Is a high IQ required to break the taboo on White replacement?

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Japan...increase in bicycle accidents....

Ok, this is epic. Next time I vote for a head of state, I have to tell them the #1 pressing concern in any society, are the amount of bikes on the road.

Being serious now, these complaints have absolutely nothing to do with the success of an ethnostate. In fact, take everything you've written down and multiply them by three. Because when you introduce diversity, you are forced to now deal with many ethnic groups and their issues as opposed to just helping one.

In Japanese society, women's issues are their own. The government is only tasked to look after the Japanese population. If they were multicultural, then now the government has to spend billions setting up departments for White citizens, Black citizens, Indian citizens, because all of them will never have equal social status. These indifferences are made worse by biological factors that no amount of money can fix.

Multiculturalism and diversity are literally money sinks. It's fruitless to spend so much money trying to make every single race and ethnic group happy, when we would all be better off focusing on just one group for every country.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

We certainly disagree. I still argue that it's important to look at the broader significant circumstances of the problems in Japan and Israel. These aren't by any means the shining examples of the awesomeness of ethnostates. At best, they also have the same problems as other countries. At worst, their distinctive problems are essentially abuses to themselves and others.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't disagree. There's a crucial element that proves multiculturalism is heavily immoral. Read this line again,

In fact, take everything you've written down and multiply them by three. Because when you introduce diversity, you are forced to now deal with many ethnic groups and their issues as opposed to just helping one.

Multiculturalism literally costs money. It's not cheap and it was never affordable. In America alone, we've seen race riots since the country was founded, all the way to 2020 today.

Japan NEVER had that. Only in multicultural societies, does racial violence exist. Only in multicultural societies, does racism exist. Racism can only exist because diversity enabled it.