you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is a frequent argument I see them make. What is the best counter or rebuttal to it?

Tell them to go back to Mexico.

They deliberately crossed into another country that's full of White people, but then bitch that they're not being treated like one. So why the hell did they move there in the first place?

But of course, they know the truth. It's better to live "oppressed" under Whites, than to be "free" in a Brown one.

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The issue with the go back to the go back to argument in relation to central and southern americans is that they can pull the Whites replaces the Natives card as well as point out how the US Government/CIA crusade against communism in those regions during the cold war lead to destabilization and the poverty forcing these types to want to migrate to the US.

[–]saiditkang 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So by that logic Arabs from countries like Iraq, Syria and Libya should be able to immigrate to Israel because Israel fucked their countries up. Do you think they should be able to flood Israel in order to make up for what Neocons/zionists did to their home countries?

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, I do not believe that, just highlighting an argument they commonly use.