you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You're right under a very narrow set of circumstances. If it's a VERY small group of immigrants and those immigrants are not used by a power hungry group of wealthy elites to wage war on the homogeneous native population then sure you're correct.

    However...

    Let's say you have a tribe of 1000 people and you import a different tribe of 1000 people to live among them. You also allow the new tribe to practice their customs but the old tribe is shamed and strongly discouraged to envy the new tribe and not to have families any more at all because it's more fun to collect food and supplies for the new tribe members. Also consider all the signs around the encampment encourage the females to breed with the new males. Imagine if all the signs lie about the virility of the new males and anyone that points this out is shamed and gets all his food and status taken away. Finally, a good chunk of the land and resources of the old tribe are given to the new tribe because all things need to be 'equal' and historical 'justice' needs to be met. Maybe you could even give the women of the old tribe all the men's resources and give the men naked picture to look at in their huts to distract them from the rape and pillaging of their lands. Lands their fathers told them must be protected at all costs. When they seek god and family for help you tell them both are dead and obsolete.

    I don't know of any tribe that would survive that process spiritually or genetically. They'd either disappear or become part of the new tribe.

    That's genocide by most definitions.

    Interview related

    https://ruqqus.com/+altrightwebm/post/bjb1/how-to-conquer-an-island

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    The results are the same.

    White people are made a minority. Immigrants [non-whites] become the new majority. The new majority votes to harm the minority population, who is going to stop them? The United Nations? Ha!

    Forcing demographic change has always resulted in an in balance of power and dignity. Look at South Africa. We have 27 years of proof that ending Apartheid was a mistake. Even the Blacks suffered when Blacks ruled over them vs what the White Man did. Shittier economy, less food, and more violence. But the diversity of immigrants made it all worth it right? Nope.

    [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Have you read the definition of genocide? Yes, it does. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide#Intent

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Actually it's a massive weapon used by the CCP against Tibetans and the uighurs. They import large numbers of Han into these areas to dilute their culture and turn previously sovereign or autonomous areas into places where the Han will dominate. If it's genocide when it happens to Tibetans -- most serious observers acknowledge the policies in Tibet are genocidal -- then it's genocide when it's done to us.