you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Homo sapiens and neanderthals were different species. Why would there even be such a thing as cross-species attraction?

You claimed you already watched the video. Also Neanderthals are sometimes cited as a subspecies since they were capable of producing fertile offspring with H. sapiens.

I guess the same way they were supposed to know the robustness of neanderthal skull. Which was in the same video you said made good points.

There was a lot more than robustness, try watching the video again.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Women notice than but not that African and Caucasian skull look different?

    Robustness of the skull can be pretty undetected compared to eyebrows and someone's jaw.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Just look how round that jaw is at 2:41

      The Neanderthal jaw at 2:41 is obviously more square than the other, no idea what you're talking about.

      And the fact that he implied that humans are naturally attracted to obese women

      The only thing being implied was that cultural standards of beauty were different, which they were.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        And no, the other one is clearly more square-like.

        You're actually blind if you think that. The bottom of the Neanderthal skull is far more square. The homo sapien has a rounded bottom.