all 11 comments

[–]StillLessons 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The vaccine makers were given blanket immunity under EUA. Nobody can get standing to sue. This sits at the foundation of the crime that is being committed.

For those thinking Trump is a savior, please note that this concept of blanket immunity is adhered to across all political lines. Those running the show are all in complete agreement on this subject. Trump as much as everyone in the "establishment" he pretends he isn't a part of. Hint: he is.

Edit to add: Two more points occur to me. First, the medical community has also drunk the Kool-aid on this. As such, when people sue, lawyers usually use their "pet doctors" to demonstrate that the person being sued did not follow standard medical practice. When they are all following the same damaging practices, the suit becomes impossible, because you need to show that "a good doctor wouldn't do that", but almost all doctors are doing it. Who do you use to show the practice is damaging if other doctors won't testify to that?

Second, perhaps the very people who are so likely to generate the lawsuits we're so used to seeing are also the most likely to be buying into the insanity we are witnessing. This one is just a hunch and may not be at all borne out in practice, but just a thought.

[–]magnora7[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

The vaccine makers were given blanket immunity under EUA. Nobody can get standing to sue

Yes but they can still sue the government for approving it and enforcing mandates, sue the employers for enforcing mandates, sue the doctors who pushed it hard without giving informed consent to their patients, sue the media who was stifling information contradictory to pharma narratives.

And plus this EUA is just a piece of paper. It doesn't grant them immunity from lawsuits if they've committed a crime against humanity.

because you need to show that "a good doctor wouldn't do that", but almost all doctors are doing it.

And the ones who didn't were fired by corrupt hospitals, some even for just speaking out against the widespread use of this highly-experimental technology.

Second, perhaps the very people who are so likely to generate the lawsuits we're so used to seeing are also the most likely to be buying into the insanity we are witnessing.

Perhaps, but lawyers are known for going against the grain quite often, so there's got to be lawyers out there itching to try out these lawsuits. Especially once it's proven it's possible to get money from this approach. I think perhaps that's the actual thing that's causing a wait, it's not yet been proven a profitable avenue for lawyers. Once it is, then I imagine the floodgates will open.

You know all those "Have you been injured by x medicine?" ads lawyers have on tv? Imagine that times a thousand.

[–]jamesK_3rd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

PREP act.

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was a couple I have heard of but I don't have links. One family sued to get Ivermectin for thier dying father and won, but the hospital refused to administer it. The guy died. Another sued to have someone transfered to another hospital that would administer ivermectin and won. But so much damage had already been done that he died several days later at the other hospital. They say that he was responding well to ivermectin, and even woke up from coma, but it was too late.

I'm sure there are many more which are simply censored under the guise of "disinformation". Any lawsuits that are settled will no doubt be hidden with NDAs.

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Reiner Füllmich is the obvious one to follow. I found this website about their grand jury. The strange thing is that I only find livestreams, no formal, legal updates published as text. I can't watch their livestreams right now. The folks at Cutting through the Fog speculate that Füllmich is controlled opposition. Those people say that about everyone, but then again, Füllmich has acted suspiciously in the past, slandering a potential Dutch partner without apparent cause (by calling them controlled opposition, which is a hallmark sign that they themselves are controlled opposition). This coverage says there are legal actions in South Africa, India, Poland, and Canada, and that Bill Gates faces the death penalty in India (which doesn't matter because he doesn't have to go there). That information is supposed to be found in a Füllmich video from 4 February or briefly before that, although the article doesn't link to it.

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nice, thanks for that information!

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm disappointed by how little I found. If you listen to the livestreams, would you mind summarizing them for us?

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The courts are part of the problem.
Canadian government put most large firms on retainer.
No one is willing to fight with legalese.
No one is willing to fight the globalist corporatocracy agenda.

[–]fluffer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

do you rememeber when trump was sitting president and he asked the supreme court to consider his situation and the supreme court said to our sitting president FUCK YOU WE WONT EVEN LOOK AT IT?

do you remember when the supreme court just fucked off our current president?

and you wonder why the courts are behaving differently than before?

hint: the country and the world have been quietly conquered.

/u/magnora7

[–]yabbit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This shitty post got 23 upvotes but my high iq posts get nothing? Fuck you giys.