New ADL yearly crime report gayop just dropped

submitted by MarkimusNational Socialist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There's a website called sgtreport that has a section where he goes through real conspiracies and disinformation conspiracies. I agree with most of his points in that section.

If they're competent enough to somehow fake the death of 50 people they're going to be competent enough to not fuck up a bunch of basic details in video editing that low IQ schizophrenics easily pick up on, clearly those inconsistencies are due to bad internet infrastructure in Aus/NZ which is well known, along with recording on his gay little bugman device.

That's true and my current position is that the shooting was real. I'm also aware of the constant fake conspiracy pushing to dilute the information and hide what's really going on. That being said I've noticed you have a tendency to just out right reject anything that smells like conspiracy at all without hearing out the argument. You're not the only person in our movement that does that. I notice it from guys like Spencer and Mark Brahmin. They almost have a conspiracy allergy. You have to beat them over the head with facts before they start exploring the hypothesis. All I know is they that multiple CIA directors and influential globalists have repeatedly said their goal is to make sure the public is living in a false reality on all fronts. That means as dissidents we can't get comfy and just accept the common explanation for anything. Everything needs to go back to first principles and be examined in detail. If something is true it will survive critical analysis. If the New Zealand shooting was real it would easily survive critical analysis. Unfortunately with many of these events (Las Vegas for example) the media seems hellbent on stuffing it down the memory hole. That drive me to research and analyze in more detail. You and I really wouldn't be here if it weren't for 'low IQ schizophrenic autists' hadn't re-analyzed the holocaust, race matters, 9/11, Jews, etc.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's a massive difference between conspiracy stuff and these examples you gave, they occupy opposite logical positions. Holocaust affirmation relies on conspiratorial thinking, in fact it's the most egregious example of it, whereas holocaust denial relies on rational thinking. Same with race denial again relies on conspiratorial thinking, same with white privilege etc. I am consistent in rejecting all of these obvious lies/delusions and only thinking rationally about all these matters, as i do with conspiracies.

If those things you mentioned were argued the same way people argue for conspiracies then I wouldn't be here indeed, but they're not because they're distinguished from conspiracies. Of course some low iq, schizo etc people end up talking about jews and shit but it's very easy to see the difference.

The reason our sub was popular is because we attracted smart guys who formulated arguments well.

we weren't posting comments

that look like this

and we werent RANDOM CAPSLOCKING

and other schizo/retard looking shit

We had narratives that were better than everyone else's, our narratives explained the past and predicted the future better than anyone else, our soyenceheads debunked race stuff with fax and logik for the spergs. We had pretty much 0 reliance on anything to do with speculation and saying things were fake and whatever else conspiracy guys get up to.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All good points.