you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nombre27 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Found this observation interesting,

https://old.reddit.com/r/SocialJusticeInAction/comments/u0w955/thoughts/

Re: the timeline of identity development

Basically children before a certain age are more vulnerable to these fucked up suggestions, and by delaying these disgusting people from putting their disgusting thoughts in the heads of children, the children will be more likely to reject them. Ideally we'd have a Platonic school where any such corrupting information was not allowed to be transmitted to children.

Having to resort to brainwashing children from a young age says a lot about how blank slatism is bullshit, as they're essentially admitting that without intervention during a vulnerable period the default developmental pathway is to reject their filthy ideology.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I have children of my own and they both had a clear understanding of boy vs girl by age 3, but I wonder what would happen if they had parents and teachers telling them fag theory.

[–]Nombre27 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's the point I failed to communicate.

Children are impressionable and typically obey/trust authority. This is why the grooming stuff is so malicious.

These people are metaphysically evil.

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”

  • C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

How is it compatible with theories that they are "born this way", and that most of these people grew up without many LGBT role models? I hear a lot about how this meme is just trying to harm LGBT kids and leave the next generation without queer elders.

[–]Nombre27 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How is it compatible with theories that they are "born this way", and that most of these people grew up without many LGBT role models?

I never said that most gays are born that way, I was implying the opposite and that indoctrinating children at an early age like they've been doing is probably turn the kids gay.

I hear a lot about how this meme is just trying to harm LGBT kids and leave the next generation without queer elders.

How is that supposed to work? By preventing grooming there will be less gays this generation than previously? That kind of just proves the point that these people shouldn't be allowed around children.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, I am just providing the counter point by asking which is more plausible.

[–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Heterosexuality is more plausible because that results in biological propagation. It's been selected for.

This seems quite obvious to me, do you think that is up for dispute? (not being hostile just curious what your devil's advocate position is based on)

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well I don't know the specifics of that yet, but they do account for homosexuals/transgenders also being born the way they are.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

LGBT role models shouldn't exist in my opinion. Fags should be shamed back into the closet like they were just a few decades ago. Why would we want our children to have freaks as role models?

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well its up to you. I was solely referring to how they did not have role models back in the day.