There's a massive difference between conspiracy stuff and these examples you gave, they occupy opposite logical positions. Holocaust affirmation relies on conspiratorial thinking, in fact it's the most egregious example of it, whereas holocaust denial relies on rational thinking. Same with race denial again relies on conspiratorial thinking, same with white privilege etc. I am consistent in rejecting all of these obvious lies/delusions and only thinking rationally about all these matters, as i do with conspiracies.

If those things you mentioned were argued the same way people argue for conspiracies then I wouldn't be here indeed, but they're not because they're distinguished from conspiracies. Of course some low iq, schizo etc people end up talking about jews and shit but it's very easy to see the difference.

The reason our sub was popular is because we attracted smart guys who formulated arguments well.

we weren't posting comments

that look like this

and we werent RANDOM CAPSLOCKING

and other schizo/retard looking shit

We had narratives that were better than everyone else's, our narratives explained the past and predicted the future better than anyone else, our soyenceheads debunked race stuff with fax and logik for the spergs. We had pretty much 0 reliance on anything to do with speculation and saying things were fake and whatever else conspiracy guys get up to.