BOMBSHELL from the WHO’s Own Website: Even When Taken In Animal Doses, Ivermectin “NOT Hazardous To Humans!” -

submitted by ProudAmerican from proudamerican.site

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

it makes no sense not to take the vaccine

Only if you blindly trust authority who have perpetually oppressed, exploited, lied, manipulated, and waged war on humanity.

The ruling class are NOT your benevolent parents.

then why poison yourself with some other chemical shit?

Or - you could just use it when you actually need it IF you actually get sick. My 74 year old parents, and one person in California, are the only people I actually know who got the COVID/flu.

[–][deleted]  (8 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    it's as bad as the vaccine.

    ONE MILLION PERCENT WRONG.

    Actual medical and scientific studies, organizations, and industries have proven how effective it is before this manufactued COVID hysteria for depopulation and profits kicked in.

    I never said I trust the WHO nor ANY centralized authority.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      I drink in poison through my eyes, digest it, then piss out venom through my words.

      [–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      Either the WHO are liars and they lie all the time, or they are not. But they can't be both.

      No one "lies all the time". They lie some of the time, about critical medical issues, so they are liars. Given the seriousness of their lies, some moral standards would also rate them as evil.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        I don't, so I don't pay any attention to them at all.

        [–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        are WHO the only source for data on Ivermectin? No. It's been around so long time, its patent ran out. The data is solid on it. Also, it was not created in a lab but found in "nature" if we consider a Japanese golf course nature, and the drug was created from this thing found in the real world. So, I don't know what definition you're using for "chemical" but it might be to broad to be of any use.

        I am not saying take the drug without reason, but if find yourself in the same situation as people are deciding to take it, what options would you choose?