Ceiling Partition - GDT Services Visit - https://gdtservices.com.sg/ceiling-partition by [deleted] in environment

[–]ceilingpartition 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

GDT is best ceiling partition Specialist in Singapore. We Provide Reasonable Warranty For Suitable Works . Visit - https://gdtservices.com.sg/ceiling-partition

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]POOPCORN 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Once upon a time, in a small rural town named Meadowville, there lived a farmer named John. He was an ordinary man with an extraordinary idea that would change the way people thought about farming. You see, John was facing a significant challenge – there was a shortage of open farming land in his region, and his farm was on the brink of foreclosure.

Determined to save his family's livelihood, John started thinking outside the box. He spent countless nights researching and experimenting until he stumbled upon a revolutionary concept. Inspired by advancements in biotechnology, John devised a method to grow meat in his pants. Yes, you read that correctly – his pants.

With limited farming space available, John realized that he could utilize the warmth and humidity of his pants to create a controlled environment for growing meat. He carefully designed a system of tubes and chambers that would provide the necessary nutrients, temperature, and moisture for the meat to thrive. It was an unorthodox approach, but John believed it could be the answer to his farming woes.

Word of John's unconventional farming method quickly spread throughout the town. People were both fascinated and skeptical, unsure of how meat could possibly grow in someone's pants. However, when they saw the results firsthand – succulent cuts of meat produced by this peculiar process – they were amazed.

The town's skepticism soon transformed into curiosity, and before long, John's pants became the talk of the region. Restaurants and markets eagerly lined up to purchase his unique, locally grown meat. John's farm, once on the brink of foreclosure, now thrived with a newfound sense of purpose.

However, while John's farming endeavors brought financial stability to his family, it didn't come without its share of personal challenges. His wife, Sarah, had always been supportive, but the stress of their financial struggles took a toll on her. She turned to drugs as a means to cope, seeking solace in the temporary escape they provided.

Desperate to help save the farm, Sarah turned to a life she never imagined she would lead – prostitution. It was a dark secret she kept hidden from her family, working late nights in the shadows of the town's underbelly. Her heart ached with guilt, but she believed it was the only way to keep their farm afloat.

Meanwhile, their daughter, Emily, was growing up in a world shadowed by the family's hardships. She saw firsthand the toll it took on her mother and the strain it put on their relationships. As she grew older, she found herself drawn to a life that offered quick money and power – the world of drugs.

Emily became a drug dealer, navigating the dangerous underworld with ease. Her sharp wit and intelligence made her a force to be reckoned with. But it didn't end there. Emily's skills caught the attention of a clandestine organization, and she was recruited as a professional assassin. Her life became a delicate balance between dealing drugs and carrying out covert missions, all while keeping her true identity hidden from her family.

Uncle Frank, John's eccentric and free-spirited brother, added yet another layer of complexity to their already complicated lives. Frank was a transgender cabaret dancer, unapologetically embracing his true self and challenging societal norms. He had always been a guiding light for John, offering support and acceptance in a world that often shunned those who dared to be different.

While the family struggled with their individual battles, they always found solace and support within each other's company. Despite their unconventional circumstances, they loved one another deeply and drew strength from their bond.

As time went on, John's pants became a symbol of resilience and innovation. The town began to view them not as a source of amusement, but as a testament to human ingenuity and determination. People marveled at the farmer who

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was always going to fail when environmentalists have downplayed and outright lied about the emissions needed to support their own lifestyle for decades.

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not on this site.

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reason for my other comment.

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would change that to "Just eat the vegan"

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]ShekelPa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wrong. Literally everything they have forced onto the world in an effort to fight the climate boogeyman has ALWAYS been significantly worse than what they intended to replace.

This is simply another example of a half assed attempt to get the goyim to adhere to communism

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]carn0ld03 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's also tumorous tissue likely to provoke cancer it its consumers.

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]BowlerHat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's still a new technology, making fun of it now is premature

Just eat the cow | Lab grown meat produces up to 25 times more CO2 emissions than the beef it's supposed to replace by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]ZomFox 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Epic fail.

Engineers develop water filtration system that removes 'forever chemicals' by Drewski in environment

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I haven't watch this also but RO creates a lot of waste water, often twice as much as the clean water, so maybe that's what it's better at.

Engineers develop water filtration system that removes 'forever chemicals' by Drewski in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I think people are ignorant of what's on the market, honestly. Some city in California with like 300 residents has a well that was poisoned by runoff from a farm 13 years ago. They can't use the water from the city taps . . . and the story was a tear-jerker about how these poor people have to travel 40 miles to the next town to take a shower. In over a decade, nobody can figure out how to put a big RO filter on this little town, nor how to give every home an RO system?

Skill issue.

Engineers develop water filtration system that removes 'forever chemicals' by Drewski in environment

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I came here to ask the same question. I have one of these, and I recently checked if it filters out dioxins, and yes it does so very well... I was going to replace it immediately given that I am downwind AND downstream from East Palestine...

Engineers develop water filtration system that removes 'forever chemicals' by Drewski in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not watching a video. How is this superior to mature reverse osmosis filtration which already does the same thing?

'What Percent Of Our Atmosphere Is CO2?': Doug LaMalfa Stumps Entire Panel With Climate Questions by EvilDed in environment

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I remember correctly it is around 0.1-0.3%.

I wasn't too far off, 0.04% according to https://www.space.com/17683-earth-atmosphere.html

'What Percent Of Our Atmosphere Is CO2?': Doug LaMalfa Stumps Entire Panel With Climate Questions by EvilDed in environment

[–]EvilDed[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's everything about money. Carbon taxes equate to an unlimited stream of money for the government from business and citizens for what is essentially pseudoscience. Educational institutions get government funding, tenures and subsidies to push this pseudoscience. Some business profits from the green initiatives by lobbying dipshit politicians who are willing to make an extra buck to read from the narrative and give contracts their way. It's nearly always about money over power. Lockdowns and COVID were everything about selling ppe contra ts, vaccines and increasing profits on monopoly business over small business, pushing interest rates and raising debt. Money.

'What Percent Of Our Atmosphere Is CO2?': Doug LaMalfa Stumps Entire Panel With Climate Questions by EvilDed in environment

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This isnt just about lobbying. It's about more power for politicians and less power for the people. Like two weeks to flatten the curve extended to centuries.

'What Percent Of Our Atmosphere Is CO2?': Doug LaMalfa Stumps Entire Panel With Climate Questions by EvilDed in environment

[–]EvilDed[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As long as you're lobbyists pay you, you don't have to read what they pay you to say, correct.

'What Percent Of Our Atmosphere Is CO2?': Doug LaMalfa Stumps Entire Panel With Climate Questions by EvilDed in environment

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a politician you dont have to fully understand the science behind your decisions. You just trust the science as long as it is beneficial for you and your party. Thats true in bad and good decisions.

'What Percent Of Our Atmosphere Is CO2?': Doug LaMalfa Stumps Entire Panel With Climate Questions by EvilDed in environment

[–]EvilDed[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd have thought it were obvious. If the people passing legislation based on an underlying statistic such as co2 increase in the atmosphere have no idea of the very basic facts it's based on such as the actual content of co2 in the atmosphere, how can they understand the impact their changes will make? These people all guess at a figure significantly greater than the actual figure which tells you it's more likely bullshit. If I were to guess, someone gets paid more if they all vote to ignore the facts and pass the bill?

'What Percent Of Our Atmosphere Is CO2?': Doug LaMalfa Stumps Entire Panel With Climate Questions by EvilDed in environment

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not sure what his point is though.

Switching to Hydrogen Fuel Could Cause Long-Term Climate Consequences by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imagine a Ford Pinto exploding but causing an area the size of 3 mile island to become uninhabitable.

Switching to Hydrogen Fuel Could Cause Long-Term Climate Consequences by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]chadwickofwv 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The whole shift to hydrogen is a complete farce. Largely because the "human caused" climate change is complete bullshit in the first place. Add to it that hydrogen is very hard to contain and extremely explosive. Far more explosive than gasoline.

Switching to Hydrogen Fuel Could Cause Long-Term Climate Consequences by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is an interesting conundrum. However, there's some wording in the article that says "if a certain amount of hydrogen plus methane escapes, you might as well burn fossil fuels". I found that interesting, so I decided to poke around a bit more into the funders of the institute that wrote the paper. From an article entitled How much is Princeton’s contract with Exxon worth? Why does it matter?:

In July of 2020, Princeton renewed a contract with ExxonMobil. A press release by the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment did not disclose how much the contract was worth. The former contract of 2015 was worth $5 million — $1 million per year for 5 years.

Make of that what you will.

This is, after all, what it truly means to live with a “forever” chemical. by Orangutan in environment

[–]cant_even 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bottom-center B/W picture: I saw lots of people equipped like that in S.Korea in 1984. They'd march through the rice paddies in rows, spraying away...

Never thought about it before, but I also remember there were hardly any birds there.

Levels of carcinogenic chemical near Ohio derailment site far above safe limit by Drewski in environment

[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

true. that'd be better though, they shouldn't have burnt it. They should have let it just be in the soil around the train tracks, but they'd need to remove all the toxic soil which would be costly and take time and they wanted to reopen the train tracks quickly.

Levels of carcinogenic chemical near Ohio derailment site far above safe limit by Drewski in environment

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There’s still plenty of VCM around. It is still in the soil and was shown as a sheen on bodies of water.

Levels of carcinogenic chemical near Ohio derailment site far above safe limit by Drewski in environment

[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"The data probably confirms fears that the controlled burn of vinyl chloride in the days after the train wreck in the town created dioxin and dispersed it throughout the area, experts say, though they stressed the new data is of limited value because only two soil samples were checked."

Levels of carcinogenic chemical near Ohio derailment site far above safe limit by Drewski in environment

[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

pete refusing to go there for so long and biden still refusing tells us all it's toxic

Levels of carcinogenic chemical near Ohio derailment site far above safe limit by Drewski in environment

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I’d be more concerned with exposure to the vinyl chloride monomer. That’s some very nasty chemical.

Levels of carcinogenic chemical near Ohio derailment site far above safe limit by Drewski in environment

[–]Drewski[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

**Syntropic Agroforestry** by EddieC in environment

[–]UbiquitousCultOfSelf 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know if you're still here from a year ago....

Automated healthcare system for better care delivery by rachvictor05 in environment

[–]rachvictor05[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every industry it touches is being transformed by automation. By requiring less human intervention, it significantly boosts productivity, efficiency, and error reduction. Even in the field of medicine, the same is true. Both hospitals and outpatient care facilities handle a considerable volume of operational duties. The burden increases with the size of the organisation. Automation in healthcare industry can lessen this burden and improve workflow effectiveness. When automation was implemented a few years ago, patients had to phone the hospital, wait in line, ask about the available time slots, and then choose a time. A staff member would have needed to answer every phone, check a calendar for availability, and notify the patients on the other end of the line. A patient was required to call back and repeat the entire process if they were unable to attend for whatever reason.

Ocean treaty: Historic agreement reached after decade of talks - "The High Seas Treaty aims to place 30% of the seas into protected areas by 2030, to safeguard and recuperate marine nature." by neolib in environment

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is another AGENDA 21 TREATY.

Another NWO coup.

Ocean treaty: Historic agreement reached after decade of talks - "The High Seas Treaty aims to place 30% of the seas into protected areas by 2030, to safeguard and recuperate marine nature." by neolib in environment

[–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I love fish. Let me be more precise: I love eating fish. And because I love eating fish, I want fish to be around for the rest of my life, and because I'm not a greedy dickhead, for future generations as well. It would be better if 60% of the oceans were protected.

China has more CO2 emissions than every developed nation combined ( Where's Greta & John Kerry?) China is also one of the top Ocean polluters & #1 on the list may surprise you (Greta?) by Chipit in environment

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, that's what they're paid to do. I was meaning that I don't understand the economic benefit to - say, Canada - of shipping a container of garbage halfway across the world.

China has more CO2 emissions than every developed nation combined ( Where's Greta & John Kerry?) China is also one of the top Ocean polluters & #1 on the list may surprise you (Greta?) by Chipit in environment

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Philippines does make sense in the ocean waste polluters chart in that tweet. They've done a lot of "recycling" business where 1st world countries ship them containers of plastic trash and they essentially just dump it in the ocean. Not sure how you make money out of that, but I'm sure carbon credits are involved.

China has more CO2 emissions than every developed nation combined ( Where's Greta & John Kerry?) China is also one of the top Ocean polluters & #1 on the list may surprise you (Greta?) by Chipit in environment

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thats because China has more people than every developed nation too, so it's not surprising if you have any understanding of basic statistics. Its a bit different if you look at CO2 per capita. The U.S. has much higher emissions per person than China, about twice as high actually, but they have 4x more people than us

https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-per-capita/

China has more CO2 emissions than every developed nation combined ( Where's Greta & John Kerry?) China is also one of the top Ocean polluters & #1 on the list may surprise you (Greta?) by Chipit in environment

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They would execute that little muppet so fast if she should up in China with her "HOW DARE YOU" shit.

China was there.

China has more CO2 emissions than every developed nation combined ( Where's Greta & John Kerry?) China is also one of the top Ocean polluters & #1 on the list may surprise you (Greta?) by Chipit in environment

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

China has more CO2 emissions than every developed nation combined

Not yet. US is still ahead of China

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1007454/cumulative-co2-emissions-worldwide-by-country/

Where's Greta

Norway right now i think.

John Kerry

Returning from Panama tonight, I guess.

China has more CO2 emissions than every developed nation combined ( Where's Greta & John Kerry?) China is also one of the top Ocean polluters & #1 on the list may surprise you (Greta?) by Chipit in environment

[–]Bonn1770 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Kek they would execute that little muppet so fast if she showed up in China with her "HOW DARE YOU" shit. Besides, Climate Change is the fault of white people and they need to PAY.

You Can Turn Your Backyard Into a Biodiversity Hotspot by Drewski in environment

[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Venice has long been known for its perennial flooding, but now it's facing the opposite problem: A long stretch of atypically low tides have left the ancient city with low water and dry canals, making many of its famous waterways unnavigable for the iconic gondolas and boats that ply its waterways. by Orangutan in environment

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's blamed on both the tides, and a drought. Did you open up google maps from the link I sent you? I asked you to find the canals linked to the river!

You are drawing absurd conclusions from one picture.

I sent you a god damn map! What are you even doing right now? They are ocean islands!

https://www.businessinsider.com/low-tides-leave-venices-canals-dry-months-after-heavy-flooding-2021-2?op=1

Venice, dubbed the 'Floating City,' is comprised of 118 small islands and is navigated by canals and more than 400 bridges. It has a population of over 260,000.

I would draw you a picture, but that's what the God damned map is for!!!!!!

However, local reports described the tides of 'acqua bassa,' or low water with images showing the city's iconic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQL2vjLqo7w

Venice, built on a collection of small islands within a saltwater lagoon off the northeastern coast of Italy, has always lived with tides that usually create variations of around 50 cm in sea levels but which can sometimes be more extreme.

You are a person who thinks you can build a damn to change this! At this point, this is wilful ignorance on your part.

The ocean is not receding.

https://globe-today.com/world/2023/02/venice-waterways-dry-up-as-italy-braces-for-another-year-of-severe-drought/amp/

The problems in Venice are being blamed not just on a lack of rain, but also a high pressure system, a full moon and sea currents.

Sea currents? Rivers, one photo. Got it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZlXdw8gML8

Venice has long been known for its perennial flooding, but now it's facing the opposite problem: A long stretch of atypically low tides have left the ancient city with low water and dry canals, making many of its famous waterways unnavigable for the iconic gondolas and boats that ply its waterways. by Orangutan in environment

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Are you not asking yourself how the ocean is receding this far?

The ocean is not receding. You are drawing absurd conclusions from one picture.

Venice has long been known for its perennial flooding, but now it's facing the opposite problem: A long stretch of atypically low tides have left the ancient city with low water and dry canals, making many of its famous waterways unnavigable for the iconic gondolas and boats that ply its waterways. by Orangutan in environment

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What?

A dam to hold the water in the canals. More precisely, several dams at the ends of several canals creating a grid of enclosed waterways.

Venice has long been known for its perennial flooding, but now it's facing the opposite problem: A long stretch of atypically low tides have left the ancient city with low water and dry canals, making many of its famous waterways unnavigable for the iconic gondolas and boats that ply its waterways. by Orangutan in environment

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

A damn to hold in the ocean water from the sea? On a man made island with an elevation of 3 feet, while the rising sea levels recede?

Talk about greenwashing! Let's do some chemistry on mine waste from an asbestos mine, dump it in the ocean, and say we're fighting global warming. by iamonlyoneman in environment

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We used to care that Ukraine was bombing their East Ukrainian mines and risking polluting the drinking water table for the entire area of the continent. One of those mine shafts contain Russian nuclear testing waste. Usually, the area they've bombed for the last 10 years, nearly non-stop, contain mines that need power 24/7 to keep the mine pumps on so the shafts don't flood, spilling the poisonous mining materials from the dozens of mines, as well as the nuclear waste from the one, into the environment.

Nothing's ever good enough for these fuckers - Blockades put green hydrogen project at risk by hfxB0oyA in environment

[–]Vulptex[A] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Removed: you're not allowed to post porn on saidit.

'This Is Criminal': BP Cuts Climate Pledges While Reporting Record $28 Billion in Profit by [deleted] in environment

[–]Raindeer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hold up now you Judgmental bastards, What's wrong with the filthy wealthy crushing it in the face of these tricky economic times? Yeah that's right!! Why can't you just be happy for them? lol

'This Is Criminal': BP Cuts Climate Pledges While Reporting Record $28 Billion in Profit by [deleted] in environment

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Global warming is a hoax.

'This Is Criminal': BP Cuts Climate Pledges While Reporting Record $28 Billion in Profit by [deleted] in environment

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Try their NET income, instead of their Gross income....They made back 1/5 this year, of they lost last year...

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/BP/bp/net-income

'This Is Criminal': BP Cuts Climate Pledges While Reporting Record $28 Billion in Profit by [deleted] in environment

[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In what reality has BP "struggled for years" when they consistently have posted profits in the double-digit BILLIONS of dollars year after year? Source: https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/BP/bp/gross-profit

'This Is Criminal': BP Cuts Climate Pledges While Reporting Record $28 Billion in Profit by [deleted] in environment

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oil companies struggled for years and had one good year, probably not even breaking even. It is a high risk industry, which requires huge investments, and the ability to ride out those investments for half-decade slumps at a time. During the last US administration, oil had a negative value. I'm not sure what it takes for people to understand the massive gravity of what that means...

It is an industry that keeps society from collapsing, keeps millions from freezing in the winter, dying from heat in the summer, and keeps us from depending on Russian oil, while ensuring our military can function.

Since Blunder-Biden wasted all of our National Emergency Stockpile selling it to South America for a quick buck to soften his pile of deficit overspending bills, then he began threatening our oil producers with legal attacks about profiting during World War 3, for not increasing oil production fast enough after being lambasted to end their oil production for alternatives, while we erased a decade and half of Obama's efforts to achieve energy independence in less than a year....

...We are going to desperately need those abused and battered domestic producers of energy for our nation's immediate survival.

U.S Scientists Make Major Breakthrough in ‘Limitless, Zero-Carbon’ Fusion Energy by Questionable in environment

[–]Karsonisozk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They will get paid the same amount to sell fusion energy that the corporations who operate gas-powered plants do when they sell their energy. https://vampiresurvivors.net

Train derailment, massive explosion and fire in Ohio…This is the alternative to stationary pipelines that can't be derailed and don't explode by accident. by iamonlyoneman in environment

[–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We just took out the Nord Stream pipelines... I don't think a static target is safer in today's environment.

Tackle 'Abuse of Water' by Big Ag and Big Oil, Advocates Say Amid Colorado River Fight by [deleted] in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Big ag feeds the people and big oil gets the goods to market FYI

Business owners see cutting carbon emissions as ‘the right thing to do’, despite the challenges of making change by [deleted] in environment

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Business owners see pandering to eco-fear-traumatized generation as good marketing, but popular eco-goals are unrealistic and financially impractical.

Business owners see cutting carbon emissions as ‘the right thing to do’, despite the challenges of making change by [deleted] in environment

[–]1Icemonkey 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a business owner I can tell you I don’t give a fuck about carbon.

Business owners see cutting carbon emissions as ‘the right thing to do’, despite the challenges of making change by [deleted] in environment

[–]brimshae 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for the propaganda. I was going to go spray a can of hair spray straight in to a lake but this made me change my mind!

Business owners see cutting carbon emissions as ‘the right thing to do’, despite the challenges of making change by [deleted] in environment

[–]IkeConn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck that shit. You cut your carbon. I'll ignore you.

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]Evola 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh yeah, spooked me for a couple of months looking at the death clocks when it first hit the block and I've been at the game for years now. If they can fool someone like me I can't imagine how religiously dogmatic the average person on the street really is.

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They truly believe we will assume AI is impartial at this phase?

No, they think you are too afraid to question their obvious fraud.

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The data used in all climate "science" is also massively manipulated, making all older temperatures much lower than their recorded values and all recent data higher than the recorded values.

It's fraud at every step.

Did you know that the computer models do not even include clouds or the sun?

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]ShekelPa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh no, tear up the constitution!

Yeah, the same AI technology that has been programmed to spew out leftist filth that we have seen numerous accounts of.

They truly believe we will assume AI is impartial at this phase?

'Stop Drilling and Start Paying': Greenpeace Activists Occupy Shell Oil Platform by [deleted] in environment

[–]scornedandsedated 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe these motherfuckers should go protest the lithium mines, where child slave labor is digging up precious toxic lithium to power the electric cars that will save the planet.

Oh, wait, that's actually dangerous.

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]cm18 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AI is GIGO (Garbage in == Garbage out)....

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every single prediction to date has been proven wrong.

It is NOT science unless they can openly show the math, and that algorythm can be shown to make accurate predictions.

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]Evola 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AI is just a calculator right now. What data has been fed into it?

I've heard enough rumours about the overinflation of the temperatures from misplaced stations to doubt it's validity.

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]Alphix 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is nothing left to say after this.

'Stop Drilling and Start Paying': Greenpeace Activists Occupy Shell Oil Platform by [deleted] in environment

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those activists should be forced to swim to the shore and walk home.

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]BISH 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

An AI study??? Some fake bullshit.

I remember when New York was supposed to be under water by the year 2000.

Global warming is a hoax.

It's not about saving the planet. The actual goal is to control all energy sources, and therefore control all of modern society.

They want a slave system.

AI Study Warns World Could Hit 2℃ Within Decades—Even With Emissions Cuts by [deleted] in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's NOTHING. My neighborhood exceeded that in a single day every day for the whole past year

'Stop Drilling and Start Paying': Greenpeace Activists Occupy Shell Oil Platform by [deleted] in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the 'good old days', they would be shot and shoved into the ocean and nobody would know about it.

Just saying.

Amid fears of contamination, Japan will soon dump treated water from Fukushima Nuclear Plant into the Pacific by [deleted] in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no fear of contamination in the mind of anyone whose opinion is worth listening to on this topic.

Amid fears of contamination, Japan will soon dump treated water from Fukushima Nuclear Plant into the Pacific by [deleted] in environment

[–]HiddenFox 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's like they saw the Godzilla movies and are like "How can we make this happen in real life?"

Amid fears of contamination, Japan will soon dump treated water from Fukushima Nuclear Plant into the Pacific by [deleted] in environment

[–]carn0ld03 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's gotta go somewhere...

Health Experts Warn Against Releasing Indian Point Radioactive Wastewater Into Hudson River by [deleted] in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're worrying about tritium, which has a half-life of 12.3 years. It's been 45 years according to the article which means it's down to 7% of the original radiation. There are no stated measurements, and they say "there's no safe minimum" which means they are talking about extremely small amounts. I bet 10 fake internet points this is less radiation than these "people" receive on their river water than comes from the smokestacks of their coal-fired electric plants every year.

So the article seems like pure FUD.

Then they compare it to the Fukushima water which, on initial release, had literally zero effect on anything because it was so low a level of radiation.

Biden Restores Vital Protections for Tongass National Forest Gutted by Trump by [deleted] in environment

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This article's portrayal isn't very accurate and misses a lot of context. It also blames Trump for some click bait reason.

We are talking about the 9.37 million acre Alaskan pan handle out of the ~50 million acre road-less rule that the Federal Government imposed on several states, despite many very long running protests. The Tongass National Forrest is a pristine (temperate) rainforest with ecological importance and needs protected, but the carelessly broad banning of use of the land against local protest isn't required to accomplish this.

The Alaskan state government has pretty much always opposed the imposing rule. They've claimed it hurts tourism by preventing people from getting to these wilderness areas, prevents their forestry departments from properly maintaining the forest, which risks wildfires and infestations of invasive insect or plant species, and needlessly prevents industry, which could go through the forest without large impact. The inability to connect electrical power through the forest to the neighboring areas has also cost some communities enormous amounts. They weren't the only state opposing the rule, several other states the rules impact opposed it endlessly as well.

It wasn't just politicians in suits who opposed the rule, though. We have a great record of who supported it and opposed it,, as well as what their concerns were, through the many drawn out request for public comment efforts of preparing for the rule. The law requires public input for the use of public land and many concerns were raised, as well as an outpouring of support based on dumbed down articles like this one.

Many locals who lived there opposed it, for the impact it would have on their daily lives. Despite what these shifty propaganda articles say when only cherry picking quotes from one side to deceptively frame the situation, many of the native tribal leaders imposed it as well. They feared impact on their daily lives and erasing their economic opportunities. At the time of the rule, many tribal leaders were against it, while others were in support. Many argued it encroached treaties and their rights to movement. ANILCA laws give natives and landowner a right of access across national forests and lands.

From just after the very start in ~1999 the idea was already criticized and the Tongass forest was consider for exemption, starting with a 5 year review for just this area. This was partly procedural as the National Environmental Policy Act requires "balancing population needs and resource use." They also had a responsibility to give a transition period for those who were being displaced or losing their livelihood due to the new rule.

This rule also ran cross to several federal and local laws. Eventually most were smoothed out, but many required re-interpretation to do it. Laws like the Organic Act, the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act, and National Forest Management Act required the use be made public, be allowed for many public things, including resources like mining and logging, and to be able to maintain the forest. Several environmental agencies had concerns that if the forest wasn't managed property, by doing prescribed logging, clearing brush, and "raking" (bulldozers with rake attachments), that those serious concerns of wildfires and infestations would be serious, similar to the exact thing that happened to California after years of neglecting their legally required forestry maintenance (combined with over use of river waters, irresponsible overbuilding, and other factors).

There were over 600 public hearings, 1.6 million public comments, rule amendments/adjustments, lawsuits, moratoriums, appeals, Supreme Court requests, and delays over the swathing rules from many states, people, and industries impacted, as well as concern that the rule may have a negative impact on the environment without many provisions.....that the 1998 propose rule wasn't really settled until 2011....except for Alaska's Tongass area, who's state continued to protest and litigate the imposing rule.

At one point Tongass got an exemption to the rule ordered by the courts, then it was taken way, appealed, then taken away again. Tongass' place in the rule wasn't really worked out until 2016. The DC District court, a divided panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and a split vote, then the US court of appeals, the Supreme Court denying to hear it, and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, eventually all end Alaska's last state legal challenges, after another appeal.

The USDA, who wanted Tongass exempted since 2000 and the Forest Service worked their legally required procedures, which are required to be based on science and laws, and presented a plan to work of a compromised special rule for the state of Alaska, to ease its impact. The started with announcements and a an Environmental Impact Study.

Since the logging industry no longer made economic sens for a long time, and isn't a reason for concern, despite this stupid article.....in 2017 the Forestry Department stated that 53 projects within the roadless area in Alaska had been submitted and approved, including 34 mining projects, 10 hydropower or utility connection projects, and a geothermal lease.

There's really no connection to Trump having anything to do with this 20 year long battle. The only connection Trump had to it, aside from the legal hearings finishing during his term, is a super biased activist article by the always questionable shit-birds at the Washington Post, who cited 3 secret sources "briefed on the issue"....by, as they explain, claimed to be told about a 3rd hand conversation, by state governors, who somehow knew form another conversation. WaPo and NYT seem to play hot potato with being the fake source.

more source, strait from the activists who spearheaded it all: https://earthjustice.org/features/timeline-of-the-roadless-rule

'Shameful': UK Approves 'Emergency' Use of Banned Bee-Killing Pesticide by [deleted] in environment

[–]Dregan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

University of Sussex biology professor Dave Goulson "has estimated that a single teaspoon of thiamethoxam—one of three neonicotinoids produced by Bayer, the German biotech corporation that merged with agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018—is toxic enough to wipe out 1.25 billion bees"

What could go wrong?

'Shameful': UK Approves 'Emergency' Use of Banned Bee-Killing Pesticide by [deleted] in environment

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is what freedom and deregulation looks like guys.

Remember this when you argue for small government, you don't get to pick and choose which bits shrink.

'Shameful': UK Approves 'Emergency' Use of Banned Bee-Killing Pesticide by [deleted] in environment

[–]KongPongMooHong 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Killing bees should be way down at the bottom of our list of priorities.

Bees should be declared as the MOST endangered species in the entire world.

Rainforest Carbon Offsets Used by Major Corporations 'Largely Worthless': Analysis by [deleted] in environment

[–]Methane 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I coulda told you that 10 years ago. oh wait, that's what i've been ACTUALLY SAYING for the past 10 years. Where's my study money?

"The implications of this analysis are huge,"

Yeah, if you say so. Doubt you'll change their course. They knew it was a grift right from the start.

Crimes against humanity. Taking advantage purely for profit. They're all con artists.

UN Secretary-General Appeals for Urgent Action as World Faces ‘Category 5 Storm’ by [deleted] in environment

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hm. the people aren't reacting to the last round of hyperbole. Better turn it up to 5.

Freshwater Fish Contain ‘Staggering’ Amount of Toxic PFAS Chemicals, Study Finds by [deleted] in environment

[–]panel30 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I had assumed freshwater would be cleaner than ocean. Is that true? Is stuff from the ocean even worse? I guess I'd have to more research to find out.

Freshwater Fish Contain ‘Staggering’ Amount of Toxic PFAS Chemicals, Study Finds by [deleted] in environment

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I don't know a ton about it either, from the article I gathered that these were self-caught fish as you mentioned, and they mentioned they were freshwater fish, so not from the ocean. More information as to the source of the PFAS contamination and why would have been nice

Freshwater Fish Contain ‘Staggering’ Amount of Toxic PFAS Chemicals, Study Finds by [deleted] in environment

[–]panel30 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know much about this issue. It looks like this is re if you go fishing yourself. Grocery store seafood seems safer re this issue per OP:

In its 2022 survey of seafood, the FDA found much lower levels of PFAS in seafood from grocery stores. The median levels of total PFAS detected by the EPA were 280 times higher than levels in commercially sold fish tested by the FDA.

Deadly Waters by jet199 in environment

[–]Hoomsns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is what I have been seeing coming for a while..

The Exxon Valdez oil spill, then the British petroleum spill, then this.. and I don't know about there are many other environmental disasters.

One day, we will find that we fkd with mother nature too much and her oceans will become a chemical wasteland and all sea life is dying and can't be eaten because everything in the ocean is toxic

Maybe it is already too late and that is why they are trying to kill us with the vaccines.