TIL a Jewish Actor got a Black person fired, which resulted in another Jew being hired (but Wikipedia claims they're "White").

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

I was reading in the news about a famous actor who just passed away (Arleen Sorkin). She had a notable role on the old Batman cartoons.

But while I was looking up her early life, not only did I learn she was Jewish, but during the 1990s she was replaced from another show by a Black person. She turned this into a nearly half a million dollar lawsuit. The Black guy got sacked but here's the kicker, the replacement was another Jew. But Wikipedia wants you to believe they're white.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arleen_Sorkin#Career

From 1987 to 1989, Sorkin played Geneva, a sexy maid to yuppie couple Richard and Linda Phillips, on the Fox dramedy series Duet. She would reprise this role on one episode of Open House, the sequel series to Duet. She was the original female co-host on America's Funniest People in 1990. In 1992, Sorkin was dismissed from America's Funniest People by producer Vin Di Bona. In response, Sorkin filed a lawsuit against Di Bona, claiming she was dismissed from the show due to her race, after ABC Chairman Dan Burke had suggested to Di Bona that Sorkin be replaced by an African-American or a person of another ethnic minority. Sorkin sought $450,000 for lost earnings, and an additional unspecified amount for harm to her professional reputation and emotional injury. She additionally claimed that after she denounced the move as being racially motivated, Di Bona changed plans and hired new cohost Tawny Kitaen, who was also white.[5]

Go look up Tawny Kitaen's early life and you'll learn she too was Jewish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawny_Kitaen#Early_life

She was born Julie Kitaen in San Diego, California in 1961, the eldest of three children born to Linda Kitaen (née Taylor), a housewife and one-time beauty pageant participant, and Terry Kitaen, an employee of a neon sign company.[1][2] Kitaen's mother was of Scottish and Irish descent, while her father was of Russian-Jewish heritage.[3] Kitaen was raised in the Jewish faith.[4][5]

Now I know what you're thinking. Why is this a big deal when affirmative action got overturned?

Well first of all, it's the obvious double standards. The Women may have died, yet you don't see the media attempting to bring this story up since it covers an important subject (affirmative action). And the second reason, is even though they scrapped the Black person, the replacement was still another Jewish person which looks extremely disproportionate (only 1% of the population). Yet the writing on Wikipedia made it look like it was Whites getting favorable treatment.

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (21 children)

jews are white

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So why are they always attacking White people but then quickly switch to being Jewish again?

https://i.imgur.com/URKLOYx.jpg

[–]Adrift 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

For the same reason a ton of ordinary people are now claiming to be non-hetero or mentally unstable. It's popular to be a victim or in a minority and unpopular to be part of the majority. People are often wrong about the things they claim about themselves.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

But gay people don't pretend to be straight or claim authority over them.

Jews claim to be White just to undermine them at every corner while tossing support towards their own kind (i.e Israel).

In any other scenario that would be known as shapeshifting or a parasite.

People are often wrong about the things they claim about themselves.

Yes, they're wrong about claiming to White.

[–]Adrift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Some gay people absolutely do claim authority over straight people.

Some Jews may act in the manner you suggest. There are plenty of Jews who are not interested in undermining non-Jews. There are plenty of Jews who despise Israel. Regardless, most Jews are white, no matter what some Jews may say or how some Jews may behave. In fact, most Jews are white even if they all said the were not. They're not wrong about claiming to be white, unless you're claiming that the word "White" (and yes, I've noticed the capitalization) only applies to non-Jewish Anglo-Saxons or some such. Using common words like "white" in peculiar ways is cultic behavior.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Some gay people absolutely do claim authority over straight people.

Proof? And for what purpose?

Some Jews may act in the manner you suggest. There are plenty of Jews who are not interested in undermining non-Jews. There are plenty of Jews who despise Israel. Regardless, most Jews are white, no matter what some Jews may say or how some Jews may behave. In fact, most Jews are white even if they all said the were not. They're not wrong about claiming to be white, unless you're claiming that the word "White" (and yes, I've noticed the capitalization) only applies to non-Jewish Anglo-Saxons or some such. Using common words like "white" in peculiar ways is cultic behavior.

You just have to look at politics to see this is not the case. In fact, the strongest arguments comes from Jews having a disproportionate representation in social activism. From Feminism, to Joe Biden's cabinet, to the Supreme Court, Jews have a leading role in changing White culture as opposed to trying to preserve.

You also talk about Jews who despise Israel. Once again, by the numbers we always see bipartisan (both parties) support for Israel. The ones who are against it are always in the extreme minority.

https://jewishinsider.com/2023/05/republicans-democrats-israel-delegation-u-s-judicial-reform/

[–]Adrift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Proof? And for what purpose?

The legalization of "gay" marriage. Marriage is an institution that was intended to act as a foundation for a family. The gay rights movement claimed authority over this institution and subverted it's telos, which was a spiritual vow between two people who were committed to a properly ordered sexual relationship so that they may produce children. If you read the literature of gay rights activists, the purpose for this subversion is to up-end all social norms, which they see as manufactured constructs to keep the elite in places of power and control.

You've made a number of unstated assertions. First you're asserting that all social activism undermines non-Jews. I don't think you can support that claim. Second, there is no such thing as "White culture." The only thing that "White" people share is a relatively similar phenotype whose borders are impossible to define. And those people come from a massive range of cultures, some of which have seen extreme conflicts and rivalries between one another. Third, none of the things you mentioned (feminism, the Supreme Court, Joe Biden's cabinet) are categorically Jewish. Fourth, no culture has ever been preserved. It is the nature of human societies and cultures to change. More often than not these changes are cyclical. There is nothing new under the sun. Finally, even if true, the suggestion that Jews have a disproportionate representation in social activism does not inversely suggest that all Jews are then acting to undermine all non-Jews. You simply can't get from one to the other. It's trivial to point out that that is not the case. Jews are not a monolith. They hold a wide range of views, some in direct conflict with others.

Your final sentence and linked article is a non sequitur. You're again making unstated assertions. This time, presumably, that the Democrat lawmakers in the article = all Jews. And then a further unstated assertion that if Democrat lawmakers = all Jews, and these lawmakers show bipartisan support with Republicans for Israel, then that means that all Jews actually do support Israel. But none of that can be taken from your link. Democrat lawmakers are not universally Jewish. Not even a majority of them are Jewish. And not all Jews are universally Democrat lawmakers. They're not even all Democrats. And nothing in this article suggests anything about Jews or Democrat lawmakers liking or disliking Israel. What the article does suggest is that criticism of Israel mostly comes from Democrat lawmakers.

I know something about cults because I was raised in one and escaped it years ago. I can tell you're in a cult because you don't critically think about the things you write. You assume that certain precepts naturally go together because....of course they go together. If you really thought about why you think about the things you're writing, you would see that they're all very simplistic and silly.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The legalization of "gay" marriage. Marriage is an institution that was intended to act as a foundation for a family. The gay rights movement claimed authority over this institution and subverted it's telos, which was a spiritual vow between two people who were committed to a properly ordered sexual relationship so that they may produce children. If you read the literature of gay rights activists, the purpose for this subversion is to up-end all social norms, which they see as manufactured constructs to keep the elite in places of power and control.

Did Gay Marriage stop straight people from having kids? Whether legally or not? Nope.

You've made a number of unstated assertions. First you're asserting that all social activism undermines non-Jews. I don't think you can support that claim.

Compare European countries today vs half a century ago.

You think stuff like the George Floyd riots and the billions of property damage is what White societies were asking for? Or not letting the police actually do their job and arrest delinquents?

But I can see this argument is going to nowhere with you when you beleive this:

The only thing that "White" people share is a relatively similar phenotype whose borders are impossible to define.

White people share a culture that is traditionally at the 100 IQ level. They've built civilizations that were moderately safe, financially wealthy and technology the most advance.

You don't get this when you replace indigenous European people with that of indigenous Africans or Indians.

I could also answer the other points later (if I feel like I'm not wasting my time).

I know something about cults because I was raised in one and escaped it years ago. I can tell you're in a cult because you don't critically think about the things you write. You assume that certain precepts naturally go together because....of course they go together. If you really thought about why you think about the things you're writing, you would see that they're all very simplistic and silly.

Do you agree or disagree that Humans are biological creatures? Do you think Humans are the only species exempt from the rules of evolution and natural selection?

There is nothing wrong in looking for patterns and group behavior in animals. Especially as it's an easy predictor of knowing how they survived for millennia.

When people deny that White culture doesn't exist, I ask them to go look at what many other non-White societies looked like before they ever made contact with them. You wont find railroads or electricity in Africa before it was introduced by Europeans. Similarly, the Americas never had Two Story buildings or even a government we traditionally now know as Democracy before European Settlers arrived and built those things.

None of which is opinion.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    cope harder dummy

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      so . . . white.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Anything to prevent yourself from being the same as a jew, eh?

        [–][deleted]  (3 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          that's a lot of words for me to not care about. jews are white. look at 'em, it's not fuckin complicated

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]

            [–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Yes, if they are self-hating, which all Democrats must be by definition XD