. nothing unclear about what i said

c)im not 12, so i dont know what 'twitter janny style' even is or means

d)before you try, ive made it clear many times-i dont capitalize or punctuate with dumb dumb shit

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan Talk Comedy by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]American_ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So your saying that you cancelled yourself watching his show? Or you publicly tried to cancel him, Twitter janny style

Operation London Bridge by Brewdabier in whatever

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One day we will all get to watch this go down from our screens.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

God's means of shaping humans is evolution. Evolution implies that God wants people to be optimized for their environment, and therefore people should vary. The Old Testament rejects the idea of Heaven and Hell (Ecclesiastes 3:18-22).

The creation of mankind is first mentioned in Genesis 1:27 which I would translate from Hebrew differently. I would translate it as "So God created mankind in His own image; He created it in the image of God; He created them male and female.". Of course the image of God is kind of meaningless since it is never described. So the idea here is just that God and mankind have something in common, not that all original people were clones.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure but then we can compare ideas and debate them to figure out what makes the most sense. Feel free to post your intentional ethnicity idea to /s/nonmorons.

Senate reviews 'irregularities in the 2020 election' by humancorpse in whatever

[–]humancorpse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

who care if satan re view a corrupted election.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]BlueFrost[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Could I ask you, do you believe that God meant for everyone to have the same kind of skin, hair, eyes, or facial bone structures? Will people in Heaven have different aesthetic appearances? Or did God's image originally want everyone to be one color?

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]BlueFrost[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can I muse about starting my own intentional ethnicity?

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks, you are the first person to like it. I discuss it after the Old Testament readings, but there will be no reading this Saturday.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]BlueFrost[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Intentional ethnicity? What a neat concept.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually we have scripture itself which can be interpreted well using a knowledge of science and history. Most theology outside of scripture is garbage which can be ignored. You can see how I interpret the Old Testament in my weekly online Old Testament readings.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]BlueFrost[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is that paradox. If Satanism and Luciferianism is all about individualism and "going your own way", then why do (many) they endorse or support systems that would control other's thinking and make mankind slaves, when that is pretty much the ultimate definition of collectivism?

And I'm not promoting Satanism or saying that I am part of that here.

A Gadzillion by hennaojichan in whatever

[–]AmericanMuskrat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm getting an invalid certificate warning from the site, my phone doesn't want to load it.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]BlueFrost[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am referencing to both the Old and New Testaments on here.

And whatever Jesus or the teachers before him in the OT may have originally meant in their words, all throughout history arguments from the Bible have been used or interpreted in different ways to help support ideological arguments on both "sides". We are only operating off the (mis)information about some things that have been established to more than a millennia ago or so.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I follow the Old Testament, and most of what you wrote doesn't match what is written there. There is no rule against "criticizing or objecting God", in fact Moses argues with God. The "things you can or cannot say" is only that you cannot promote other gods since Israel at that time was a theocracy, so this was effectively treason. This is similar to not being allowed to call for assassination of the president in America. There is no "thought crime" in the Old Testament. There is no requirement to believe anything, and there is no concept of Hell in the Old Testament. Unlike "human dictators" who use coercion to enforce their rules, the god of the Old Testament is just giving rules of advice and warning that failure to follow this advice will result in societal collapse.

Religious people and the One-World government by BlueFrost in whatever

[–]platonic1 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But God is God. Philosophically He has an authority no human has, because He is the Creator. Humans are bound by His laws.

I don’t think answering this philosophically does justice. Perhaps you know that Satanists and Luciferians teach that we are our owns gods and can do whatever we want. Fair enough. But then they want to control our thinking and make us slaves, so it’s no longer about freedom to do what we want to do, but what they want us to do. We are losing the freedom to say and do things they don’t want us to do, like criticizing the Most Holy Vaccine and not getting it. Their godless utopia is no better than the heaven they hate.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]platonic1 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ever wonder about the Mandela effect, and how it targets religion? Did you know scientists say we’re in Orion, or that Mars is smaller than earth? We’re entering the reign of the antichrist IMO, and he’ll point to religion and say we misunderstood it. That’s why Adam’s hand is higher than God’s in the Creation of Adam by Michelangelo. We’re in the great deception and things are going nuts so the antichrist can swoop in and “save” us.

Natural versus vaccine immunity by humancorpse in whatever

[–]Caliban 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lost me in the beginning when he claimed the vaccine provided immunity.. it does not, in fact they have literally changed the definition of the word and removed the bit about providing immunity so they could call whatever this is they are pushing a vaccine.

Most Powerful Metal Shredder Destroys Everything For Recycling by humancorpse in whatever

[–]humancorpse[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it makes me feel like i am watching a mystery movie.. omg, like, what is gonna happen next? it should be boring and hold my attention for no more than two seconds.

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But then so do the human users, including me.

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]Zapped[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've heard that there are bots that can carry conversations with users, but it seems they always trip up along the way or eventually say something strange or off-topic.

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a good question. I can't give you any examples. I hope some other users can answer.

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]Zapped[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know of the Americans bot and it's alts, but it only creates posts and comments without context. Do any of the bots interact with real users here, that you know of?

Most Powerful Metal Shredder Destroys Everything For Recycling by humancorpse in whatever

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i just watched a 17 min video of shit being shredded.

and i am alright with that

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]socks 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I explained that the market keeps Big Pharma's vaccines in check. If there are problems, the vaccine is pulled, as has happend in some countries for AstraZeneca. The immunity clause merely helps them avoid frivolous lawsuits.

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]filbs111 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hello, fellow saiditors. Shill accounts are great!

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

maybe people should wait till then to get the vaccine

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]soundsituation 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. I haven't noticed the scheduling thing, but there seems to be an uptick in new accounts that attempt to sow infighting or only post the bleakest black pill demoralization. There are also a few accounts whose posting mostly consists of slurs and other no-no words; they could be edgy kids but I think they're probably astroturfers.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]socks 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

it's a no, until next year or the year after, while research is in process.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

is that a no

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Immunity from prosecution is not the main problem. It was merely to allow for a quick turn-around of the vaccines and tests, without the worry of litigation, particularly in the US, where anyone could have challeged the process, shutting it down, only for political reasons. Oxford U. did not have to worry about this. Big Pharma is however not immune from serious challenges, if especially there are any serious side effects. For example, Oxford's AstraZenica was pulled form some of the markets. Propaganda websites focus on this immunity issue, but it's not what anyone worries about in the present case. If there are serious side effects, the value of the research, development and manufacturing investments will drop exponentially. But that's not happened in the US. There is a much bigger legal explanation about the importance of the initial immunity from prosecution clause, but it would take too long to write here. It's essentially a nothing burger. There are controls in place - in the market - to stop a vaccine distribution if there are serious side effects.

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]FuckYourMom 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

No, I haven’t noticed. How can bots function on this platform? The requirements to log in and post are human proof.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that makes a bit more sense to me, they're saying life is super rare and maybe earth is the only planet in the universe to have it, or it is super rare in the universe where we'd likely never see any life and especially not then intelligent life which must be even more rare. That is different than saying intelligent life is just likely to wipe itself out.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

do you think it would be ok to take away their immunity, since the vaccine is so safe?

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that makes sense i guess but at least right now the vaccine ain't killing 30-60%, maybe it will catch up to them later?

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are fools, and they've been screwing up since Day One.

There will be a subtle comeuppance, when their plans come to fruition only for their successes to be used as fodder against them. I don't trust Big Pharma to wipe its own ass, let alone work on some international project that is supposed to be democratic!

Natural versus vaccine immunity by humancorpse in whatever

[–]IHaveNoId1a 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Vaccines are ... eww

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

should be some many trillions of intelligent life forms out in space

Information Theory is a branch of mathematics. Those guys would disagree - their calcs seem to indicate super rarity. There's a fair chance that we're all there is. https://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/2014/09/information-theory-chance-and-natural.html

My 87-year old father got the Moderna vaccine and wound up in the hospital by coffee_addict in whatever

[–]coffee_addict[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Amen!

My 87-year old father got the Moderna vaccine and wound up in the hospital by coffee_addict in whatever

[–]coffee_addict[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply! This is my alternative account and I've mostly been using my primary account lately. I am so sorry to hear about the loss of your father. :(

I have no faith in government altruism any more. It seems to me that virtually everything the government does to try to "help" people makes things worse. They have a sinister agenda and use deception and fear to push that agenda.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]socks 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's not just their vaccine, as the resarch for vaccines developed world-wide. Collaboration between virologists and other medical scientists helped develop the vaccines. We can trust that this collaboration, the science behind is, and the relative successes of 6.6 billion doses already administered and previously tested quite thoroughly. My note that Big Pharma cannot be fully trusted refers to other problems with Big Pharma that are unrelated to the vaccine, which is an international project. I did not say that they cannot be trusted on all matters. It would also be really foolish of them to screw up the arrangments for the vaccine.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He also thinks the vaccines killing all morons is a good plan, so, wisen up, why don't ya

A Very Compelling Compilation of Video Clips of Franc Zalewski, Carrie Madej, Pierre Gilbert, Vexille, Prince, Amaranthe, Viachelslav Krasheninnikov, Erica Mukisa, and Klaus Schwab Proving Covid is a Guise for NWO by coffee_addict in whatever

[–]coffee_addict[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

TLDR + Time Stamps:

Franc Zalewski -- 0,00 14:35 - He is a scientist who found parasite eggs in the vials he tested. He watched the eggs, and parasites grew out of them within 4 days. The parasites are carbon and aluminum based and colorful. Also tested the testing swabs and see they are spiked in order to collect DNA. Why are they collecting our DNA?

Carrie Madej -- 14:36 - 27:47 — She tested a doctor who tested a vial and actually watched a parasite grow in a few hours as she watched under the microscope. It was also multi-colored.

Dr. Pierre Gilbert — 27:48 - 28:53 — a clip from 1995 where says "In the biological destruction there are the organized tempers on the magnetic fields. What will follow is the contamination of the bloodstreams of mankind creating intentional infections. This will be enforced with laws that will make vaccination mandatory. And these vaccines will make possible to control people. The vaccines will have liquid crystals that will become hosted in the brain cells, which will become micro receivers of electromagnetic fields, where waves of very very low frequencies will be sent. And through these low frequency waves people will be unable to think, you’ll be turned into a zombie. Don’t think of this as an hypothesis… this has been done. Think of Rwanda."

Vexille — 28:54 - 30:46 — Predictive programming — an animated show from 2007 that exactly describes what is going on now with the government faking a pandemic, implemented an isolation policy, and mandating vaccinations that turned out to be a cyber-virus that altered the molecular structure of the body’s cells and converts them into biometa, essentially turning us into machines from the inside out, with no way to stop it. The vaccine was administered early in it’s experimental phase. When it did work, the virus progressed through the body until it reached the brain and we become perfect androids under the manufacturer’s control.

Prince song New World from 1996 —30:47 - 31:16 — predictive programming — “when you want to find some isolation, but the tracker you got from vaccination keeps playing ‘you’ll never walk alone’, they’re always listening, especially on the phone, when the lines blur every boy and girl, How we gonna make it in this brave new world?, The tracker you got from vaccination,

Amaranthe song Digital World from 2014, 31:17 - 31:49 — Predictive programming — Male “I am the voice of the next generation” Female: "completely digital create synthetic auras” Male:"start a revolution now” Femal: you will never have to cry cause the future is sold, you can never die and you’ll never grow old but everything surrounding you is digital. Never break the mold, you do as you’re told, freedom is for sale if you give them control, erase return in the digital world"

Viachelslav Krasheninnikov — 31:50 - 32:37 — a clip from (1982 - 1993) where this woman recounts a conversation with Slavochka (a Russian prophet), who talked about chipped humans. They are not even human anymore, they are completely controlled through the computer. People will be chipped against their will and the chipped won’t be able to die. The police will be looking for the unchipped. Christians will have to stay away from the roads to avoid detection.

Erica Mukisa 32:38 - 39:12 -- She was a third generation sorcerer who fled. She recounts what Lucifer showed her. She talks about a certain technology given by the enemy to humanity at the expense of their souls. She talked about designing sickness that are kept in incubators and spread them via food and vaccines by organizations that seem to be for humanity, then design solutions for the sicknesses that cost a lot of money. Role models, such as celebrities and media houses, movie and music studios, humanitarian organizations, are secret satanists. The devil is beautiful, which is why it is so easy to deceive people. He uses a certain family with a certain bloodline to advance his agenda (Rockefellers). This family is the one who both makes and supplies money. They decide who gets to be rich, who gets be be celebrities, and what news is reported, and the news is not necessarily true.

Klaus Schwab (head of the World Economic Forum and from the Rockefeller family)— 39:13 - 39:40 — “At the end, what the 4th industrial revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital and our biological identities."

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i'd think, even if humans wipe themselves out, there still should be some many trillions of intelligent life forms out in space, that at least a few would end up smart enough not to kill themselves and would want to explore the universe

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course Big Pharma cannot be fully trusted. But who will regulate them?

why trust their vaccine then? Why give them immunity for it?

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think he's saying we could have a black death that would kill off the weak, that's kind of what covid does but it's not really that threatening, won't kill 30 to 60 percent of the population anyway. I don't see how he is supporting jewish overlords or whatever.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Popper 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

and USA during mcarthyism

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, most won't, and some who will are going to stop exercising their minds after waves of pollution temporarily overcomes them. The lying scum in power are inadvertently adding to this thought-pollution through the controlling of meager personalities.

Speaking of which, it was a blow when I realized I could no longer enjoy music the same way as before. I've been playing guitar and bass for years, and have more or less put these down due to the involutive effects my upbringing had on making and listening to modern music. I still haven't rectified this issue; obviously, some part of me clings to waste. And the pressure is indeed high...

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]humancorpse 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Join the Chinese Communist Party!

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–]Horrux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. Most won't, and that costs mankind dearly. Especially now that time is short and the pressure is high...

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Yup. There are several paid posters working this site. They advance opinions they do not hold and attempt to derail conversations. At Ruqqus a mole got into their chat server and exposed the whole operation. It's a social media influencer company.

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Shill = an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.

Plenty of these on Saidit. I agree with mahavishnunj though, that there are simply a lot of stupid people here.

Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan Talk Comedy by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Uncancellable - anyone who's self employed.

Working class problem.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shit joke.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't give a shit. But u/Magnora7 shouldn't be played by shills, but it seems to be his weakness.

Has anyone noticed a large percentage of shill accounts lately? by Zapped in whatever

[–]mahavishnunj 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

'shill' doesnt always mean 'someone with opposing views'. there is a lot of that, but many times it really means 'just incredibly fucking stupid'. one of those might be in this thread right now.

What is happening in this world by magnora7 in whatever

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Test his words, people. They are better than anything else on this thread. Do the exercise.