you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

you disingenuous prick.

Why go to the trouble of writing this while making insulting comments? Are you not confident in what you write? Do you know the definition of 'disingenuous'? Do you really want to lower the discourse while you make your arguments? Do you think anyone will take you seriously when you do this? (No, they won't.)

It amazes me the lengths to which people will go to try to justify the recent rise in "scientific" racism. I see that they are very serious about it and have a substantial, which is doubly worrying. Comments like these help me learn about the resurgence of interests in eugenics (but at the cost of dealing with insults from insecure people). Individual concerns about marrying only within one's ethnic or local group date back millenia, for many ethnicities. That's a social and family development, and not scientiic. My concern is that recent racists want to claim that they use science for their arguments, based on two essays. But scientific evidence shows that this leads to inbreeding and serious social problems, and there are numerous examples of this. The other problem is that those who favor the resurgence of eugenics are now primarily arguing for the hatred and removal of (or distancing of) the 'other' - to breed a better race - rather than for 'science' and 'humanity', both of which support the opposite approaches to the 'other', that the mixing of people has made them smarter, more resiliant, and more attractive (and I know many on DAR who will vociferously argue against these last three words, and thus have differing views on the two essays by two so-called academics that try to argue against this, when almost all other academics refute these claims, on scientific bases).

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why go to the trouble of writing this while making insulting comments? Are you not confident in what you write? Do you know the definition of 'disingenuous'? Do you really want to lower the discourse while you make your arguments? Do you think anyone will take you seriously when you do this? (No, they won't.)

Of course that's the only thing in my reply you're focusing on, instead of focusing on the actual substance of it, because you can't come up with any rational arguments of your own. This is tone policing by the way, and thus a Rule 2 violation on this sub, considering you yourself are all about people following the rules. Me throwing insults in at you in my reply has nothing to do with confidence, I do this because pathological liars and sophists like you require this in order for the arguments to get through your head, since you clearly aren't responisive to logic and reason on its own.

Judging by the amount of likes my reply verus your reply has gotten so far, I'm clearly the one that's being taken more seriously than you here, and almost any white person who has ever had biology classes (except for a small minority of brainwashed woke anti-white Reddit freaks like you) would definitely take my side regarding eugenics when presented both of our sets of arguments, as any sane person who has any grasp of evolution would simply have to lie to himsels to deny that I'm right on this.

And yes, "disingenuous" is actually a perfect description for someone who falsely claims that there's a risk of inbreeding depression with a population of millions of people just because some pathological traits have been removed from it, whereas in reality all scientific evidence suggests inbreeding depression can only occur without any deliberate actions of incest in very small, isolated populations of a couple of thousand people or less.

.

It amazes me the lengths to which people will go to try to justify the recent rise in "scientific" racism. I see that they are very serious about it and have a substantial, which is doubly worrying. Comments like these help me learn about the resurgence of interests in eugenics (but at the cost of dealing with insults from insecure people).

That was a long-winded way of telling us we're living in your minds rent-free. We were already aware of the fact that the alt-right lives in everyone's minds rent-free nowadays, even more so in the minds of woke anti-white leftists and shitlibs like you, but thanks for the additional confirmation. Keep coping and seething. ;)

.

The other problem is that those who favor the resurgence of eugenics are now primarily arguing for the hatred and removal of (or distancing of) the 'other' - to breed a better race - rather than for 'science' and 'humanity'

My support for eugenics has never been about hatred, or at least not primarily, it's about improving the white race, and by extension humanity as a whole, and about creating a safer, more prosperous and more socially cohesive future for my people and humanity in general. If you've actually paid any attention to my statements (including my previous reply to you) on eugenics from the past couple of years, you'd have known that I regularly talk about how I'm of the opinion that those who shouldn't be allowed to reproduce (the dumb, the weak, the ugly, the disabled, the mentally ill, etc.) should still be taken care of by the government, should still retain most of their other rights and freedoms (except for the right to vote and actively participate in politics), and should still be treated with respect by the rest of society. I do hate anti-whites (regardless of whether they're white themselves, Jewish or non-white) with a burning passion though, and they are obviously among the first who should be considered for forced sterilization under any eugenics policy.

PS: Furthermore, anti-eugenicists (like you) are on the same level of either delusional insanity or pathological lying for political purposes as flat earthers, young earth creationists and people who unironically claim 2 + 2 = 5, the only difference being that your lie/delusion is currently backed with money, propaganda, censorship and violence by the ruling elites, whereas the other lies/delusions aren't. So I sincerely hope that one day, once we've managed to remove the current elites, and your pro-dysgenics/anti-eugenics (bioleninist) shilling doesn't have any institutional support anymore, we can just simply neuter you, put you away in an insane asylum together with the other woke Reddit freaks, and be done with it, for the betterment of the rest of society.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course that's the only thing in my reply you're focusing on

Did you read the rest of my response?

it's about improving the white race, and by extension humanity as a whole, and about creating a safer, more prosperous and more socially cohesive future for my people and humanity in general.

Read about other attempts to do this with other groups of people and why it didn't work very well. Also search for: Steven Pinker Ashkenazim . He's wrong on many levels, but because the news media and many academic institutions are controlled by Ashkenazim, they're not going to challenge themselves to think about how wrong they are. Here they are crying over spilt milk: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/05/14/bret-stephens-new-york-times-outrage-backlash-256494

[–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But scientific evidence shows that this leads to inbreeding and serious social problems, and there are numerous examples of this.

Eugenics is against inbreeding. Inbreeding is usually caused by cousin marriage in real world populations and has nothing to do with eugenics outside some retarded strawman you've probably concocted in your head.

that the mixing of people has made them smarter, more resiliant, and more attractive

Did it? Funny all the mixed people I live near are uglier, stupider, and more impulsively violent than their unfortunate monoracial ancestors. I guess their IQ scores, crime statistics, and mirrors are lying about it though. I can't think of a single result of mixing European and other racial/ethnic groups where the average was an improvement.

Here's a liberal science devotee saying the obvious though https://twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/1228943686953664512?lang=en