Do you think that Al-Qaeda really did 9/11?

submitted by 8thmonitor from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AlphixNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, the plane explanation makes no sense at all. Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel beams; the buildings were designed to withstand multiple airliner impacts; the buildings fell into their own footprint at freefall speeds: there was no resistance on the way down! Plus, many people at the scene reported SECONDARY EXPLOSIONS, one by floor: "boom-boom-boom-boom-boom" etc. They did not make that up.

Also, WTC 7 came down after a couple broken windows and a tiny fire. "Lucky" Larry said, "we decided to pull it" and it came down within a couple hours of him saying that, when in fact controlled demolitions are planned and executed over WEEKS of installing the charges, etc. So he says "we decided to pull it" (down), it comes down in a couple hours, in EXACTLY the same pattern as 1 & 2 and THAT IS NOT SUSPICIOUS? Oh, and Building 7 contained SEC records for many high profile trading fraud cases. Funny how that works.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Those floor-to-floor explosions were the individual collapsing as the upper levels landed on them. It was air blowing out as each was smashed flat.

[–]AlphixNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If that had been the case, the tower would not have fallen at free-fall speeds. Try again.