Conclusions: The presented material shows that despite the fact that the majority of publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for our planet due to the anthropogenic increase in CO2 and its impact on Earth's climate, the shown facts raise serious doubts about this influence.

submitted by Questionable from sciencedirect.com

all 2 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]ShoahKahn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

=== "CLIMATE CHANGE" (erst. "GLOBAL WARMING") DEBOONK ===

"97% of scientists agree on man-made climate change":

  • claim derived from ~12,000 papers on "climate change"
  • 7,930 had no position on the subject
  • 3,896 claimed humans contribute to "climate change" (extend of "contribution" n/a)
  • 78 said humans did not contribute to "climate change"
  • 40 were inconclusive
  • the total (7,930 + 78) 8,008 papers which did not explicitly support the narrative, were disregarded
  • ∴ 12,000 - 8,008 = 3,992 -> 3,896 ÷ 3,992 (100) = "97%"

"CO2 causes climate change":

  • CO2 as a component of total Earth atmosphere: 0.04% (400ppm)
  • total human contribution to the atmospheric CO2 since the Industrial Revolution: 3%
  • human contribution to CO2 increase as a component to total atmospheric gas: 0.0012% (i.e., 3% of 4%)
  • Conclusion: For "man-made climate change" to be believed, one must accept that a change of 0.0012% in a carbon dioxide, over the span of 150+ years, makes significant change to the Earth's atmosphere.

For more deboonks, see here: https://realclimatescience.com/

Food for thought: https://youtu.be/lvvBp25eh0U

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I read about 3 pages. That look like a good, no nonsense treatise on the impacts of various factors on climate. I saved the treatise to read in full later.