Keith Woods: "Are people still going to call Tucker a gatekeeper and a net negative now that he's calling out the great replacement on Fox?"

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"The Dems want to demographically replace heritage Americans white and black. We are the party of the multiracial working class"

This is the direction they're going in rhetorically and I don't see why it would have any contradictions with raceblind liberalism, if anything they're accusing the left of betraying this premise and they are the true upholders of it.

Another side note is that there is obviously black anxiety about demographic replacement also concerning hispanics, which is what has been feeding a lot of their chimpouts in recent years. They sense that they're losing some status due to the massive amounts of immigration just the same as white people are. Tariq Nasheed even tweeted pretty much exactly this the other day, it's something I've been noticing and thinking about for a couple years now.

[–]NeoRail 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think just mentioning the demographic issue is already a momentous change and in my opinion, it does not really matter what they may or may not intend with this. The results will be quite clear. American blacks vote something like 90% Democrat. Hispanics are similar. This type of rhetoric will almost exclusively affect white Republican voters. There is also the matter of how white Americans will pro-actively make their own interpretations of what this demographic rhetoric means for them. The important thing here is not the exact position the establishment conservatives are taking on this issue, but rather that they are talking about it, bringing it to the attention of their voters and legitimising it at all.