If you could repeal just one law/act/amendment today, what would it be and why?

submitted by curious2 from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Jews have genocided dozens of peoples throughout history, it's what they've been doing for thousands of years. 99% of them have had nothing to do with feminism and equality, these things are just particular symptoms of jews being in power.

When you are fighting a war is it preferable to kill the commanders, generals and other leaders or to wipeout specific units you personally have some prejudice against because you don't like X type of equipment, tactic etc? Obviously chasing units you personally don't like is retarded and it'll always be best to kill the people responsible for organising the army. 'Cavalry is gay, chase the horses guys' vs 'Try to get Alexander, he's the greatest general the world has ever known', I know who I'd listen to.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jews have genocided dozens of peoples throughout history, it's what they've been doing for thousands of years.

Why should I believe that the Founding Fathers of the U.S would have been so incompetent, that a small Jewish population would have overthrown their country and proceed to wipe them out without resistance?

May I remind you that the Founding Demographics had beat the British Empire, fought and beat the Ottomans (who were enslaving Americans by the way), expanded their own territory through either conquest or tactical purchases (i.e Louisiana/Alaska) and they designed a political system that gave Americans the right to bear arms and limit the power of the President from being too tyrannical?

Context is important, otherwise, you're acting like the U.S was always some feeble colony that could have been controlled by outsiders, but history clearly tells us that was not the case until Isolationism was abandoned, and the U.S began whoring itself to the highest bidder and losing sight of what made them so rich and powerful in the first place.

When you are fighting a war is it preferable to kill the commanders, generals and other leaders or to wipeout specific units you personally have some prejudice against because you don't like X type of equipment, tactic etc? Obviously chasing units you personally don't like is retarded and it'll always be best to kill the people responsible for organising the army. 'Cavalry is gay, chase the horses guys' vs 'Try to get Alexander, he's the greatest general the world has ever known', I know who I'd listen to.

Both can be accomplished. The U.S having a traditional/conservative origin acted like a shield against those "commanders" who were always planning to subvert and destroy the country. For example, you mentioned genocides so why not explain to me why Communism never took root in the U.S, despite it happening in other White countries like Russia and the bloody death toll it caused there? Once again, you can find texts from 50+ years ago of Americans criticizing the movement, because it either went against their religion, capitalist values, or would have spelled the end of their gun rights.