you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Spain discovered massive gold and silver mines in Peru and Mexico during their conquest. They brought massive amounts of it to Europe as well. It didn't make them fabulously rich, it just created inflation. The Spanish peasants and elites didn't grow richer. In fact, in terms of economic affluence, they languished far behind their English, Dutch, and French counterparts.

Those countries had no such gold reserve but they produced more wealth i.e goods and services. They had more economic activity and produced more food, finished products, luxury goods, and raw materials. Thus they were wealthiers.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There was a guy named Adam Smith who wrote a book about this. It's called "The Wealth of Nations". It turns out gold does not create wealth, but rather skilled labor and industrial capacity.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yup. Having real stuff is wealth. If gold was what mattered then the incas were richer than China.