Spot on. What people here are effectively arguing over is whether having more Whites + more non-whites (which, I've noticed, they've effectively reduced to Tyrones only, and completely ignored the Juans and others) is a better position than having less Whites + less non-whites (again, with the emphasis on Tyrones). I obviously land on the side of the former. I don't really care whether there are more Tyrones in shitholes like Atlanta, because to even be White in many of those places is already to be a part of a fringe minority, and because most of those Tyrones cannot easily move and are stuck in their own mess.

There will be no shortage of Africans coming over the next few decades (trust me, they'll be coming by the millions every year to the USA if we look a few decades ahead). What's really the point in taking the option of maintaining the higher fertility of Shaniquas and maintaining the lower fertility of our own people, when we can just take the other option of increasing the fertility of our own people, accept that most Shaniquas are going to remain in select areas even if they'll be slightly more fertile as well, and also accept that Tyrones are going to be replaced by millions of Ngubus, Okechukwus and other more pure blacks regardless of which option America takes? After all, just who is going to stop them from coming to the USA? The Republicans? Who haven't won a popular vote in 34 years and might very well never win a Federal election ever again regardless of what they do? Nope. So who?

Furthermore, there is no future for so-called 'Enslaved Descended African-Americans' as a distinct group anywhere. They'll simply be assimilated into the mass of Nigerians and other people who will soon be by far the main type of immigrant to America, especially since less fertile parts of the world will exceedingly want to keep more of their populations at home, and because mass chaos in Africa is an inevitability. As the Juans are also falling well below replacement level in numerous Latin American countries, it is the Okechukwus who everyone (including, funnily, their distant cousin Tyrone) will hate. Who gives a shit about Tyrone and Shaniqua, or whether Shaniqua instead uses a fucking coat hanger when she decides she actually doesn't want to birth Tyrone Junior? At the moment Juan is a bigger problem than Tyrone, which is why plenty of normies support the Wall with Mexico while practically none would accept one around Tyrone's hood. And Okechukwu is the biggest problem of all of them, well, unless Israhell gets destroyed and a few million more Schlomos come to America: Schlomo is the very worst of all on a per capita level. Meanwhile, Tyrone's grandkids will probably be named 'Goodluck' or 'Muhammadu' or something, since they will be submerged in all things socioculturally African, including their brands of Christianity and Islam.

I have no idea why the DR of all people would make something like the number of Tyrones a wedge issue when reducing the number of Juans in California and in the purple southern states that are flipping to blue is one example of something far more important. All this 'current year' shit (e.g. support for compulsory Covax when people should leave me the fuck alone; partisanship over the Russo-Ukrainian War when both sides are to varying degrees opposed to ethnonationalism; and now Roe v. Wade) is just a useless distraction that in hindsight everyone will agree was a waste of time arguing over. Nobody cares about 'current year' shit retrospectively. Or else we'd still be making threads about the 2020 election, whether Zemmour is good or bad, and other things that have conclusively passed.