you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I call no man master.

It is a shame this degenerate mentality has become associated with the "Right". It is a virtue to be against bad authority, but there is no virtue in being against authority in and of itself. You will always have a "master," if it is not big government, then it will be big business or some other source of power.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know that "master" is a good word for any governing force or entity with power. It indicates subservience in an unhealthy way, one that can't be questioned with critical thought. Big businesses aren't elected, but have seized power through corruption. Most western governments rely on election methods, corrupt methods or not, to place people into seats of decision making. These are people that are also upheld to the same laws that they helped to create, along with any laws before and after their installation. They're elected guardians, not really masters. At least that's how I see it.

[–]thefirststoneThat's my purse! I don't know you! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anarchists might say that, but they mean more by it. Rejecting man as the ultimate authority does not mean to reject legitimate authority or hierarchies in general.