BlackRock Backs Off ESG. Could this be the turning of the tide for woke?

submitted by HiddenFox from thedailyupside.cmail20.com

all 19 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Tarrock 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No.

[–]transbob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sometimes people say no when they really meant to say yes but if they would have taken more time to think about it they might have said something else.

https://youtube.com/shorts/86KiDRFRuH8?si=tYuhVE3ddVAgyezk

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anheuser Busch, Target, Disney (and most of Hollywood) are losing money. At least some elites must be pissed that the weirdo troon elites are costing them money.

[–]Dragonerne 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are NOT backing off ESG. They are rebranding. Watch Larry Fink, the jews, interviews, he says as much himself.

DUE to the backlash against ESG, they are rebranding it to conscious capitalism or something like that

[–]makesyoudownvote 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Been following this for the past few weeks. I think you are seeing the beginning of the pendulum swinging back.

The left overplayed their hand and rationality is finally going to face consequences.

Trump is almost certainly winning the 2024 election at this point, unless the Democrats have a surprise candidate up their sleeve. He will beat Biden easily, and he's winning the Republican primary almost for certain.

DEI is also dying btw. More and more industries are cutting their DEI offices.

Big concern though is that we need to be careful not to commit the same mistake. Don't overplay our hands too.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]makesyoudownvote 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Yes and no. I mean the role of conservatives isn't really to stop progress, but rather to temper it and ensure it takes place slowly and rationally. In that sense the world is pretty much always getting more progressive and that can actually be a good thing.

    That said, what the left has begun pushing around 2011 and accelerated in 2016 and then went crazy with in 2020 is not really progressive, it's regressive, which is funny because that's what they called the right (project much). They have gone full blown authoritarian and want a great reset in order to instill anti-liberal socialist and Marxist policies. They won't admit that's what they are yet because that would be suicide but to anyone who looks seriously that's exactly what they are pushing.

    But they went too far with pushing them. If the right can manage to look sane for just like 2 years the pendulum really will swing back into sanity. The problem is the right is instead deciding to play the same game the left has been playing. If you watched the recent republican debate it felt like we were watching WWE not a presidential debate. This and all the anti-semetic or genuinely racist/homophobic/transphobic stuff is the only way the right can throw this now.

    The left forgot the people you really need to appeal to are the moderates. They thought they could take a page out of the Apple computer playbook and instead just dictate the market, but in politics that will never keep you a majority share without force and they couldn't quite go full Mao or Stalin on everyone without them noticing.

    [–]screwballeclipsed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    ah yes, the illusion of the two party system that Jefferson or Adams spoke of. or was it both?

    [–]makesyoudownvote 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Unfortunately without massive voter reform, of which we have been sold reforms in the opposite direction, the two party system stopped being an illusion almost two centuries ago.

    At this point no third party can survive in the presidential election for longer than two cycles without displacing another. There can be only two until we.

    1. Switch past a first past the post voting system.

    2. Remove or severely limit funding capabilities from parties as they currently exist.

    3. Stop encouraging people to vote who don't feel self motivated to do so. Everyone should be able to vote, but when you encourage people to vote that wouldn't of their own volition, you get votes that will only be along their party lines. They are not self motivated to vote, so they will similarly lack motivation to do due diligence and research. They are easily manipulated into voting, so they are similarly easily manipulated in how they vote.

    I'm actually quite moderate and slightly left leaning. I am fairly liberal though, which is an entirely different access. I have never registered Republicans nor Democrat. But I don't delude myself into thinking anyone else has a shot at the presidency excepting extreme circumstances. If Trump ran third party for example, he would possibly have a chance. Especially if he could spin a narrative that he had to run third party in order to not have to play by party rules or something like that.

    [–]screwballeclipsed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    until politicians can stop being controlled by bribes, lobbies and the such, voting will not matter much. what would happen is only those who contribute to the system can vote on how the system works? education of the people needs to improve. there's too many people who are unable to think past what the TV tells them. that's just a couple of changes that would likely help the country.

    [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    They are downplaying because they need whites to go die in their zog wars.

    [–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Wait, what's the next war coming?

    [–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    It won't get better until trannies aren't in positions of power and trans shit gets reclassified as mental illness

    [–]xoenix 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    That's the problem, nobody likes to play censorious, tattletale bureaucrat more then them.

    [–]Fiyanggu 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Libtards need to back off.

    [–]RedItBurn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I'll believe it when I see it.

    Any backing off of wokeness, political correctness, etc is usually just temporary as they attempt to rebrand, obscure, shift, and relaunch under a new identity.

    [–]HiddenFox[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Scroll down past the first paragraph.

    [–]EternalSunset 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They have "backed off ESG" many times in the past, but all empty demagoguery and rebranding.

    [–]saniyasharma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I'm delighted to track down such a ton of supportive information here in the post. especially so ecstatic atrial and call young woman so a fair post and a very looking young woman post and kissing affiliations. thankful to you for sharing the post. Chachi Ki Chudai || Baap Beti Ki Chudai || Maa Ki Chudai || Mami Ki Chudai || Nokrani Ki Chudai

    [–]passionflounderPaper tiger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    the financial juggernaut also acknowledged that some initiatives were “unlikely to help promote long-term shareholder value.”

    The initiatives have absolutely nothing to do with any long term value. The economic damage is a feature.