How would you respond to an anti White saying European colonialism and imperialism justifies White replacement?

submitted by Nasser from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How would you respond to an anti White saying European colonialism and imperialism justifies White replacement?

By reminding them that where plenty of White groups/countries throughout history who were never involved in that stuff, yet the genocidal logic of replacing them still persists.

Iceland never had slaves or went to Africa as far as I'm aware. The same is true with Denmark, Sweden and Norway.

Amish people living in the Americas were terrorized for their vocal resistance against fighting foreign wars.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2001-10-21-0110210182-story.html

Yet do we see anyone advocating to spare these people despite being white? Nope. The anti-white agenda is all the same.

Edit: Not to mention, the idea of replacing an entire race looks hypocritical, since there was obviously Black Imperialists, Asian Imperialists, Hispanic Imperialists in history as well. If Whites are seen as the problem, then every other group who invaded countries or held slaves are just as guilty. The Native Indians for example like to bitch that they own the continent, yet it's often forgotten how they wiped out entire tribes who existed before them or even used them for human sacrificing ceremonies.

https://www.science.org/content/article/feeding-gods-hundreds-skulls-reveal-massive-scale-human-sacrifice-aztec-capital