What is our Victory Scenario?

submitted by TheJamesRocket from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

What is our Victory Scenario?

You need to look at the bigger picture. Every Elite group is currently benefitting from industrialization. But this is not a sustainable future, especially in terms of where our planet is heading in terms of resource scarcity and massive carbon pollution. So obviously the system of international financing can't work going forward, when Earth becomes too toxic for even the 1% to inhibit.

I'm actually surprised I'm one of the few people who can make these lateral observations. If you want to see how White people could control the future, it's actually requires being environmentalists. Elon Musk even put out a bounty right now of $100 million for anyone who can actually solve the climate crisis. Imagine if it was a pro-White or other Ethno-nationalist group that claimed this prize first?

https://www.space.com/elon-musk-carbon-removal-x-prize#:~:text=The%20Carbon%20Removal%20X%20Prize,it%20will%20run%20through%202025.

We've seen what happens when societies collapse and the balance of power shifts towards someone else. But that's not what the Elites are actually afraid of since they can clearly just hop between countries when their power feels threatened. But Earth being too polluted and toxic for even them means there is no where left to run, so they need to ally with whoever has the technology to save them first.

Edit: And while Elon Musk is giving away prizes, the other richest man in history was willing to to donate $10 Billion towards the same cause. That's not chump change. They know their wealth is only as good as the environment lets them breathe.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/technology/jeff-bezos-climate-change-earth-fund.html

[–]TheJamesRocket[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't subscribe to climate change alarmism. I have not seen any convincing evidence that global temperatures will increase by more than 2 degrees celsius by the end of the century (2100). Most of the models used by climate alarmists don't take into account the Earths own feedback cycles that regulate atmospheric C02. This is a very complicated subject that is open to alot of misunderstanding.

And anyways, even if we did accept the fact that there will be catastrophic global warming (which I don't), there are much easier ways of solving that crisis than trying to de-industrialize the entire planet and drag humanity back to the iron age.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't subscribe to climate change alarmism. I have not seen any convincing evidence that global temperatures will increase by more than 2 degrees celsius by the end of the century (2100). Most of the models used by climate alarmists don't take into account the Earths own feedback cycles that regulate atmospheric C02. This is a very complicated subject that is open to alot of misunderstanding.

When more animals go extinct because the ocean becomes too toxic for them to live in, you better not say that it was "just normal". In fact, there is a reason to be alarmed. Earth is a fragile ecosystem, and it's the only planet we can actually survive on. Even just losing vital animals like Bees is going to have massive consequences on how we continue to harvest food. And with no food or water, EVERYONE will perish.

there are much easier ways of solving that crisis than trying to de-industrialize the entire planet and drag humanity back to the iron age.

Who told you about going back to the Iron Age to stop climate change? That's not a widely accepted idea. We could for example, still have Cars in future. We just need a better source of fuel that causes far less pollution.