Christians, especially Evangelicals, much more philosemitic than atheists. So much for muh based christian nationalism.

submitted by Idoloboretz from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AlphixNational Socialist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

You have to go to church in order to be a Christian? I didn't know this. What I do know is that organized religions are easy to subvert and turn into shit.

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ironic coming from a natsoc.

[–]AlphixNational Socialist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The ideal of purity is always antithetical to subversion, what's ironic about this?

[–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing, he is just being a jew

[–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Natsocs usually see much value in organized religion and power/cultural structures in general.

[–]AlphixNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your interpretation is skewed, the purity ideal can be manifest in any structure that is coherent with its purported founding principle. Those are the structures that are worthwhile. But any organized religion can be subverted, just like any other structure or organization, and that's where the line is drawn. In short: organized "Christianity" is most certainly not faithful to its founding principle. As such, it is impure and not worthy of approval.