China bans feminine men from TV

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

I just don't know if there should be an establishment mouthpiece here. I wish D3rr would do something about obvious trolls.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

I wish /u/d3rr would at least ban him for a week for perpetually dragging down conversations, name-calling, other obvious and repetitive rule breaking, and generally creating chaos.

I admit I'm creating chaos occasionally - but only with one single user, who happens to be pushing chaos everywhere with everyone all the time.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

he got a strike for rule breaking the other day. shit is being handled.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I can't wait for the next two strikes.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

7 hours ago you said this:

Alright then. Let's call a truce, be respectful of each other, Jimmy, and the Squad - and let's discuss the OP video.

I finally offered a long review of your video. I've also not dragged down the discussions.

4 hours ago you requested this:

I wish /d3rr would at least ban him

(I am just noting this for the record. Perhaps I misunderstood your comment about "a truce, [&] be respectful of each other.")

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

He called you gay the other day

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah, I really only lash out at two or three users, who seem to annoy just about everybody.

I disagree with others and try really hard not to do the same with them because they are mostly honest in their dealings. Socks has never been honest, that account backpeddles so often.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Me too. I ignore the other 2 who are at least consistent in their limitations - and less prolifically invasive.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

They also usually comment less.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, much less prolific.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I totally misread what you wrote at the end. You basically said that, Sorry, ha