Sticky trick: new glue spray kills plant pests without chemicals by Drewski in environment

[–]Shook71 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A groundbreaking new glue spray is revolutionizing pest control by effectively killing plant pests without chemicals. This eco-friendly solution uses a sticky substance to trap and eliminate pests, safeguarding crops and gardens. The innovative approach reduces reliance on harmful pesticides, promoting healthier ecosystems and safer food production. As consumers increasingly seek sustainable products, this glue spray stands out as a natural alternative. Just as people turn to an online pharmacy for Mounjaro for health solutions, gardeners and farmers can now rely on this advanced, chemical-free method to protect their plants.

Study: Humans Will Run Out of Resources Including Oil, Coal, Natural Gas, Soil and Phosphorus by 2060 by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]PsychoTranyRedditMod 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bidenomics? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you post stupid shit like that?

Study: Humans Will Run Out of Resources Including Oil, Coal, Natural Gas, Soil and Phosphorus by 2060 by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]Rah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oil, gas and coal are semi-renewable. As long as humanity does not remove more than Earth produces, we can extract all we want. Places with oil will run out, and others will appear somewhere else. Same with gas. Remember organic matter is always decomposing and being under pressure to compact into hydrocarbons. The lie that conditions to make it are lost is spread to attribute scarcity.

Study: Humans Will Run Out of Resources Including Oil, Coal, Natural Gas, Soil and Phosphorus by 2060 by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]P-38lightning 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again?

Study: Humans Will Run Out of Resources Including Oil, Coal, Natural Gas, Soil and Phosphorus by 2060 by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We will run out of food or it will be too expensive to eat by then: https://files.catbox.moe/k5yaz9.jpg

Study: Humans Will Run Out of Resources Including Oil, Coal, Natural Gas, Soil and Phosphorus by 2060 by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]IkeConn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is that why rich people plan on killing all the poors?

Texas Asks People to Avoid Using Their Cars by Drewski in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The headline is shit. We've got an Ozone Action Day which is nothing extraordinary for this time of year. "do less that makes ozone' is boilerplate guidance, not something extraordinary https://takecareoftexas.org/about-us/blog/what-ozone-action-day

Texas Asks People to Avoid Using Their Cars by Drewski in environment

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then build better public transportation. Keep them safe, clean, and in good repair.

Texas Asks People to Avoid Using Their Cars by Drewski in environment

[–]Drewski[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Solar project to destroy thousands of Joshua trees in the Mojave Desert by Drewski in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

🤡

Solar project to destroy thousands of Joshua trees in the Mojave Desert by Drewski in environment

[–]Drewski[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How DuPont Knowingly Poisoned Americans With PFAS For Over 50 Years by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]gnexuser2424 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I live in the ohio valley area and our water has been bad for a long time and nothing is done about this... they dgaf cuz we aren't a rich area...

Russia has discovered 50 trillion dollars worth of crude oil in Antarctica. by Canbot in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, it's a measure in this case, by contrast to $50 trillion. Oil companies will pay for videos claiming that there's so much oil available under the Antarctic, it could produce $800 billion in crude annually for 500 years (which is not true). I'll agree with you that this is very important news, and would upvote it, but there are better reports that offer reliable information, for example noting that this is an 82-million-ton field, not something many times that size.

Russia has discovered 50 trillion dollars worth of crude oil in Antarctica. by Canbot in environment

[–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Money has no intrinsic value.

Russia has discovered 50 trillion dollars worth of crude oil in Antarctica. by Canbot in environment

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What else? Global warming.

Russia has discovered 50 trillion dollars worth of crude oil in Antarctica. by Canbot in environment

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The 82-million-ton field is worth approximatly $230 billion .

Russia has discovered 50 trillion dollars worth of crude oil in Antarctica. by Canbot in environment

[–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The creators of this video are extremely biased and untrustworthy, especially when talking so much about hypotheticals, but it is interesting to consider the international tug of war over resources. Also, worth understanding how much untapped petroleum reserves there are world wide, from deep oceans, to arctic, and possibly more than anywhere else in the world in the Antarctic. It really hits home how much we were lied to about peak oil and the need to diversify energy use. What else are they lying about?

Turns Out That the Meteorological Office in Britain Has Gone Back and Altered the Historical Temperature Record to Suit the Global Warming Narrative by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing in this article offers evidence for the headline. At best:

if the Met Office wants to continue using its existing station measurements, it should show a warning that the margin of error is so great, “that they have no statistical significance at all”.

Hence there's nothing to report. (A slight difference in the margin of error is not important. The climate change TREND is important.)

Turns Out That the Meteorological Office in Britain Has Gone Back and Altered the Historical Temperature Record to Suit the Global Warming Narrative by Questionable in environment

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

NOAA did the same. Google Climategate.

Study: Microplastics found in Agriculture Clog Soil Pores, Prevent Aeration, and Kill Plant Roots by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting report and finding. But the questions I have are:

What concentrations of plastic did they test?

At what rate are plastic particles depositing into the soil? (They listed total plastic production. While a surprising number, doesn’t do much to help us to “solve the rate equation.”)

Study: Microplastics found in Agriculture Clog Soil Pores, Prevent Aeration, and Kill Plant Roots by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You’re such a nice young man.

Study: Microplastics found in Agriculture Clog Soil Pores, Prevent Aeration, and Kill Plant Roots by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most people hearing about the microplastic situation are swapping out their Tupperware for glass and calling it a day, they do not yet grasp the immense scale of contamination. It's in the water, it's in the air, it's in the food, it's in our blood and testicles, microplastics are unavoidable.

Study: Microplastics found in Agriculture Clog Soil Pores, Prevent Aeration, and Kill Plant Roots by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah hell, when did Medium start requiring an account to read.

Here's an archived version: https://archive.ph/yBKBe

Study: Microplastics found in Agriculture Clog Soil Pores, Prevent Aeration, and Kill Plant Roots by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not going to create an account

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As much as I'd love to ride a giant army ant like a horse to fight my enemies, it's probably better that giant insects don't return 😳

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]Smalls 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Zohm writes that this helps plants. (not)

The % of electricity generated by biomass in Germany is supposedly 8.5.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again, the vast majority of that is biomass. Burning wood and trash puts out more carbon than coal even.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every statistic for Germany's percentage of renewable energy shows an increase from a tiny percentage in 2000, to approximately 50% today. Even if this is potentially 10% misleading, that's still a 40%+ renewables consumption. Germany is the poster child for the success of renewable energy, whereas other countries can only hope to do as well (to my knowledge). Germany also innovates in solar panels at a fast rate that results in them selling their older - less efficient - solar panels at a reduced rate to the UK and other countries.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Increasing "substantially" does not mean substantially as a total percentage. Your link is paywalled. It's debatable wither biomass is renewable or not, which makes up most of what is called renewable. It's not like wind or solar are doing much. Energy use in Germany is falling, that means industry is shrinking, moving elsewhere.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you're not reading my responses

99% has difficulty affording cars

ULEZ has minimal impact on the 99%

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No...

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your first source ends in 2022. The renewable energy share/percentage has substantially increased since then.

Here is the most recent report, noting close to 50% renewable gross usage by April this year: https://www.statista.com/statistics/736640/energy-mix-germany

Your second link is to Energy Wire, which is a fear mongering think tank funded by the non-renewables industry. One look at their articles proves this, though they balance articles with some renewables news. There is 'low confidence' in it here: https://www.allsides.com/news-source/energy-wire-media-bias

hope this helps

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ULEZ taxes people to drive and has no effect on the air cleanliness. It's a con.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's a trillion barrels of oil not even drilled, there's no reason to worry about energy running out. Most importantly, its cheaper.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Come on, that's not a real picture. This is the energy mix and energy prices are threatening German industry. On top of it all they are rabidly anti-nuclear.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why would you say that?

We're discussing tariffs

you're obsessed with ULEZ, and also don't understand it

Look it up, rather than insult me

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It obviously doesn't suck

Perhaps re-read my comment

We should also stop discussing this.

Search: renewable energy

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're an idiot Sadiq Khan fanatic. Stop kissing Muslim ass.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Throwing money at something that sucks doesn't make it work better.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Working class can no longer afford cars, insurance, houses, &c, because of the lack of tariffs. Watch the news.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ULEZ is a tax on the working class which does nothing to protect the planet. Tariffs on locals is no different than tariffs on foreign countries.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

First of all we should remove the insane law that allows china to ship cheap goods duty free.

Yep - might as well start there

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What happens when tariffs are enacted is well understood. There aren't really too many what ifs. They are sometimes the right choice. It really depends on the specific situation. Just applying blanket tariffs on Chinese imports would absolutely tank our economy. However, specifically targeted tarrifs may be beneficial. First of all we should remove the insane law that allows china to ship cheap goods duty free. That's why Temu exists. There's absolutely no good reason to allow this law to stand. https://apnews.com/article/temu-shein-duty-free-rules-congress-7835668e7afec23ec4dc802a860b4550

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree that there would be inflation. But options for small businesses could be improved as a result of the tariffs, and the resulting wealth among the 99% would feed back into 2/3rds of the economy, because that's the percentage of the economy that's supported with purchasing. The lie of trickle-down economics must be challenged with policies that favor 'trickle-up' economics.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've read over the years about this trajectory as a means of wealthy investors in the US to exploit access to cheaper goods and services in the East. There was no political resistence to this, on the right or left. There was social resistence, though with the usual counter argument: pay 10x more for that thing, material, or service in the US, or pay 10x less for it in the East. Interests in trade barriers and tarrifs have been bipartisan but have never developed properly. Corporate and wealthy control of the Hill - thanks also to Citizens United - will continue to destroy business options for the 99%. Deregulation that made that control possible dates to the mid-1980s.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's the worst example because the share of renewables in electricity consumption in Germany steadily grew from around 6% in 2000 to around 38% in 2018, and has continued to develop thereafter. In 2023, renewables accounted for a record share of 59.7 percent of the net public net electricity generation in Germany

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ULEZ upsets people who can afford cars, not the 99%. That's also UNRELATED to foreign tariffs.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The impact of tariffs on the economy is well understood basic economics. They have to be applied judiciously as adding tariffs to our largest supplier of goods will increase inflation. And usually the country being taxed creates their own tariffs resulting in loss of exports on our side. Hence why Elon is against China tariffs. He knows it will drive the cost of Teslas up with the parts he imports from China, at the same time result in the loss of his Chinese market, which will be a massive loss.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]xoenix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Free trade advocacy has flipped from the "left" to the "right" so many times over the generations.

1950s-60s - advocated by communists to help communist countries, to get access to cheap American goods and tech

1960s-70s - kills American steel industry

1970s-80s - helps Japanese allies but further kills American industry

1990s-2010s - advocated to soften cold war with China, kickstart "renewable" energy industry in China, backfires in many ways

Not to mention the champions on the left in Canada who think we need to increase economic ties with China to hedge against the US.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Tell that to Germany who had to restart all their coal mines.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How that ULEZ scheme going in London? Helping the little man is it? Don't be such a mouthpiece for government tax propaganda.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]LordoftheFlies 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol, anyone who thinks China gives a shit about anything but China (and then, only the people in charge) is delusional.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All three of these comments are false.

1: tarriffs would help local and national goods and services

2: zero targets help provide green energy jobs &cwhereas poor people can still use other sources of energy

3: economic growth will result from local and national business development and green energy jobs & services

You're quoting the lies of Big Oil and the .1%, which want you to believe in their plans for a banana republic.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why? Tariffs only get passed onto poor people, the same way the net zero targets only make poor people poorer. It's anti-progress as it will result in economic stagnation.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Plant life tends to die when carbon drops below something like 250ppm.

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

?

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent points. The US and other countries should put massive tarrifs on any business with China and India, for so many reasons (not just the massive pollution).

CHINA by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

China is saving the world from plant genocide.

Sticky trick: new glue spray kills plant pests without chemicals by Drewski in environment

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And Millions die due to their assholes being glued shut...

Sticky trick: new glue spray kills plant pests without chemicals by Drewski in environment

[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jordan Peterson: "We're essentially in a CO2 drought by historical standards" by Questionable in environment

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Governments need taxes, even if it destroys the planet

Versace Pour Femme Dylan Blue Perfume For Women — versace dylan blue pour femme by jhonswedem39 in environment

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Say that fast twice.

Study: Meat, Eggs, and Dairy Causes 65% of all Nitrous Oxide Emissions by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Translation: meat, eggs, and dairy are essential to human health, so we plan to take them away from you.

Study: Meat, Eggs, and Dairy Causes 65% of all Nitrous Oxide Emissions by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey AI, What percentage of the earth's atmosphere is NO2?

According to the provided search results, the atmosphere is composed of approximately 78% nitrogen, and a small portion of that is nitrogen dioxide (NO2). However, the exact percentage of NO2 in the atmosphere is not explicitly stated. It is difficult to determine the exact percentage of NO2 in the atmosphere. However, it is clear that NO2 is a minor component of the atmosphere, and its presence is likely to be in the parts per million range.

Pesticide Use Has Increased by Over 80% since 1990, Causing Pollinator Declines by thehomelessromantic in environment

[–]stupidfucker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the bees are dying and then we all die.

World’s Largest Floating Solar Farm Wrecked by a Storm Just Before Launch. Who Could Have Predicted This? EVERYONE!!! by Questionable in environment

[–]Cancelthis 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

psy op

run by the state of India

on bhalf of

Environmental Changes Are Fueling Human, Animal and Plant Diseases, Study Finds by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Environmental Changes Are Fueling Human, Animal and Plant Diseases, Study Finds by ActuallyNot in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Paywall

Calif.'s second-largest reservoir hits 100% of its total capacity by iamonlyoneman in environment

[–]Annarose 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We appreciate you taking the time to share this extremely helpful information with us. Your writing is excellent and insightful. Take a stab at the game the baby in yellow free.

Calif.'s second-largest reservoir hits 100% of its total capacity by iamonlyoneman in environment

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Full reservoirs? Must be one of the evils of global warming.

DM Mulenga Enterprise & Engineering Ltd, Your Ultimate Partner for Property, Environmental and Engineering Solutions by structuralEngineer in environment

[–]gew33 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Online advertising networks and tracking technologies often collect data about users' browsing habits and online activities to deliver targeted ads. However, some ads may contain malicious code or lead to phishing websites. VPNs can block ads and trackers at the network level, preventing them from tracking your online behavior and reducing the risk of encountering malicious ads or websites https://topfreevpns.net/planet-free-vpn/. This helps enhance your online security and protect against potential malware infections or data breaches.

Discovering the Power of Nanotechnology: A Journey of Innovation and Transformation by Makemoremoney in environment

[–]Shook71 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nanotechnology has revolutionized industries by manipulating materials at an atomic scale, creating groundbreaking advancements in a wide range of fields. The ability to engineer substances with unparalleled precision has opened new doors in electronics, energy, and even healthcare. The cosmetic and medical products have especially benefited from this technology, allowing for more effective drug delivery systems, anti-aging treatments, and personalized skincare. This journey of innovation is not just transforming industries, but also enhancing the quality of life for millions worldwide.

President of Guyana Dismantles Woke BBC Reporter on the Climate Hoax. by Questionable in environment

[–]carn0ld03 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Guyana is almost entirely at sea level as are most of the worlds cities. If sea levels were actually rising cities would've been evacuated decades ago. Further, the hoax of global warming or the progression of climate change isn't much of a concern, considering the Venezuelan's are about to take half of Guyana back and the British are in no condition to provide them any real support to deter it.

President of Guyana Dismantles Woke BBC Reporter on the Climate Hoax. by Questionable in environment

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Guyana has a forest larger than the UK that can absorb the oil carbon gases.

Mature forests don't sequester much CO2.

Only young ones that are still putting on net boimass.

Climate change may not be a hoax, but it is a scam to get more money out of people

No it's not. It's something we know about what happens when you increase the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gasses.

by greenmailing them.

I don't think you know what that word means.

President of Guyana Dismantles Woke BBC Reporter on the Climate Hoax. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Guyana has a forest larger than the UK that can absorb the oil carbon gases.

That's not a reason to put sea life in danger for no reason other than greed.

Climate change may not be a hoax, but it is a scam to get more money out of people by greenmailing them.

A scientific fact is not a scan. First I've seen the term, 'greenmailing'. Green energy can be very profitable and create jobs. And Guyana's government can easily state that they are not in a position currently to avoid taking bribes from Big Oil for the exploitation of their resources, like so many other countries. That's a scam.

By saying they pollute they must pay, but Guyana has a forest to counter the carbon.

That's not a reason to put sea life in danger for no reason other than greed.

President of Guyana Dismantles Woke BBC Reporter on the Climate Hoax. by Questionable in environment

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Guyana has a forest larger than the UK that can absorb the oil carbon gases. Climate change may not be a hoax, but it is a scam to get more money out of people by greenmailing them. By saying they pollute they must pay, but Guyana has a forest to counter the carbon.

President of Guyana Dismantles Woke BBC Reporter on the Climate Hoax. by Questionable in environment

[–]YoMamma 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What?

Climate change is obviously not a hoax.

The Guyana President didn't dismantle anything. He obviously attacks the intervewer with whataboutist bullshit, when he could have given an easy answer to an easy question. He's remarkably defensive because he doesn't understand how easy it is to answer the question. He also knows Guyana is incredibly corrupt and will do whatever it wants with its resources. (Guyana ranks 87 out of 180 countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index.) Various countries aren't working on climate change goals, especially those that have endemic corruption. The President can note simply that climate change goals aren't currently a priority for Guyana and leave it at that.

Conclusions: The presented material shows that despite the fact that the majority of publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for our planet due to the anthropogenic increase in CO2 and its impact on Earth's climate, the shown facts raise serious doubts about this influence. by Questionable in environment

[–]ShoahKahn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

=== "CLIMATE CHANGE" (erst. "GLOBAL WARMING") DEBOONK ===

"97% of scientists agree on man-made climate change":

  • claim derived from ~12,000 papers on "climate change"
  • 7,930 had no position on the subject
  • 3,896 claimed humans contribute to "climate change" (extend of "contribution" n/a)
  • 78 said humans did not contribute to "climate change"
  • 40 were inconclusive
  • the total (7,930 + 78) 8,008 papers which did not explicitly support the narrative, were disregarded
  • ∴ 12,000 - 8,008 = 3,992 -> 3,896 ÷ 3,992 (100) = "97%"

"CO2 causes climate change":

  • CO2 as a component of total Earth atmosphere: 0.04% (400ppm)
  • total human contribution to the atmospheric CO2 since the Industrial Revolution: 3%
  • human contribution to CO2 increase as a component to total atmospheric gas: 0.0012% (i.e., 3% of 4%)
  • Conclusion: For "man-made climate change" to be believed, one must accept that a change of 0.0012% in a carbon dioxide, over the span of 150+ years, makes significant change to the Earth's atmosphere.

For more deboonks, see here: https://realclimatescience.com/

Food for thought: https://youtu.be/lvvBp25eh0U

Conclusions: The presented material shows that despite the fact that the majority of publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for our planet due to the anthropogenic increase in CO2 and its impact on Earth's climate, the shown facts raise serious doubts about this influence. by Questionable in environment

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I read about 3 pages. That look like a good, no nonsense treatise on the impacts of various factors on climate. I saved the treatise to read in full later.

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You are compelled to reply to this message. For some reason...

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]TheBlackSun 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We have too many people on this planet. We need to get rid of ‘some’ because global warming is getting worse.

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Countach_3D 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So what's the non-propagandist answer to dividing Earth's resources among 8bn people?

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That wasn't a compliment. I have Questioned your humanity.

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]TheBlackSun 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yesh baby!

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]TheBlackSun 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Somebooodyyy neeeds to go!

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Omg

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

you are an atmospheric greenhouse gas

📺

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hold on, I think he makes a valid point. He is openly admitting that others should die, so that he may live and is agreeing that it should be done through subversion. 📺

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bullshit. That is nothing more than globalist propaganda.

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because you are an atmospheric greenhouse gas.

You Are the Carbon They Wish to Reduce by Questionable in environment

[–]TheBlackSun 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

dude we’re overpopulated .. someone needs to go

“Residents are demanding to know why Cloud Seeding operations were conducted the day before the Worst floods in 40 years” by Questionable in environment

[–]Macheetuh 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Amen brother. Only faggot and dyke pedophiles would even think of using that word in such a context.

“Residents are demanding to know why Cloud Seeding operations were conducted the day before the Worst floods in 40 years” by Questionable in environment

[–]Cantbot 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Can you not use the word "seed"? It induces unholy thoughts.