Remember the next time a criminal with a violent history approaches you in a crazed state, to advise any police enforcement in the area to give the criminal a pillow and some warm milk and cookies.

In Floyd's case that wouldn't have worked because the Chauvin wouldn't give himself milk and cookies, since if he had them to give, he would already have them.

It's an insult to all those who have been injured or killed by people like Floyd.

Chauvin had injured at least 18 that ended up on his report. And he'd killed 2.

Of the two of them, he was by far the worse.

So basically, any time something is written on paper, you believe every word and do not challenge it or question it?

Not at all. I can tell most of what you're writing is bullshit.

At least when debating with others, they provide some substance and approach to their position

In this thread I've shown what you're saying is bullshit by linking to a newspaper article about police procedures, and quoting the press release from the coroners office about George Floyd's homicide, and the corner's report itself.

You've just said wrong stuff that for all the evidence you've supplied, are products of your own fevered imagination.

So it's an impressive display of lack of reflexivity to get on sime high horse about quality of debate.

You've offered nothing.