you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FThumb 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Naming the jew isn't being a dick.

Bigotry against a race or religion, as if they're a monolith, is the very definition of bigotry. Being an open and proud bigot is absolutely being a dick.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Bigotry against a race or religion, as if they're a monolith, is the very definition of bigotry

No it isn't. You should look up the definition of bigotry. Being against jewish supremacy is not "bigotry". It is anti-bigotry. They are not better than anyone else.

How will forcing every race and ethnicity to have fair representation in positions of power "single out jews and give a pass to the others"? I want jews to be treated like everyone else is treated. YOU are opposed to that because you're a jew lover who supports their racist jewish supremacy.

?

[–]FThumb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You should look up the definition of bigotry

I did:

bigotry noun [ U ] us /ˈbɪɡ·ə·tri/

strong, unreasonable ideas, esp. about race or religion: racial/religious bigotry

I'm pretty sure wanting to eliminate Jews because they're disproportionately represented in financial eliete circles qualifies as both "unreasonable" and "especially about race or religion."

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bigotry: "obstinate or unreasonable" attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction, in particular prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.

The quoted section is new-think... "Strong attachment" was/is the legitimate definition. But are you not bigoted against child rapists, as a particular group?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

strong, unreasonable ideas, esp. about race or religion: racial/religious bigotry

That's some new redefinition of the word. This is not what bigotry is.

I'm pretty sure wanting to eliminate Jews because they're disproportionately represented in financial eliete circles qualifies as both "unreasonable" and "especially about race or religion."

Quote me saying I want that.
Don't be dishonest.

[–]FThumb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That's some new redefinition of the word.

So show me another definition then.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own.

[–]FThumb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And where are you getting that definition from?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–]FThumb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And from your link to "bigotry" it directs us to its definition of "bigot:"

a person who is intolerant or hateful toward people whose race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc., is different from the person's own.

You're a bigot.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are a bigot too then, considering your intolerance of me.