you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Logical fallacy. From your perspective, whites do exist, and hence if they didn't exist, white privilege couldn't be a thing.
From their perspective, whites do not exist, and hence white privilege is problematic, because while whites don't exist, people treat others as if whites DID exist which grants those people, that are classified as white by society, special privileges.

Obviously this is false, whites are "privileged" (read: better) through biology, but are socially being persecuted and oppressed by the state and society in general. By denying our superior biology, they artificially create a social vacuum of inequality that justifies their antiwhite discrimination.

[–]TrabWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

From their perspective, whites do not exist, and hence white privilege is problematic

This is exactly the point though, who are the benefactors of "White Privilege" if Whites don't exist?

You don't need to spend time explaining to them Whites exist, make them explain their views on the contradictions they hold on race

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is exactly the point though, who are the benefactors of "White Privilege" if Whites don't exist?

Those who are PERCEIVED to be white due to their white skin color, but are not white, because race is not real.

[–]TrabWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And who are these people "perceived" to be White?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those with white skin and those who are white passing.