you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Woods is too idealistic and refuses realism in favor of idealism which is informed by his Christian socialist beliefs.

His debate against imperialism was really weak and demonstrated that he understood nothing about military matters or supply chains. His video about fine tuning of the universe and how that proves God is real is really weak as well. For the record, I believe in God as well but his arguments against fine tuning were really weak.

People like Woods and Joel fall into the pitfall of over-intellectualization.

This is an issue with DR intellectualism. Too many philosophy and humanities graduates, blabbering about impractical and abstract concepts while being ignorant of real things like warfare, history, and scientific concepts.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Every "argument" for the existence of God is weak in my opinion. They're pretty much all logical fallacies.

By the way, didn't Joel debate imperialism?