you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nombre27 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

They weren't mostly white.

Page 18, table 1

Hispanic 112
Not Hispanic 561
White 320
Black 43
Asian 8
Mixed race 111
Declined/Unknown 191

[–]CircumsteinRabbi Circumstein 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's the Guardian article itself which claims that they're "mostly white". If the study itself says otherwise, then it's just another of many examples of that particular piece of shit website being faux news. However, if Hispanic is stupidly included as White, as if an Asiatic offshoot is totally the same as the descendants of the people who survived the Ice Age, then it's the study itself at which the fault originates. I bet MENAs are included in White rather than in the mixed sample or the already abysmally small Asian sample, as well. Hard to believe the number of Asian+MENA would be a measly 8 given the overall sample size.

Given how we're looking at an overwhelmingly non-white selection (and no more than 8 who could be East Asian)... are we just looking at the effects of a "majority-minority" demographic misinterpreted as the results of the "new normal"? Of course, 78 seems abysmally low, lower than the global average IQ, lower than the "African-American" average IQ, etc. Our intended replacements are... a generation of idiocratic Covidiot rocket surgeons!? Is Idiocracy... the Great Reset?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

However, if Hispanic is stupidly included as White

Hispanics value light skin culturally and they often identify as white. In Houston the white percentage shrinks from ~70% to ~30% if you exclude Hispanics who identify as white.

I understand the issue with that, but it's a lot more desirable than the alternative, it's a sign of assimilation. If they strongly clung to their identity we'd be recreating a Mexican shithole here.

[–]Bagarmoossen[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

There is no reason to think that those who declined to answer have a different racial makeup than those who answered the question.

The amount of mixed race children is truly staggering though.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted]  (4 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        Yep.

        It's disgustingly evil.

        I think this is something we need to push harder. If you deliberately manipulate statistics and research you aren't just being tricky. You are literally evil; especially so if you have a large platform. This is an orchestrated effort to warp peoples reality. Do not forget that these people want you broke, dead, your kids raped and brainwashed and they think it's funny.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          [–]Yin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          How many "White" were hispanic?

          [–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Well if 191 declined to answer but 112 were Hispanic, then they must have volunteered that information, so I would think it's safe to assume they got put into the White category, which would now be 208, and then the declined/unknown would actually be 79, if that assumption holds.