expert witnesses could see in the video.

You selectively listen to some people who watched a video over others who watched the same video. Having a job title doesn't remove bias. An expert witness is less likely to sacrifice his career and safety by publicly stating they have any judgement that doesn't fall in line with the raging mob of delirious rioters ready to lynch the first person to back the idea George wasn't a saint.

we're taking about the coroner Andrew Baker, MD, and the critical care pulmonary specialist Dr. Martin Tobin.

There was no physical evidence of asphyxia or physical assault. The wording on the autopsy report was a judgement call, not concrete fact. It also alluded to multiple drug intoxication, something you are intent on ignoring.

The witness I'm talking about wasn't a fucking bystander.

Who has about as much visual data as a bystander. But the guy was clearly over stimulated and twitchy, his behaviour was not that of a sober man.

therefore you know more about it than the medical professionals and the coroner.

Failing to disregard the massive levels of drugs in his system, erratic behaviour and the fact that he had both heart disease and tested positive for COVID, I have a fucking strong suspicion that there was slightly more to his health condition than lying on the floor, yes. Is that really too difficult for you to comprehend?

Is that a correct statement of your argument?

I have had COVID, it caused shortness of breathe. I have overdosed on entactogens, it caused psychosis. I have overdoses on stimulants, it caused tachycardia and tightness of chest, reduced blood oxygenation, fluctuating blood pressure and disorientation. I have experienced serotonin syndrome which nearly killed me, twice. I have taken over 50 drugs, most of which were novel stimulants, and I recognise the side effects and behaviours of someone intoxicated and judge the man to have been intoxicated. I have had poor health while intoxicated and judge that had I had COVID when I overdosed, I would be dead. Do I think Floyd would have died without police arriving on the scene that day considering my experienced view of the circumstances? Yes. Was the autopsy vague? Yes, it didn't explicitly say Chauvin murdered him, but there were complications which led to his death. Had he been a sober, healthy man, he would not have had difficulty breathing when sat in a squad car. Your obsession with blood lust for Chauvin is blinding you to the obvious, that the man was on a path to self destruction, had previous overdose history and was showing signs that he was overdosing again, which puts him at risk of injuring himself, police officers or members of the public. As a violent criminal known to have carried offensive weapons previously, most people would agree that restraint is the most appropriate route to subdue a person who is a risk to the public. Let's also not forget that the position he was put in was a part of the mandatory training for these officers