People Dropping

submitted by StillLessons from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn🐈‍⬛ 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (17 children)

The number of side-effects DOUBLES after each injection.
That was observed by Jessica Rose, and happens more often with toxic substances.

On can develop an allergy or a different dangerous immune-reaction to the injected substances. So even when the first injection is completely clean, the next injection can cause severe damage.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

On can develop an allergy or a different dangerous immune-reaction to the injected substances.

A doctor in the 191x's (IIRC) won a Nobel prize for demonstrating allergic reactions could be induced by injecting people with foreign proteins.

Childhood allergies skyrocket, and it's an mystery...

"DOCTORS BAFFLED", because the gravy train.

Edit: EVIDENCE

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1913 (Charles Richet - Nobel Lecture)

He claims to have coined the term Anaphylaxis.

Phylaxis, a word seldom used, stands in the Greek for protection. Anaphylaxis will thus stand for the opposite. Anaphylaxis, from its Greek etymological source, therefore means that state of an organism in which it is rendered hypersensitive, instead of being protected.

Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting a protein into animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein

"DOCTORS BAFFLED"

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Correct. You don't bite the hand that feeds you... when you're a fucking rat.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

You don't bite the hand that feeds you... when you're a fucking rat.

Solutions in "$cience": WERERATS

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

$cience thinks we'rerats. All of us.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm a werebear.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

A wereostrich says "where?"

[–]CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A wereostrich says "where?"

Where?

Why?

I suppose I'm technically a whybear

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Phylaxis, a word seldom used, stands in the Greek for protection.

Phenomenal word!!!
I think I will use it for a new counter-resistance philosophy and action plan.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

It doubles as a lower bound. It could be an exponential correlation. We actually don't know this so far. Or do we?

So that, lets say, after the fifth or sixth jab you are like 95% dead, statistically speaking.

[–]zyxzevn🐈‍⬛ 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Canada has bought 11 jabs for every person. To kill?

Women have 2x more side-effects, and there is a huge difference between people and between batches.
But there is one man who took many injections. We need to know his health status and why he seems immune to the side-effects.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

This effect in women is quite classical after the roll-out of some big thing in pharma-tech.

For their medical studies, they "like" using men more because they don't have to factor in the rather complex effects of the feminine hormone system. This basically is the same thing for every drug that isn't "female only", so to say.

On the other hand, because with mRNA jabs, they basically are exploring uncharted territory in cell-engineering, it isn't astounding that epigenetics has this sort of influence on the actual effect regarding the individual patient.

If they can't guarantee the quality of the jabs themselves, they should be sued into oblivion for damages. On your side of the big pond, this even is possible, afaik.

We only got this lame-ass von der Leyen-puppet that blocked off most of this legal opportunities behind closed doors with an army of BigPharma lawyers, sadly.

[–]iamonlyoneman 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm increasingly thinking the heads of big pharma companies will be perforated from a distance when people finally come to understand how screwed they are and they can't sue. This is going to push some people right over the edge of civilized behaviour.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Totally justified in my eyes.

Justice itself has become rather abstract in the last two decades. When it always boils down to who has how much money or who knows whom.

I can't be alone in realizing this. But usually it takes longer in the general public to realize what actually happened. When most of them spend their "free" time in a comfortable coma of their choice.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This effect in women is quite classical after the roll-out of some big thing in pharma-tech.

For their medical studies, they "like" using men more because they don't have to factor in the rather complex effects of the feminine hormone system.

No doubt, they'll soon start including "women" with male endowments for their research.

Solutions in "$cience".

[–]iamonlyoneman 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

https://jessicar.substack.com/

https://jessica5b3.substack.com/

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I just read some of her stuff.

Wow... quite an intellectual there.

She has an impressive way and style with words.

[–]zyxzevn🐈‍⬛ 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. I will correct my links.