you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]rubberbiscuit 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

They do not put "the man"'s race in the article, not once. Not anywhere. the only thing that gives it away, other than it being sort of obvious, is they did include a picture and its a blackie. If this had been a crazy white man, all white people would be guilty of the crime, and this even in the NY Post which is not near as bad as most "news".

[–]1000wombats 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They don't want to depict minorities as anything except perfect

[–]Brewdabier 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And had they said black they the BLM people would cry police brutality.

[–]spex 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The NYPost doesn't depict anybody as perfect from what I've read from their fine publication

[–]ShalomEveryone 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

all white people would be guilty of the crime

Nope, when a black person or a brown person commit a crime all of them are guilty. When a white person commits a crime, that person is a "lone wolf", "mentally ill" and the media goes on to protect the white criminal.

Shalom

✡️

[–]rubberbiscuit 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Your saying it doesn't make it true. This article is proof that the exact opposite is true.

[–]ShalomEveryone 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Wow, lol, one article is all the proof you need. Just as long as it confirms your bias.

Shalom

✡️

[–]rubberbiscuit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I provided 1 more article than you did. You have your head in the sand and have been paying no attention for 2 1/2 years at least. Good day to you sir.

[–]sproketboy 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just ignore the fed.

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know I love you SE but don't piss on my leg and call it manischawitz

[–]tyranicaloverlord 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They've stopped doing this for black people for well over a decade now. The evening news used to be nothing but black mugshots, I remember it well. There in the early 2000s they stopped. Somehow the system wants to cover up the staggering amount of violent crime committed by black people.

I don't understand the end game. Why carry the water for black people?

[–]Brewdabier 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

its a blackie

Lol

[–]Trajan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's the right way to do it. His race isn't relevant unless it emerges his attack was racially motivated. That the mainstream identitatian media would certainly lead with 'white man...' headlines, were this nutter white, doesn't make it right to do the same in reverse. That's what critical theory commissars want.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That is not what the critical race theory commissars want because they literally control the narrative and get exactly what they want. Which is clearly to use identitarianism as a weapon against white people exclusively. It is the correct response to point out thier hypocrisy at every turn.

[–]Trajan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd see a distinction between doing what they do and calling out their hypocrisy. They want everybody to be divided. The worst possible outcome for them would be people seeing other other as human beings, not as representatives of identity groups.