you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Larry Flynt fought several high-profile first amendment legal battles. What some want today, censorship to ban "hate," isn't much different than the old obscenity laws.

There was a movie, The People vs. Larry Flynt about it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The right to publish smut. Yeah, way to go pushing "free speech" to an extreme nobody needs.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's the extremes that need protecting. Nobody cares if you say inoffensive things. And this in turn protects us, theoretically anyways, from being silenced if suddenly what we say is also deemed offensive.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

How's that working out.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It could be better.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As in Fascism: You have the right to say, write, or publish anything that is morally acceptable.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All things serve the beam.