White Supremacy: What is actually wrong with supporting it?

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

White supremacy means oppressing every other ethnic group, to the point of violence

If a child outscores his entire class in Math, does that make him violent or oppressive?

If a child beats his entire class in Basketball, does that make him violent?

If a girl wins a beauty pageant, does that make her violent?

In every scenario, it is possible to acknowledge supremacy without juxtaposing it as being some kind of violent extremist.

In fact, in every category that I posted that White people dominate in, NONE of it has anything to with violence in any kind.

Science & Technology? Steve Jobs didn't kill anyone. Beauty and physical looks? No one dies for looking at a White person. White culture and civilizations? African slaves preferred to stay next to Whites instead of go back to Africa, even after their freedom was granted.

Edit: White culture was also responsible for ending slavery globally. Ironically, you look at every non-white Civilization and THEY ALL FOUGHT TO KEEP SLAVES. Native Americans and Black people in particular, captured thousands of slaves for the sole purpose of sacrificing them.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree about all the historical facts you post. My point is, "supremacist" is fairly thoroughly equal to "oppressor" in people's minds. That's the distinction I wish to make. Other than that, we are in agreement.