SaidIt | creating Social media website - SaidIt.net | Patreon

submitted by pandorasbox from patreon.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Evola 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

Where's the lies?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Are you kidding me man. The top post on the homepage is a speculative lie that some deepstate used health policy against the prior president. There are so many ways to check whether or not that's true, but people aren't here to do that, they're here to partake and enjoy a speculative lie which they experience as a fictional internet narrative. It doesn't need have any grounding in truth, which is why people are so averse to checking any fact about it, they simple enjoy it as an fun internet narrative rather than true thing about the world.

The second post on the homepage right now is in support of an antimedicine lie which works to convince saidit users not to trust qualified licensed medical professionals. That's such an insidious and personal attack against saiditors. Have you been in an emergency room with a sick or injured child? Such a personal and sacred thing, and saidit posters want to infect that moment with distrust and anti-scientific conspiracy thinking.

The third post on the homepage is about a link which is down and the fourth post is this. Neither are lies.

Here's a lie chipit told because he wanted to defend the literal 1940s German Nazi camps.

https://saidit.net/s/history/comments/a9e3/think_the_nazis_invented_the_concentration_camp/10v6c

Here's a series of lies which are based on russian propaganda and designed to excuse their ongoing genocide and mass torture, rape and deportations.

https://saidit.net/s/Antiwar/comments/a965/make_no_mistake_war_hawk_american_policy_helped/10urv?context=3

Here's another lie designed to make saiditors distrust their qualified licensed medical professionals.

https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/a96f/who_proposals_could_strip_nations_of_their/10uq3?context=3

Here's a lie about American domestic politics which serves to further radicalise the terrorists

https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/a8qr/reminder_democrat_pacs_have_a_history_of_staging/10tqw?context=3

Here's a lie which takes the results of a scientific study and pretends the researchers found the opposite. The result serves to further radicalise the terrorists and apologise for the ongoing ruzzian genocide and mass rape, torture and deportations

https://saidit.net/s/MediaAnalysis/comments/a8ou/media_admits_lying_about_russiagate/10thr?context=3

Every single one of those links is a lie told WITHIN THE PAST WEEK

[–]Evola 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Well take it to those threads then. Also the holocaust never happened.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Okay but a minute ago you were confused why I felt that way and wondered where the lies were.

Do you now agree with me that saidit has a problem with false information?

[–]Vulptex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Who gets to decide what's "false information"?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You've replied to me three times dipshit. I'm not writing three messages to you. I don't know why you allowed yourself to write three separate messages to me, but I'm not writing three back at you.

Who gets to decide what's "false information

Click on the links right there dipshit, in the comment chain of this ^ reply. It's a fucking factual statement of fact that a conservative group is not a "democrat PAC". Don't give me that "well who determines" bullshit. If someone points at a conservative money raising group and says "that's a democrat PAC" then they're lying.

Likewise if you and I both listen to the same audio recording on YouTube in which a man says that he met a nurse called Olga who is full of shit and believes XYZ. Then you and I read an article, where the author says "the man in the video believes XYZ", then the author is lying. Don't give me that "who decides" shit, we can both listen to the story of the nurse - if you think nobody gets to decide whether the man, or the nurse, believe XYZ then you're criminally fucking insane.

This is gaslighting level insane

This is pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining level of insane. There's something wrong with you, if you think: "there's no way to decide the truth. Am I pissing on his leg? Is it just localised rain coming from tiny clouds round my dick?" No, you complete dipshit, you can stick your "who decides" up your dipshit ass

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I didn't even read those links. Because I've kind of stopped caring, the government is hopelessly corrupt and everyone believes ridiculous things. And I myself have seen plenty of laughable posts on saidit. But I know how dangerous and wrong it is to give someone the authority to decide what's true or not. First of all, it often backfires because of the Streisand effect. And second, anyone with that much power can do literally whatever they want, and wipe all the records clean and rewrite history. The USSR went so far as to edit useful idiots out of photographs once they were no longer useful. Those people weren't just executed or sent to the gulag, they never existed, and anyone who said otherwise was "spreading misinformation" and was an enemy of the state. You can't just trust people with power, because as bitter a truth as it is, humans are inherently evil and selfish and greedy. Even if they were good, the evil ones still always end up at the top because they're the ones who want power the most.

No one is forcing you to use saidit, so you have no right to destroy it. That you want to shows that you're intolerant.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

But I know how dangerous and wrong it is to give someone the authority to decide what's true or not

Piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.

Are you a fucking moron. One plus one equals two. It's not dangerous or wrong for someone to have to authoritatively tell you that one plus one equals two

  • you could check it yourself with a calculator

  • you could ask other people what one plus one comes to

  • you could learn more about the topic until you understand why one plus one equals two

It's not dangerous or wrong for someone to authoritatively tell you that one plus one equals two. What a moronic thing to say.

I have just told you that one plus one equals two and given links to why and you replied

I dont know what one plus one equals. Because I've kind of stopped caring, the government is hopelessly corrupt and everyone believes ridiculous things. And I myself have seen plenty of laughable posts

That's moronic.

you have no right to destroy it

Drama queen. What are you captain america stopping thanos. What kind of destruction do you imagine I'm doing in that tiny distrustful head of yours

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's not dangerous or wrong for someone to authoritatively tell you that one plus one equals two.

Showing me why I'm wrong is exactly what they should do. What is wrong is for them to silence or even punish me for daring to defy them. Which is what they do, they just insult you, ban you, and not even tell you why you're wrong. It just convinces you even more of your conspiracy theory, but they don't care because they think you're a worthless irredeemable person, and they tell you, "you should kill yourself now, and give somebody else a piece of that oxygen!".

And these political controversies are much more subjective than 1+1, so that's a faulty comparison. Plus, banning "wrong math" would result in "Jeffy's Homework" getting banned. Even with something that simple we already have a censorship problem.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Showing me why I'm wrong is exactly what they should do

Which is exactly what I did, but you wouldn't know, because you didn't open the link. You just assumed you knew, because you have a comfortable narrative running in your head and checking evidence is usually detrimental to that

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

jews with money for the most part.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Half of the people that anti-semites claim are Jewish turn out not to be. And Donald Trump is more Zionist than most Jews in his country.

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

So?

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So Jews aren't the boogeymen you think they are.

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Really? How many times do we have to go over this...

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I didn't say that they where. What they do have is massively disproportionate representation in key government, banking and entertainment sectors and a track record of degenerative practices that are terrible for everyone else.

I lose nothing by pretending that they are the boogie men and from a marketing perspective it's easier to sell to the public than the true more elaborate explanation.

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No it has a problem with people like you not providing actual arguments and evidence to disprove the claims shown.

If there is false information don't you have a responsibility to disprove it without having to use rhetorical fallacies?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh you mean, like, in any of these five links I already shared in the last week alone? You mean doing something like what you would see if you opened any of those five links I gave from the last week. Yeah I tried that. What do you think people say when you use evidence and facts to disprove their false information. Go ahead and click any of the five links I shared which are all from just this week

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They probably just call you a faggot.