all 21 comments

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

FDA-approved use.

Yet when the Sackler family was poisoning America with opioids the FDA did nothing.

[–]shzprm 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

you shouldn't take that shit though, it makes no sense not to take the vaccine but drink that trash, if you think the vaccine is going to poison you then why poison yourself with some other chemical shit ? who do you think produce that shit? The same big pharma that produces the "vaccine".

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

it makes no sense not to take the vaccine

Only if you blindly trust authority who have perpetually oppressed, exploited, lied, manipulated, and waged war on humanity.

The ruling class are NOT your benevolent parents.

then why poison yourself with some other chemical shit?

Or - you could just use it when you actually need it IF you actually get sick. My 74 year old parents, and one person in California, are the only people I actually know who got the COVID/flu.

[–]shzprm 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Or - you could just use it when you actually need it IF you actually get sick. My 74 year old parents, and one person in California, are the only people I actually know who got the COVID/flu.

it's fucking chemicals, it's as bad as the vaccine. But hey knock yourself out. You're not even coherent, the WHO also says the vaccine is fine, you trust the WHO when it comes to Ivermectin, but you don't trust the WHO with the vaccine? You're a joke. Either the WHO are liars and they lie all the time, or they are not. But they can't be both. Wake up buddy, it's you who don't want to accept the truth.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

it's as bad as the vaccine.

ONE MILLION PERCENT WRONG.

Actual medical and scientific studies, organizations, and industries have proven how effective it is before this manufactued COVID hysteria for depopulation and profits kicked in.

I never said I trust the WHO nor ANY centralized authority.

[–]shzprm 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Seems like people here are quick to want to drink poison. Maybe if the vaccine took the form of a drink, then people discussing here would drink it /s

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I drink in poison through my eyes, digest it, then piss out venom through my words.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Either the WHO are liars and they lie all the time, or they are not. But they can't be both.

No one "lies all the time". They lie some of the time, about critical medical issues, so they are liars. Given the seriousness of their lies, some moral standards would also rate them as evil.

[–]shzprm 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No one "lies all the time". They lie some of the time, about critical medical issues, so they are liars. Given the seriousness of their lies, some moral standards would also rate them as evil.

Oh, so how do you know when the WHO is lying and isn't lying?

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't, so I don't pay any attention to them at all.

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

are WHO the only source for data on Ivermectin? No. It's been around so long time, its patent ran out. The data is solid on it. Also, it was not created in a lab but found in "nature" if we consider a Japanese golf course nature, and the drug was created from this thing found in the real world. So, I don't know what definition you're using for "chemical" but it might be to broad to be of any use.

I am not saying take the drug without reason, but if find yourself in the same situation as people are deciding to take it, what options would you choose?

[–]shzprm 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

are WHO the only source for data on Ivermectin? No.

But WHO says it is not dangerous, WHO also says that the vaccine isn't dangerous. So WHO is right on the vaccine but wrong on Ivermectin? LOL...

[–]proc0 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

then why poison yourself with some other chemical shit

Are you not seeing the title of the post? WHO says it's not poison.

who do you think produce that shit? The same big pharma that produces the "vaccine"

Incorrect. It's a molecule, I would think there are many manufacturers, unlike vax which is monopolized by 3 or 4 big pharma.

Are you being neutral about this? Or are you just hating on anyone going against the narrative?

[–]shzprm 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Are you not seeing the title of the post? WHO says it's not poison.

it's some chemical shit, it's poison to me. You're exchanging some poison for another. The WHO also says these vaccines are safe. So you believe the WHO here, but not about the vaccines? At least be coherent.

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

It's not about WHO, it's about what's actually true (obviously they won't be publishing 100% lies all the time). I just assumed you would be pro-vax and think WHO is a credible source. Drugs exist and sometimes are helpful when taken appropriately. In this case, it's about the narrative having been against IVM, even though there is so much evidence of safety. This in turn is evidence against the narrative that so many just like to believe.

[–]shzprm 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It's not about WHO

well that thread is about the WHO.

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yes, because it's proof their narrative is bogus. And yes they're corrupted shit anyway.

[–]shzprm 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

so how do you know when the WHO lies and when it doesn't?

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

When it makes sense and aligns with other sources that aren't as corrupt. Knowing when it lies doesn't matter to me, but it should matter to those that believe it as a valid institution.

[–]shzprm 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When it makes sense and aligns with other sources that aren't as corrupt. Knowing when it lies doesn't matter to me, but it should matter to those that believe it as a valid institution.

AKA "when it suits me", you can't have it both ways people.

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I dont know what you're going on about.